An Exploration of Critical Care Professionals' Strategies to Enhance Daily Implementation of the Assess, Prevent, and Manage Pain; Both Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials; Choice of Analgesia and Sedation; Delirium Assess, Prevent, and Manage; Early Mobility and Exercise; and Family Engagement and Empowerment: A Group Concept Mapping Study.

Critical Care Explorations Pub Date : 2023-03-03 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000872
Lorraine C Mion, Alai Tan, Audrey Brockman, Judith A Tate, Eduard E Vasilevskis, Brenda T Pun, Scott R Rosas, Michele C Balas
{"title":"An Exploration of Critical Care Professionals' Strategies to Enhance Daily Implementation of the Assess, Prevent, and Manage Pain; Both Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials; Choice of Analgesia and Sedation; Delirium Assess, Prevent, and Manage; Early Mobility and Exercise; and Family Engagement and Empowerment: A Group Concept Mapping Study.","authors":"Lorraine C Mion, Alai Tan, Audrey Brockman, Judith A Tate, Eduard E Vasilevskis, Brenda T Pun, Scott R Rosas, Michele C Balas","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goals of this exploratory study were to engage professionals from the Society for Critical Care Medicine ICU Liberation Collaborative ICUs to: 1) conceptualize strategies to enhance daily implementation of the Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; Choice of analgesia and sedation; Delirium assess, prevent, and manage; Early mobility and exercise; and Family engagement and empowerment (ABCDEF) bundle from different perspectives and 2) identify strategies to prioritize for implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods group concept mapping over 8 months using an online method. Participants provided strategies in response to a prompt about what was needed for successful daily ABCDEF bundle implementation. Responses were summarized into a set of unique statements and then rated on a 5-point scale on degree of necessity (essential) and degree to which currently used.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sixty-eight academic, community, and federal ICUs.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 121 ICU professionals consisting of frontline and leadership professionals.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A final set of 76 strategies (reduced from 188 responses) were suggested: education (16 strategies), collaboration (15 strategies), processes and protocols (13 strategies), feedback (10 strategies), sedation/pain practices (nine strategies), education (eight strategies), and family (five strategies). Nine strategies were rated as very essential but infrequently used: adequate staffing, adequate mobility equipment, attention to (patient's) sleep, open discussion and collaborative problem solving, nonsedation methods to address ventilator dyssynchrony, specific expectations for night and day shifts, education of whole team on interdependent nature of the bundle, and effective sleep protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this concept mapping study, ICU professionals provided strategies that spanned a number of conceptual implementation clusters. Results can be used by ICU leaders for implementation planning to address context-specific interdisciplinary approaches to improve ABCDEF bundle implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 3","pages":"e0872"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/7e/cc9-5-e0872.PMC9988323.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goals of this exploratory study were to engage professionals from the Society for Critical Care Medicine ICU Liberation Collaborative ICUs to: 1) conceptualize strategies to enhance daily implementation of the Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; Choice of analgesia and sedation; Delirium assess, prevent, and manage; Early mobility and exercise; and Family engagement and empowerment (ABCDEF) bundle from different perspectives and 2) identify strategies to prioritize for implementation.

Design: Mixed-methods group concept mapping over 8 months using an online method. Participants provided strategies in response to a prompt about what was needed for successful daily ABCDEF bundle implementation. Responses were summarized into a set of unique statements and then rated on a 5-point scale on degree of necessity (essential) and degree to which currently used.

Setting: Sixty-eight academic, community, and federal ICUs.

Participants: A total of 121 ICU professionals consisting of frontline and leadership professionals.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: A final set of 76 strategies (reduced from 188 responses) were suggested: education (16 strategies), collaboration (15 strategies), processes and protocols (13 strategies), feedback (10 strategies), sedation/pain practices (nine strategies), education (eight strategies), and family (five strategies). Nine strategies were rated as very essential but infrequently used: adequate staffing, adequate mobility equipment, attention to (patient's) sleep, open discussion and collaborative problem solving, nonsedation methods to address ventilator dyssynchrony, specific expectations for night and day shifts, education of whole team on interdependent nature of the bundle, and effective sleep protocol.

Conclusions: In this concept mapping study, ICU professionals provided strategies that spanned a number of conceptual implementation clusters. Results can be used by ICU leaders for implementation planning to address context-specific interdisciplinary approaches to improve ABCDEF bundle implementation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重症监护专业人员加强日常疼痛评估、预防和管理的策略探讨自发觉醒与呼吸试验;镇痛、镇静方法的选择;谵妄的评估、预防和管理;早期活动和锻炼;家庭参与和赋权:一项群体概念映射研究。
本探索性研究的目的是吸引重症监护医学学会ICU解放合作ICU的专业人员参与:1)构思策略,以加强评估、预防和管理疼痛的日常实施;自发觉醒和呼吸试验;镇痛、镇静的选择;谵妄的评估、预防和管理;早期活动和锻炼;和家庭参与和赋权(ABCDEF)从不同的角度捆绑在一起;2)确定优先实施的战略。设计:使用在线方法进行为期8个月的混合方法组概念映射。与会者根据提示提供策略,说明成功实现每日ABCDEF捆绑包所需的条件。回答被总结成一组独特的陈述,然后根据必要性(基本)和目前使用的程度以5分制进行评分。设置:68个学术、社区和联邦icu。参与者:共有121名ICU专业人员,包括一线和领导专业人员。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:最终提出了76个策略(从188个回应中减少):教育(16个策略)、协作(15个策略)、流程和协议(13个策略)、反馈(10个策略)、镇静/疼痛实践(9个策略)、教育(8个策略)和家庭(5个策略)。9项策略被评为非常重要但很少使用:充足的人员配备、充足的活动设备、对(患者)睡眠的关注、公开讨论和协作解决问题、解决呼吸机不同步的非镇静方法、对白班和夜班的具体期望、对整个团队进行相互依赖性质的教育以及有效的睡眠协议。结论:在这个概念图研究中,ICU专业人员提供了跨越多个概念实施集群的策略。结果可用于ICU领导的实施计划,以解决具体情况的跨学科方法,以改善ABCDEF包的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书