[Competencies expected of labor and social security attorneys in harmonizing work with diseases treatment].

Q4 Medicine
Hideki Morimoto, Yoshiyuki Shibata, Daisuke Kataoka, Kosuke Sakai, Rima Hiramatsu, Kotaro Morita, Tadashi Wakabayashi, Koji Mori
{"title":"[Competencies expected of labor and social security attorneys in harmonizing work with diseases treatment].","authors":"Hideki Morimoto,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Shibata,&nbsp;Daisuke Kataoka,&nbsp;Kosuke Sakai,&nbsp;Rima Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Kotaro Morita,&nbsp;Tadashi Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Koji Mori","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2022-011-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Labor and social security attorneys (LSSAs) are involved in various positions in harmonizing work with disease treatment; however, their qualification requirements do not include knowledge about the same. Expectations of their involvement in harmonizing work with disease treatment are insufficient. This study aimed to identify the competencies expected of the labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In step 1, semi-structured interviews were conducted with LSSAs in this field. In step 2, a draft competency list was created based on the interview results. In step 3, the Delphi method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among LSSAs who had over 10 consultation cases on harmonizing work with disease treatment, and they were asked about the level of importance (how important they thought it was to promote harmonizing work with disease treatment) and level of achievement (how much they had achieved). We also asked them about the competencies they considered necessary and added them as additional items in the draft. In step 4, the results of the previous step were presented to the participants who had given valid answers in step 3, and they were asked whether they would adopt the items as competencies. Items with an agreement rate of 80% or higher were considered competency items. Additionally, we asked them about the level of importance and level of achievement of the additional items created in step 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In step 1, 24 LSSAs participated, and in step 2, a draft competency list of six major items, 18 medium items, and 71 minor items was created. In step 3, 49 LSSAs participated and 41 cooperated (response rate: 83.6%). Five items were selected for the draft competency list to be newly added. In step 4, 30 LSSAs cooperated (response rate: 73.1%). None of the items had an agreement rate of less than 80%, and over 40% of the items had an agreement rate of 100%. As a result, six major items, 18 medium items, and 76 minor items were selected for the competency list.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified the competencies expected of labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment. The results of this study can be used as a reference for developing a systematic training curriculum for LSSAs in this field in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"65 3","pages":"142-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2022-011-E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Labor and social security attorneys (LSSAs) are involved in various positions in harmonizing work with disease treatment; however, their qualification requirements do not include knowledge about the same. Expectations of their involvement in harmonizing work with disease treatment are insufficient. This study aimed to identify the competencies expected of the labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment.

Methods: In step 1, semi-structured interviews were conducted with LSSAs in this field. In step 2, a draft competency list was created based on the interview results. In step 3, the Delphi method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among LSSAs who had over 10 consultation cases on harmonizing work with disease treatment, and they were asked about the level of importance (how important they thought it was to promote harmonizing work with disease treatment) and level of achievement (how much they had achieved). We also asked them about the competencies they considered necessary and added them as additional items in the draft. In step 4, the results of the previous step were presented to the participants who had given valid answers in step 3, and they were asked whether they would adopt the items as competencies. Items with an agreement rate of 80% or higher were considered competency items. Additionally, we asked them about the level of importance and level of achievement of the additional items created in step 3.

Results: In step 1, 24 LSSAs participated, and in step 2, a draft competency list of six major items, 18 medium items, and 71 minor items was created. In step 3, 49 LSSAs participated and 41 cooperated (response rate: 83.6%). Five items were selected for the draft competency list to be newly added. In step 4, 30 LSSAs cooperated (response rate: 73.1%). None of the items had an agreement rate of less than 80%, and over 40% of the items had an agreement rate of 100%. As a result, six major items, 18 medium items, and 76 minor items were selected for the competency list.

Conclusions: This study identified the competencies expected of labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment. The results of this study can be used as a reference for developing a systematic training curriculum for LSSAs in this field in the future.

[劳动和社会保障律师应具备的协调工作与疾病治疗的能力]。
目标:劳动和社会保障律师(LSSAs)参与协调工作与疾病治疗的各种职位;然而,他们的资格要求并不包括这方面的知识。对他们参与协调疾病治疗工作的期望是不够的。本研究旨在确定劳动和社会保障LSSAs在协调工作与疾病治疗方面的能力。方法:在第一步中,对该领域的LSSAs进行半结构化访谈。在步骤2中,根据面试结果创建了一个能力清单草案。第三步,采用德尔菲法对有10例以上疾病治疗协调工作咨询案例的LSSAs进行问卷调查,询问其重要性程度(他们认为促进疾病治疗协调工作有多重要)和成就程度(他们取得了多少成就)。我们还询问了他们认为必要的能力,并将其作为附加项目添加到草案中。在步骤4中,将前一步的结果呈现给在步骤3中给出有效答案的参与者,并询问他们是否将这些项目作为胜任力。同意率达到80%或更高的项目被认为是能力项目。此外,我们还询问了他们在步骤3中创建的附加项目的重要性和完成程度。结果:在步骤1中,有24个LSSAs参与;在步骤2中,形成了包含6个主要项目、18个中等项目和71个次要项目的胜任力清单草案。第三步,49家LSSAs参与,41家LSSAs配合,响应率为83.6%。选出5个项目作为新增加的胜任力清单草案。在步骤4中,30个LSSAs合作(响应率为73.1%)。没有一个项目的同意率低于80%,超过40%的项目的同意率为100%。结果,选取了6个主要项目、18个中等项目和76个次要项目作为胜任力表。结论:本研究确定了劳动和社会保障LSSAs在协调工作与疾病治疗方面的能力。本研究的结果可为今后编制该领域的LSSAs系统培训课程提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信