Homologies of spinal ascending nociceptive pathways between rats and macaques: can we transpose to human? A review and analysis of the literature.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s00276-023-03212-w
Eric Dabala, Alexis Guédon, Guillaume Ficheux, Louis Béal, Bernard Moxham, Odile Plaisant
{"title":"Homologies of spinal ascending nociceptive pathways between rats and macaques: can we transpose to human? A review and analysis of the literature.","authors":"Eric Dabala,&nbsp;Alexis Guédon,&nbsp;Guillaume Ficheux,&nbsp;Louis Béal,&nbsp;Bernard Moxham,&nbsp;Odile Plaisant","doi":"10.1007/s00276-023-03212-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the difficulty of using neural tracers in humans, knowledge of the nociceptive system's anatomy is mainly derived from studies in animals and mainly in rats. The aim of this study was to investigate the morphological differences of the ascending spinal nociceptive pathways between the rat and the macaque monkey; in order to evaluate the variability of this anatomy during phylogenesis, and thus to know if the anatomical description of these pathways can be transposed from the rat to the human.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review and analysis of the literature were performed. The criteria used for comparison were: origins, pathways, their terminations in target structures, and projections from target structures of ascending spinal nociceptive pathways. The monkey was used as an intermediate species for comparison because of the lack of data in humans. The hypothesis of transposition of anatomy between rat and human was considered rejected if differences were found between rat and monkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An anatomical difference in termination was found for the spino-annular or spino-periaqueductal grey (spino-PAG) pathway and transposition of its anatomy from rat to human was rejected. No difference was found in other pathways and the transposition of their anatomy from rat to human was therefore, not rejected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work highlights the conservation of most of the ascending spinal nociceptive pathways' anatomy between rat and monkey. Thus, the possibility for a transposition of their anatomy between rat and human is not rejected.</p>","PeriodicalId":49296,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03212-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the difficulty of using neural tracers in humans, knowledge of the nociceptive system's anatomy is mainly derived from studies in animals and mainly in rats. The aim of this study was to investigate the morphological differences of the ascending spinal nociceptive pathways between the rat and the macaque monkey; in order to evaluate the variability of this anatomy during phylogenesis, and thus to know if the anatomical description of these pathways can be transposed from the rat to the human.

Methods: A review and analysis of the literature were performed. The criteria used for comparison were: origins, pathways, their terminations in target structures, and projections from target structures of ascending spinal nociceptive pathways. The monkey was used as an intermediate species for comparison because of the lack of data in humans. The hypothesis of transposition of anatomy between rat and human was considered rejected if differences were found between rat and monkey.

Results: An anatomical difference in termination was found for the spino-annular or spino-periaqueductal grey (spino-PAG) pathway and transposition of its anatomy from rat to human was rejected. No difference was found in other pathways and the transposition of their anatomy from rat to human was therefore, not rejected.

Conclusion: This work highlights the conservation of most of the ascending spinal nociceptive pathways' anatomy between rat and monkey. Thus, the possibility for a transposition of their anatomy between rat and human is not rejected.

Abstract Image

大鼠和猕猴之间脊髓上行伤害性通路的同源性:我们能转换成人类吗?文献综述与分析。
目的:由于在人类中使用神经示踪剂的困难,对伤害感受系统解剖的了解主要来自于对动物和大鼠的研究。本研究的目的是研究大鼠和猕猴脊髓上行伤害感受通路的形态学差异;以便在系统发育过程中评估这种解剖结构的可变性,从而了解这些途径的解剖描述是否可以从大鼠转移到人类。方法:对文献进行回顾性分析。用于比较的标准是:起源、途径、它们在靶结构中的终止以及上行脊髓伤害性途径的靶结构的投射。由于缺乏人类的数据,猴子被用作中间物种进行比较。如果在大鼠和猴子之间发现差异,则认为大鼠和人之间的解剖结构移位的假设被拒绝。结果:发现棘环或棘导水管周围灰质(spino-PAG)通路在终止方面存在解剖学差异,并拒绝将其解剖结构从大鼠移植到人。在其他通路中没有发现差异,因此,将它们的解剖结构从大鼠移植到人身上并没有被拒绝。结论:这项工作强调了大鼠和猴子之间大多数上行脊髓伤害性通路解剖结构的保守性。因此,在大鼠和人之间移植它们的解剖结构的可能性并没有被拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信