Safe abortion in Latin America: a look at abortion accompaniment collectives from the perspective of their activists.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Culture, Health & Sexuality Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2023.2233589
Erika E Atienzo, Verónica Cruz, Sofía Garduño, Stephanie Lomelí, Milena Meza, Ruth Zurbriggen, Sofía L Carbone, Alexandra Wollum
{"title":"Safe abortion in Latin America: a look at abortion accompaniment collectives from the perspective of their activists.","authors":"Erika E Atienzo, Verónica Cruz, Sofía Garduño, Stephanie Lomelí, Milena Meza, Ruth Zurbriggen, Sofía L Carbone, Alexandra Wollum","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2023.2233589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last decade, activists in Latin America have expanded access to safe abortion through processes of accompaniment. Abortion accompaniment is characterised by activism and community-based strategies to facilitate access to, and safe use of, medication abortion, mainly outside clinical contexts. Drawing on findings from a survey of 515 activists who were part of Accompaniment Collectives in Latin America, this study describes the organisation of these collectives, barriers and facilitators to their activism, and how accompaniers perceive the impact and future of abortion accompaniment. Accompaniment Collectives are organised and flexible and operate in diverse social and legal contexts. The main goals of accompaniment are the normalisation and social decriminalisation of abortion culturally (84%); the social construction of autonomy (79%); and the protection of people's freedom (73%), life (71%) and health (67%). Activists in legally restrictive settings identified limited access to abortion medication (73%) and restrictive laws (71%) as the main barriers to accompaniment, while health care personnel objecting to abortion provision on grounds of conscience was most common in legally permissive settings (64%). Collectives have developed strategies to overcome such barriers to and expanding access to abortion care. Activists expect accompaniment to continue regardless of the legal status of abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2233589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, activists in Latin America have expanded access to safe abortion through processes of accompaniment. Abortion accompaniment is characterised by activism and community-based strategies to facilitate access to, and safe use of, medication abortion, mainly outside clinical contexts. Drawing on findings from a survey of 515 activists who were part of Accompaniment Collectives in Latin America, this study describes the organisation of these collectives, barriers and facilitators to their activism, and how accompaniers perceive the impact and future of abortion accompaniment. Accompaniment Collectives are organised and flexible and operate in diverse social and legal contexts. The main goals of accompaniment are the normalisation and social decriminalisation of abortion culturally (84%); the social construction of autonomy (79%); and the protection of people's freedom (73%), life (71%) and health (67%). Activists in legally restrictive settings identified limited access to abortion medication (73%) and restrictive laws (71%) as the main barriers to accompaniment, while health care personnel objecting to abortion provision on grounds of conscience was most common in legally permissive settings (64%). Collectives have developed strategies to overcome such barriers to and expanding access to abortion care. Activists expect accompaniment to continue regardless of the legal status of abortion.

拉丁美洲的安全堕胎:从积极分子的角度看堕胎陪伴集体。
在过去十年中,拉丁美洲的活动家通过陪伴过程扩大了安全堕胎的机会。人工流产陪伴的特点是积极行动和基于社区的策略,以促进药物流产的获得和安全使用,主要是在临床环境之外。本研究利用对拉丁美洲 515 名陪伴集体成员中的积极分子进行调查的结果,描述了这些集体的组织结构、开展活动的障碍和促进因素,以及陪伴者如何看待堕胎陪伴的影响和未来。陪伴集体是有组织的、灵活的,在不同的社会和法律背景下运作。陪伴堕胎的主要目标是在文化上使堕胎正常化和社会非刑罪化(84%);自主权的社会建设(79%);以及保护人们的自由(73%)、生命(71%)和健康(67%)。法律限制环境中的积极分子认为,获得堕胎药物的机会有限(73%)和限制性法律(71%)是陪伴的主要障碍,而在法律允许的环境中,医护人员以良心为由反对提供堕胎服务的情况最为普遍(64%)。各团体已制定战略来克服这些障碍,并扩大获得堕胎护理的机会。活动人士期望,无论堕胎的法律地位如何,陪伴工作都能继续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信