Subclinical hearing loss associated with aging

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Cristian Aedo-Sanchez , José Oliveros , Constanza Aranguiz , Camila Muñoz , Claudia Lazo-Maturana , Enzo Aguilar-Vidal
{"title":"Subclinical hearing loss associated with aging","authors":"Cristian Aedo-Sanchez ,&nbsp;José Oliveros ,&nbsp;Constanza Aranguiz ,&nbsp;Camila Muñoz ,&nbsp;Claudia Lazo-Maturana ,&nbsp;Enzo Aguilar-Vidal","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Contribute to clarifying the existence of subclinical hearing deficits associated with aging.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>In this work, we study and compare the auditory perceptual and electrophysiological performance of normal-hearing young and adult subjects (tonal audiometry, high-frequency tone threshold, a triplet of digits in noise, and click-evoked auditory brainstem response).</p></div><div><h3>Study sample</h3><p>45 normal hearing volunteers were evaluated and divided into two groups according to age. 27 subjects were included in the “<em>young group</em>” (mean 22.1 years), and 18 subjects (mean 42.22 years) were included in the “<em>adult group</em>.”</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the perceptual tests, the <em>adult group</em> presented significantly worse tonal thresholds in the high frequencies (12 and 16 kHz) and worse performance in the digit triplet tests in noise. In the electrophysiological test using the auditory brainstem response technique, the adult group presented significantly lower I and V wave amplitudes and higher V wave latencies at the supra-threshold level. At the threshold level, we observed a significantly higher latency in wave V in the adult group. In addition, in the partial correlation analysis, controlling for the hearing level, we observed a relationship (negative) between age and speech in noise performance and high-frequency thresholds. No significant association was observed between age and the auditory brainstem response.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results are compatible with subclinical hearing loss associated with aging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":"18 3","pages":"Pages 111-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/93/main.PMC10366586.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293023000296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Contribute to clarifying the existence of subclinical hearing deficits associated with aging.

Design

In this work, we study and compare the auditory perceptual and electrophysiological performance of normal-hearing young and adult subjects (tonal audiometry, high-frequency tone threshold, a triplet of digits in noise, and click-evoked auditory brainstem response).

Study sample

45 normal hearing volunteers were evaluated and divided into two groups according to age. 27 subjects were included in the “young group” (mean 22.1 years), and 18 subjects (mean 42.22 years) were included in the “adult group.”

Results

In the perceptual tests, the adult group presented significantly worse tonal thresholds in the high frequencies (12 and 16 kHz) and worse performance in the digit triplet tests in noise. In the electrophysiological test using the auditory brainstem response technique, the adult group presented significantly lower I and V wave amplitudes and higher V wave latencies at the supra-threshold level. At the threshold level, we observed a significantly higher latency in wave V in the adult group. In addition, in the partial correlation analysis, controlling for the hearing level, we observed a relationship (negative) between age and speech in noise performance and high-frequency thresholds. No significant association was observed between age and the auditory brainstem response.

Conclusion

The results are compatible with subclinical hearing loss associated with aging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与衰老相关的亚临床听力损失
目的阐明与衰老相关的亚临床听力缺陷的存在。设计在这项工作中,我们研究并比较了听力正常的年轻人和成年受试者的听觉感知和电生理表现(音调测听、高频音调阈值、噪声中的三指和点击诱发的听觉脑干反应)。研究样本45名听力正常的志愿者被评估并根据年龄分为两组。27名受试者被纳入“年轻组”(平均22.1岁),18名受试人(平均42.22岁)被纳入“成年组”。结果在感知测试中,成年组在高频(12和16kHz)下的音调阈值明显较差,在噪声中的数字三元组测试中表现较差。在使用听觉脑干反应技术的电生理测试中,成年组在超阈值水平上表现出明显较低的I和V波振幅和较高的V波潜伏期。在阈值水平上,我们观察到成年组的V波潜伏期明显更高。此外,在偏相关分析中,在控制听力水平的情况下,我们观察到年龄和语音在噪声性能和高频阈值方面的关系(负)。年龄和听性脑干反应之间没有观察到显著的相关性。结论该结果与衰老相关的亚临床听力损失一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信