How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code.

IF 2.8 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2022.2115888

Hans Radder

引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article starts with a concise explanation of the nature and role of values and norms. I emphasize the ethical and political importance of making explicit how values are interpreted and which norms are taken to advance them in concrete situations. Next, I apply this account in a critical examination of the recent Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. The conclusion is that this code is based on a flawed conception and an inadequate analysis of the nature and role of values and norms in science. Finally, I briefly sketch how the defects of the integrity code might be remedied by developing policies based on the broader notion of the public interest of science.

查看原文本刊更多论文

如何(不)在研究中被问责:荷兰诚信守则的案例。

本文首先对价值观和规范的性质和作用作了简明的解释。我强调明确如何解释价值观以及在具体情况下采取哪些规范来促进价值观的道德和政治重要性。接下来，我将运用这一理论对最近颁布的《荷兰研究诚信行为准则》进行批判性审查。结论是，这个准则是基于一个有缺陷的概念，以及对科学中的价值和规范的性质和作用的不充分分析。最后，我简要概述了诚信准则的缺陷是如何通过制定基于科学公共利益这一更广泛概念的政策来弥补的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.