Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jane Wu, Christine T Shiner, Steven G Faux, Yuriko Watanabe
{"title":"Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care.","authors":"Jane Wu,&nbsp;Christine T Shiner,&nbsp;Steven G Faux,&nbsp;Yuriko Watanabe","doi":"10.1071/AH23033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study describes how a model of early rehabilitation ('in-reach rehabilitation') can be integrated into acute care provision for hospitalised patients with high rehabilitation needs. This pragmatic evaluation aimed to assess service impact on home discharge rates from acute care. Methods An integrated early rehabilitation service was implemented at a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Eligible patients were screened, placed on a waitlist, and treated in order of debility (six to eight patients concurrently). Routine data were collected and compared between those who received an in-reach rehabilitation program, and controls who remained on waitlist. Results From December 2021 to September 2022, 229 patients were identified as suitable for in-reach rehabilitation; of whom 100 received an in-reach program and the remaining 129 were waitlist controls. Patients who received in-reach rehabilitation achieved a significantly higher rate of discharge home from acute care compared to waitlist controls (46.0% vs 24.0%, P  = 0.002) and lower rates of transfer to subacute inpatient rehabilitation (43.0% vs 62.0%). This was despite in-reach patients having high functional care needs (60% needed assistance from ≥two people to mobilise) and complex medical needs (median hospital length of stay 44.5 days, IQR 27.8-66.0). Conclusions It is feasible to deliver in-reach rehabilitation to hospitalised patients with heterogeneous diagnoses who have high rehabilitation needs. The rate of discharge home directly from acute wards is higher among those patients who received early in-reach rehabilitation compared to those on a waitlist.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study describes how a model of early rehabilitation ('in-reach rehabilitation') can be integrated into acute care provision for hospitalised patients with high rehabilitation needs. This pragmatic evaluation aimed to assess service impact on home discharge rates from acute care. Methods An integrated early rehabilitation service was implemented at a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Eligible patients were screened, placed on a waitlist, and treated in order of debility (six to eight patients concurrently). Routine data were collected and compared between those who received an in-reach rehabilitation program, and controls who remained on waitlist. Results From December 2021 to September 2022, 229 patients were identified as suitable for in-reach rehabilitation; of whom 100 received an in-reach program and the remaining 129 were waitlist controls. Patients who received in-reach rehabilitation achieved a significantly higher rate of discharge home from acute care compared to waitlist controls (46.0% vs 24.0%, P  = 0.002) and lower rates of transfer to subacute inpatient rehabilitation (43.0% vs 62.0%). This was despite in-reach patients having high functional care needs (60% needed assistance from ≥two people to mobilise) and complex medical needs (median hospital length of stay 44.5 days, IQR 27.8-66.0). Conclusions It is feasible to deliver in-reach rehabilitation to hospitalised patients with heterogeneous diagnoses who have high rehabilitation needs. The rate of discharge home directly from acute wards is higher among those patients who received early in-reach rehabilitation compared to those on a waitlist.

实施触手可及的康复计划可以提高从急性医院护理出院回家的比率。
目的本研究描述了如何将早期康复模式(“每次康复”)纳入有高康复需求的住院患者的急性护理中。这项务实的评估旨在评估服务对急性护理家庭出院率的影响。方法在澳大利亚悉尼一所三级教学医院实施综合性早期康复服务。对符合条件的患者进行筛查,列入等待名单,并按虚弱程度进行治疗(同时有六到八名患者)。收集常规数据,并在接受触手可及康复计划的患者和仍在等待名单上的对照组之间进行比较。结果从2021年12月至2022年9月,229名患者被确定为适合进行现场康复;其中100人收到了一个可到达的节目,其余129人是等待名单对照组。与等待名单对照组相比,接受即时康复治疗的患者从急性护理出院回家的比率明显更高(46.0%对24.0%,P = 0.002),转为亚急性住院康复的比率较低(43.0%vs 62.0%)。尽管有高功能护理需求(60%需要≥两个人的协助才能动员)和复杂医疗需求(住院时间中位数44.5 天,IQR 27.8-66.0)。与等待名单上的患者相比,接受早期康复治疗的患者直接从急诊病房出院回家的比率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信