Assessing the impact of neurosurgery and neuroanatomy simulation using 3D non-cadaveric models amongst selected African medical students.

Frontiers in Medical Technology Pub Date : 2023-05-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2023.1190096
Berjo Dongmo Takoutsing, Ubraine Njineck Wunde, Yvan Zolo, Geneviève Endalle, Dieunedort Arnold Menga Djaowé, Léopoldine Sybile Ngoune Tatsadjieu, Ines Miste Zourmba, Aminatou Dadda, Roland Ndouh Nchufor, Cyrille Duquesne Nkouonlack, Ernestine Renée Atangana Bikono, Jean Paul Oumarou Magadji, Casimir Fankem, Alain Bertrand Tchoupo Jibia, Ignatius Esene
{"title":"Assessing the impact of neurosurgery and neuroanatomy simulation using 3D non-cadaveric models amongst selected African medical students.","authors":"Berjo Dongmo Takoutsing, Ubraine Njineck Wunde, Yvan Zolo, Geneviève Endalle, Dieunedort Arnold Menga Djaowé, Léopoldine Sybile Ngoune Tatsadjieu, Ines Miste Zourmba, Aminatou Dadda, Roland Ndouh Nchufor, Cyrille Duquesne Nkouonlack, Ernestine Renée Atangana Bikono, Jean Paul Oumarou Magadji, Casimir Fankem, Alain Bertrand Tchoupo Jibia, Ignatius Esene","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2023.1190096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory dissections are essential to acquire practical skills to perform neurosurgical procedures. Despite being traditionally done on cadavers, they are often unavailable and suffer from cultural barriers in the African context. Non-cadaveric UpSurgeOn neurosurgery models have been developed to bridge this barrier, providing an almost similar experience with the human body. This study aimed to assess the impact of the UpSurgeOn hands-on-touch non-cadaver model training amongst selected Cameroon medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous 35-item questionnaire was distributed online using Google drive systems to medical students who attended UpSurgeOn's hands-on-touch non-cadaver model training course. These questions aimed to capture data on previous experience with neuroanatomy and neurosurgery practicals and the perception, attitudes, and impact of the UpSurgeOn neurosurgery tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six students completed the survey. The mean age was 21.2 ± 1.868 years, 61.6% were males with 62.8% of respondents being medical students in preclinical years. Before the training, 29.4% had a fair knowledge of neuroanatomy. Textbooks and Youtube videos were the main sources of neuroanatomy and neurosurgery knowledge for more than half of the respondents. Up to 91.5% had no prior exposure to a neuroanatomy/neurosurgery cadaver laboratory dissection, and 22.6% and 17.6% had witnessed and performed at least one craniotomy before, respectively. There were 11.1%, 15.5%, and 31.3% of our respondents who had used a surgical microscope, a neurosurgical instrument, and the UpSurgeOn Neurosurgery tool before, respectively. The majority perceived the UpSurgeOn tool easy to use and felt they needed to learn just a few things before getting going with the box. Most thought of increasing the use of the UpSurgeOn Box and saw the need to be part of the training curriculum. Finally, the majority felt this tool helped to increase familiarity and acquire neurosurgical skills, and to develop the orientation skills needed during neurosurgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Undergraduate exposure to traditional neurosurgery/neuroanatomy labs is limited in Cameroon. Neurosurgery/neuroanatomy practical skills are gained essentially using non-practical means. Most students found the UpSurgeOn tool user-friendly, saw the need to incorporate it as part of their training, and perceived it to be essential in getting acquainted with neurosurgical skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"1190096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1190096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laboratory dissections are essential to acquire practical skills to perform neurosurgical procedures. Despite being traditionally done on cadavers, they are often unavailable and suffer from cultural barriers in the African context. Non-cadaveric UpSurgeOn neurosurgery models have been developed to bridge this barrier, providing an almost similar experience with the human body. This study aimed to assess the impact of the UpSurgeOn hands-on-touch non-cadaver model training amongst selected Cameroon medical students.

Methods: An anonymous 35-item questionnaire was distributed online using Google drive systems to medical students who attended UpSurgeOn's hands-on-touch non-cadaver model training course. These questions aimed to capture data on previous experience with neuroanatomy and neurosurgery practicals and the perception, attitudes, and impact of the UpSurgeOn neurosurgery tool.

Results: Eighty-six students completed the survey. The mean age was 21.2 ± 1.868 years, 61.6% were males with 62.8% of respondents being medical students in preclinical years. Before the training, 29.4% had a fair knowledge of neuroanatomy. Textbooks and Youtube videos were the main sources of neuroanatomy and neurosurgery knowledge for more than half of the respondents. Up to 91.5% had no prior exposure to a neuroanatomy/neurosurgery cadaver laboratory dissection, and 22.6% and 17.6% had witnessed and performed at least one craniotomy before, respectively. There were 11.1%, 15.5%, and 31.3% of our respondents who had used a surgical microscope, a neurosurgical instrument, and the UpSurgeOn Neurosurgery tool before, respectively. The majority perceived the UpSurgeOn tool easy to use and felt they needed to learn just a few things before getting going with the box. Most thought of increasing the use of the UpSurgeOn Box and saw the need to be part of the training curriculum. Finally, the majority felt this tool helped to increase familiarity and acquire neurosurgical skills, and to develop the orientation skills needed during neurosurgical approaches.

Conclusion: Undergraduate exposure to traditional neurosurgery/neuroanatomy labs is limited in Cameroon. Neurosurgery/neuroanatomy practical skills are gained essentially using non-practical means. Most students found the UpSurgeOn tool user-friendly, saw the need to incorporate it as part of their training, and perceived it to be essential in getting acquainted with neurosurgical skills.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估使用三维非尸体模型模拟神经外科和神经解剖学对部分非洲医科学生的影响。
背景:实验室解剖对于掌握神经外科手术的实践技能至关重要。尽管传统上是在尸体上进行解剖,但在非洲往往没有尸体,而且存在文化障碍。为了消除这一障碍,人们开发了非尸体UpSurgeOn神经外科模型,提供与人体几乎相似的体验。本研究旨在评估UpSurgeOn手触式非尸体模型培训对喀麦隆部分医学生的影响:方法:使用谷歌驱动系统向参加UpSurgeOn非金刚石模型动手触摸培训课程的医科学生在线发放了一份包含35个项目的匿名调查问卷。这些问题旨在收集有关神经解剖学和神经外科实践经验的数据,以及对UpSurgeOn神经外科工具的看法、态度和影响:86名学生完成了调查。平均年龄为(21.2 ± 1.868)岁,61.6%为男生,62.8%的受访者为临床前医学专业学生。培训前,29.4%的受访者对神经解剖学的了解程度一般。教科书和 Youtube 视频是半数以上受访者神经解剖学和神经外科知识的主要来源。高达91.5%的受访者之前没有接触过神经解剖学/神经外科尸体实验室解剖,分别有22.6%和17.6%的受访者之前至少目睹和进行过一次开颅手术。曾使用过手术显微镜、神经外科器械和 UpSurgeOn 神经外科工具的受访者分别占 11.1%、15.5% 和 31.3%。大多数受访者认为 UpSurgeOn 工具易于使用,并认为他们只需学习几步就能上手使用。大多数人认为有必要增加 UpSurgeOn Box 的使用,并将其作为培训课程的一部分。最后,大多数人认为该工具有助于增加对神经外科技能的熟悉和掌握,并培养神经外科手术过程中所需的定向技能:结论:在喀麦隆,本科生接触传统神经外科/神经解剖实验室的机会有限。神经外科/神经解剖学实践技能基本上是通过非实践手段获得的。大多数学生认为UpSurgeOn工具使用方便,有必要将其作为培训的一部分,并认为它对熟悉神经外科技能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信