Hideki Morimoto, Yoshiyuki Shibata, Daisuke Kataoka, Kosuke Sakai, Rima Hiramatsu, Kotaro Morita, Tadashi Wakabayashi, Koji Mori
{"title":"[Competencies expected of labor and social security attorneys in harmonizing work with diseases treatment].","authors":"Hideki Morimoto, Yoshiyuki Shibata, Daisuke Kataoka, Kosuke Sakai, Rima Hiramatsu, Kotaro Morita, Tadashi Wakabayashi, Koji Mori","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2022-011-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Labor and social security attorneys (LSSAs) are involved in various positions in harmonizing work with disease treatment; however, their qualification requirements do not include knowledge about the same. Expectations of their involvement in harmonizing work with disease treatment are insufficient. This study aimed to identify the competencies expected of the labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In step 1, semi-structured interviews were conducted with LSSAs in this field. In step 2, a draft competency list was created based on the interview results. In step 3, the Delphi method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among LSSAs who had over 10 consultation cases on harmonizing work with disease treatment, and they were asked about the level of importance (how important they thought it was to promote harmonizing work with disease treatment) and level of achievement (how much they had achieved). We also asked them about the competencies they considered necessary and added them as additional items in the draft. In step 4, the results of the previous step were presented to the participants who had given valid answers in step 3, and they were asked whether they would adopt the items as competencies. Items with an agreement rate of 80% or higher were considered competency items. Additionally, we asked them about the level of importance and level of achievement of the additional items created in step 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In step 1, 24 LSSAs participated, and in step 2, a draft competency list of six major items, 18 medium items, and 71 minor items was created. In step 3, 49 LSSAs participated and 41 cooperated (response rate: 83.6%). Five items were selected for the draft competency list to be newly added. In step 4, 30 LSSAs cooperated (response rate: 73.1%). None of the items had an agreement rate of less than 80%, and over 40% of the items had an agreement rate of 100%. As a result, six major items, 18 medium items, and 76 minor items were selected for the competency list.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified the competencies expected of labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment. The results of this study can be used as a reference for developing a systematic training curriculum for LSSAs in this field in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"65 3","pages":"142-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2022-011-E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Labor and social security attorneys (LSSAs) are involved in various positions in harmonizing work with disease treatment; however, their qualification requirements do not include knowledge about the same. Expectations of their involvement in harmonizing work with disease treatment are insufficient. This study aimed to identify the competencies expected of the labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment.
Methods: In step 1, semi-structured interviews were conducted with LSSAs in this field. In step 2, a draft competency list was created based on the interview results. In step 3, the Delphi method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among LSSAs who had over 10 consultation cases on harmonizing work with disease treatment, and they were asked about the level of importance (how important they thought it was to promote harmonizing work with disease treatment) and level of achievement (how much they had achieved). We also asked them about the competencies they considered necessary and added them as additional items in the draft. In step 4, the results of the previous step were presented to the participants who had given valid answers in step 3, and they were asked whether they would adopt the items as competencies. Items with an agreement rate of 80% or higher were considered competency items. Additionally, we asked them about the level of importance and level of achievement of the additional items created in step 3.
Results: In step 1, 24 LSSAs participated, and in step 2, a draft competency list of six major items, 18 medium items, and 71 minor items was created. In step 3, 49 LSSAs participated and 41 cooperated (response rate: 83.6%). Five items were selected for the draft competency list to be newly added. In step 4, 30 LSSAs cooperated (response rate: 73.1%). None of the items had an agreement rate of less than 80%, and over 40% of the items had an agreement rate of 100%. As a result, six major items, 18 medium items, and 76 minor items were selected for the competency list.
Conclusions: This study identified the competencies expected of labor and social security LSSAs in harmonizing work with disease treatment. The results of this study can be used as a reference for developing a systematic training curriculum for LSSAs in this field in the future.