Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Soňa Argalácsová, Michal Vočka, Luboš Petruželka, Miroslav Ryska, Pavel Záruba, Zdeněk Krška, Vladimír Frýba, Jan Ulrych, Vladimír Černý, Tomáš Tůma, David Hoskovec
{"title":"Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Soňa Argalácsová, Michal Vočka, Luboš Petruželka, Miroslav Ryska, Pavel Záruba, Zdeněk Krška, Vladimír Frýba, Jan Ulrych, Vladimír Černý, Tomáš Tůma, David Hoskovec","doi":"10.4149/neo_2023_230409N193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of radiotherapy in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) remains controversial. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with BRPC (14; 29.2%) and LAPC (34; 70. 8%) who underwent 6-8 cycles of induction mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone (23; 47.9%) or 4-6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (up to the total dose of 39.9 Gy in 15 fractions) (25; 52.1%). Survival parameters were evaluated using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test and compared by using the long-rank test. The addition of radiotherapy was not associated with better survival (16.9 months for chemotherapy only versus 15.9 months for the combined therapy; p=0.486), as well as for both subgroups (13.5 months vs. 18.3 months; p=0.679) and (20.7 months vs. 13.8 months; p=0.425) for BRPC and LAPC, respectively. A higher resection rate was seen in the BRPC group compared to the LAPC group (43% vs. 17.6%, respectively). Our study revealed a significantly higher rate of lung metastases in patients after the combination therapy compared to those treated by chemotherapy only (19% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.045). Such a borderline result, however, prevents us from drawing clear conclusions about whether this is an artifact caused by the low number of patients or whether radiotherapy leads to a selection of stem cells with a predilection to the generalization to the lungs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19266,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2023_230409N193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of radiotherapy in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) remains controversial. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with BRPC (14; 29.2%) and LAPC (34; 70. 8%) who underwent 6-8 cycles of induction mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone (23; 47.9%) or 4-6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (up to the total dose of 39.9 Gy in 15 fractions) (25; 52.1%). Survival parameters were evaluated using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test and compared by using the long-rank test. The addition of radiotherapy was not associated with better survival (16.9 months for chemotherapy only versus 15.9 months for the combined therapy; p=0.486), as well as for both subgroups (13.5 months vs. 18.3 months; p=0.679) and (20.7 months vs. 13.8 months; p=0.425) for BRPC and LAPC, respectively. A higher resection rate was seen in the BRPC group compared to the LAPC group (43% vs. 17.6%, respectively). Our study revealed a significantly higher rate of lung metastases in patients after the combination therapy compared to those treated by chemotherapy only (19% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.045). Such a borderline result, however, prevents us from drawing clear conclusions about whether this is an artifact caused by the low number of patients or whether radiotherapy leads to a selection of stem cells with a predilection to the generalization to the lungs.

边缘可切除和局部晚期胰腺腺癌的化疗与化疗放疗。
放疗在边界可切除(BRPC)和局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)中的作用仍存在争议。在我们的研究中,我们对 48 例 BRPC(14 例,占 29.2%)和 LAPC(34 例,占 70.8%)患者进行了回顾性评估,这些患者接受了 6-8 个周期的 mFOLFIRINOX 诱导化疗(23 例,占 47.9%)或 4-6 个周期的 mFOLFIRINOX 诱导化疗后的低分次放疗(总剂量达 39.9 Gy,分 15 次进行)(25 例,占 52.1%)。采用Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon检验评估生存参数,并采用长秩检验进行比较。在BRPC和LAPC两个亚组中,加用放疗与更高的生存率无关(仅化疗为16.9个月,联合治疗为15.9个月;P=0.486),也与更高的生存率无关(分别为13.5个月vs.18.3个月;P=0.679)和(20.7个月vs.13.8个月;P=0.425)。与 LAPC 组相比,BRPC 组的切除率更高(分别为 43% 对 17.6%)。我们的研究显示,与仅接受化疗的患者相比,接受联合疗法的患者肺转移率明显更高(分别为 19% 对 0%;P=0.045)。然而,这种边缘性结果使我们无法得出明确的结论,即这是由于患者人数较少而造成的假象,还是放疗导致干细胞的选择偏向于转移到肺部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neoplasma
Neoplasma 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
238
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Neoplasma publishes articles on experimental and clinical oncology and cancer epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信