Pilot study: Correlation between nasalance scores and cephalometric parameters in Estonian cleft palate children.

Q2 Dentistry
Stomatologija Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Lagle Lehes, Carina Aria, Marika Padrik, Priit Kasenõmm, Triin Jagomägi
{"title":"Pilot study: Correlation between nasalance scores and cephalometric parameters in Estonian cleft palate children.","authors":"Lagle Lehes,&nbsp;Carina Aria,&nbsp;Marika Padrik,&nbsp;Priit Kasenõmm,&nbsp;Triin Jagomägi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>According to Klassen et al. (2012), the overall quality of life of CL/P children is most affected by appearance and quality of speech, as these differences are most noticeable to others. To what extent changes in craniofacial growth have an impact on speech quality has yet to be clarified. Therefore, we aimed to determine which cephalometric parameters differed between healthy and cleft palate groups.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>17 healthy and 11 children born with CL/P were included. We conducted a cross-sectional and comparative study. A combination of objective and subjective assessment methods was performed: nasalance scores were calculated, and lateral cephalograms were evaluated by indirect digitization using Dolphin Imaging Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed differences in the length of the hard (PNS-A) and soft palate (PNS-P), and in the width of the lower oropharyngeal airway (AW5-AW6). The mean length of the hard palate was 3.7 mm and the soft palate 3.0 mm shorter in the CL/P group compared to the healthy group. Hypernasal resonance was related to (1) the length of the hard palate, (2) the distance between the hyoid bone from the third cervical vertebra, and (3) the angle formed by the NA line and the NB line (ANB). Only 11 CL/P children met the inclusion criteria. Thus, the results may have been affected by the small sample size. The Control group consisted of children who visited ENT doctors or orthodontists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed differences in cephalometric parameters in the two groups. Still, we continue to collect data and plan to conduct the analysis on larger and more homogenous sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":35508,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologija","volume":"25 1","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: According to Klassen et al. (2012), the overall quality of life of CL/P children is most affected by appearance and quality of speech, as these differences are most noticeable to others. To what extent changes in craniofacial growth have an impact on speech quality has yet to be clarified. Therefore, we aimed to determine which cephalometric parameters differed between healthy and cleft palate groups.

Material and methods: 17 healthy and 11 children born with CL/P were included. We conducted a cross-sectional and comparative study. A combination of objective and subjective assessment methods was performed: nasalance scores were calculated, and lateral cephalograms were evaluated by indirect digitization using Dolphin Imaging Software.

Results: The analysis showed differences in the length of the hard (PNS-A) and soft palate (PNS-P), and in the width of the lower oropharyngeal airway (AW5-AW6). The mean length of the hard palate was 3.7 mm and the soft palate 3.0 mm shorter in the CL/P group compared to the healthy group. Hypernasal resonance was related to (1) the length of the hard palate, (2) the distance between the hyoid bone from the third cervical vertebra, and (3) the angle formed by the NA line and the NB line (ANB). Only 11 CL/P children met the inclusion criteria. Thus, the results may have been affected by the small sample size. The Control group consisted of children who visited ENT doctors or orthodontists.

Conclusion: The results showed differences in cephalometric parameters in the two groups. Still, we continue to collect data and plan to conduct the analysis on larger and more homogenous sample size.

初步研究:爱沙尼亚腭裂儿童鼻翼平衡评分与头侧测量参数的相关性。
背景与目的:根据Klassen et al.(2012)的研究,CL/P儿童的整体生活质量受外貌和语言质量的影响最大,因为这些差异对他人来说是最明显的。颅面生长的变化对语音质量的影响程度尚不清楚。因此,我们的目的是确定健康组和腭裂组之间哪些头测参数不同。材料和方法:纳入17例健康儿童和11例出生时患有CL/P的儿童。我们进行了横断面对比研究。采用客观与主观相结合的评价方法:计算鼻翼平衡评分,采用Dolphin Imaging Software间接数字化评价侧位脑电图。结果:分析显示硬腭(PNS-A)和软腭(PNS-P)长度、下口咽气道宽度(AW5-AW6)存在差异。与正常组相比,CL/P组的硬腭平均长度缩短3.7 mm,软腭平均长度缩短3.0 mm。高鼻共振与(1)硬腭长度、(2)舌骨与第三颈椎之间的距离、(3)NA线与NB线(ANB)形成的夹角有关。只有11名CL/P患儿符合纳入标准。因此,结果可能受到小样本量的影响。对照组由看过耳鼻喉科医生或正畸医生的儿童组成。结论:两组患者的头颅测量指标存在差异。尽管如此,我们仍在继续收集数据,并计划在更大、更均匀的样本量上进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stomatologija
Stomatologija Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信