The evolution in pituitary tumour classification: a clinical perspective.

Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2023-04-21 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1530/EO-22-0079
Nele F Lenders, Peter E Earls, Warrick J Inder, Ann I McCormack
{"title":"The evolution in pituitary tumour classification: a clinical perspective.","authors":"Nele F Lenders, Peter E Earls, Warrick J Inder, Ann I McCormack","doi":"10.1530/EO-22-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pituitary tumours comprise a pathologically and clinically diverse group of neoplasms. Classification frameworks have changed dramatically in the past two decades, reflecting improving understanding of tumour biology. This narrative review examines the evolution of pituitary tumour classification, from a clinical perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2004, pituitary tumours were classified as 'typical' or 'atypical', based on the presence of markers of proliferation, Ki67, mitotic count and p53. In 2017, the new WHO marked a major paradigm shift, with a new focus on lineage-based classification, determined by transcription factor and hormonal immunohistochemistry. The terms 'typical' and 'atypical' were omitted, though the importance of proliferative markers Ki67 and mitotic count was acknowledged. The recent WHO 2022 classification incorporates further refinements, specifically recognising some less common types that may represent less well-differentiated tumours. Whilst 'high risk' tumour types have been identified, further work is still required to improve prognostication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent WHO classifications have marked significant progress in the diagnostic evaluation of pituitary tumours, though shortcomings and challenges remain for both clinicians and pathologists in managing these tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":72907,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","volume":"3 1","pages":"e220079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2c/1f/EO-22-0079.PMC10305559.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EO-22-0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pituitary tumours comprise a pathologically and clinically diverse group of neoplasms. Classification frameworks have changed dramatically in the past two decades, reflecting improving understanding of tumour biology. This narrative review examines the evolution of pituitary tumour classification, from a clinical perspective.

Results: In 2004, pituitary tumours were classified as 'typical' or 'atypical', based on the presence of markers of proliferation, Ki67, mitotic count and p53. In 2017, the new WHO marked a major paradigm shift, with a new focus on lineage-based classification, determined by transcription factor and hormonal immunohistochemistry. The terms 'typical' and 'atypical' were omitted, though the importance of proliferative markers Ki67 and mitotic count was acknowledged. The recent WHO 2022 classification incorporates further refinements, specifically recognising some less common types that may represent less well-differentiated tumours. Whilst 'high risk' tumour types have been identified, further work is still required to improve prognostication.

Conclusions: Recent WHO classifications have marked significant progress in the diagnostic evaluation of pituitary tumours, though shortcomings and challenges remain for both clinicians and pathologists in managing these tumours.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

垂体瘤分类的演变:临床视角。
目的:垂体瘤是病理和临床上多种多样的肿瘤。在过去二十年中,分类框架发生了巨大变化,反映了人们对肿瘤生物学认识的提高。这篇叙述性综述从临床角度探讨了垂体瘤分类的演变:2004年,垂体瘤被分为 "典型 "和 "非典型",依据是肿瘤是否存在增殖标志物、Ki67、有丝分裂计数和p53。2017年,新版世卫组织标志着模式的重大转变,其新重点是基于转录因子和激素免疫组化确定的线型分类。尽管增殖标志物 Ki67 和有丝分裂计数的重要性得到了认可,但 "典型 "和 "非典型 "两个术语被省略。最新的世卫组织 2022 年分类法进一步完善了这一分类法,特别承认了一些不太常见的类型,这些类型可能代表分化程度较低的肿瘤。虽然 "高风险 "肿瘤类型已被确定,但仍需进一步工作以改善预后:最近的世卫组织分类标志着垂体瘤诊断评估取得了重大进展,但临床医生和病理学家在管理这些肿瘤方面仍存在不足和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信