Necessity of Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy Following Inferior Vena Cava Stent Placement in Patients with Cancer.

Mizuki Ozawa, Miyuki Sone, Shunsuke Sugawara, Chihiro Itou, Shintaro Kimura, Yasuaki Arai, Masahiko Kusumoto
{"title":"Necessity of Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy Following Inferior Vena Cava Stent Placement in Patients with Cancer.","authors":"Mizuki Ozawa,&nbsp;Miyuki Sone,&nbsp;Shunsuke Sugawara,&nbsp;Chihiro Itou,&nbsp;Shintaro Kimura,&nbsp;Yasuaki Arai,&nbsp;Masahiko Kusumoto","doi":"10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although percutaneous stent placement for malignant inferior vena cava syndrome is a highly feasible and effective treatment option, there is no clear evidence for the necessity of prophylactic anticoagulation therapy after inferior vena cava stent placement. This study retrospectively evaluated the necessity of prophylactic anticoagulation following inferior vena cava stent placement in patients with malignant inferior vena cava syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 54 patients (28 men and 26 women; median age 61.2 years) with malignant inferior vena cava syndrome who received inferior vena cava stent placement between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Prophylactic anticoagulation was administered to 15 of 54 patients (27.8%) following stent placement. Symptom recurrence rates at 1 and 2 months after stent placement were compared between patients with and without prophylactic anticoagulation using Gray relational analysis. The timeline of symptom recurrence, survival time, and adverse events were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1 and 2 months, symptom recurrence rates were 48.6% and 71.4%, respectively, in patients with prophylactic anticoagulation and 28.3% and 37.0%, respectively, in patients without prophylactic anticoagulation. The overall median follow-up duration was 27 days and that of the patients with and without prophylactic anticoagulation was 37 and 25 days, respectively. The median survival times of patients with and without anticoagulation therapy were 69 and 30 days, respectively (p = 0.236). No procedure-related complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the symptom recurrence rates after inferior vena cava stent placement with or without prophylactic anticoagulation in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73503,"journal":{"name":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/95/2432-0935-8-2-0070.PMC10359174.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although percutaneous stent placement for malignant inferior vena cava syndrome is a highly feasible and effective treatment option, there is no clear evidence for the necessity of prophylactic anticoagulation therapy after inferior vena cava stent placement. This study retrospectively evaluated the necessity of prophylactic anticoagulation following inferior vena cava stent placement in patients with malignant inferior vena cava syndrome.

Methods: The data of 54 patients (28 men and 26 women; median age 61.2 years) with malignant inferior vena cava syndrome who received inferior vena cava stent placement between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Prophylactic anticoagulation was administered to 15 of 54 patients (27.8%) following stent placement. Symptom recurrence rates at 1 and 2 months after stent placement were compared between patients with and without prophylactic anticoagulation using Gray relational analysis. The timeline of symptom recurrence, survival time, and adverse events were also evaluated.

Results: At 1 and 2 months, symptom recurrence rates were 48.6% and 71.4%, respectively, in patients with prophylactic anticoagulation and 28.3% and 37.0%, respectively, in patients without prophylactic anticoagulation. The overall median follow-up duration was 27 days and that of the patients with and without prophylactic anticoagulation was 37 and 25 days, respectively. The median survival times of patients with and without anticoagulation therapy were 69 and 30 days, respectively (p = 0.236). No procedure-related complications occurred.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the symptom recurrence rates after inferior vena cava stent placement with or without prophylactic anticoagulation in this study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

癌症患者下腔静脉支架置入术后预防性抗凝治疗的必要性。
目的:虽然经皮支架置入术治疗恶性下腔静脉综合征是一种高度可行和有效的治疗方案,但没有明确的证据表明下腔静脉支架置入术后预防性抗凝治疗的必要性。本研究回顾性评价恶性下腔静脉综合征患者下腔静脉支架置入术后预防性抗凝的必要性。方法:54例患者(男28例,女26例;对2011年至2021年间接受下腔静脉支架置入术的恶性下腔静脉综合征患者进行回顾性分析。54例患者中有15例(27.8%)在支架置入术后接受预防性抗凝治疗。采用灰色关联分析比较预防性抗凝治疗和未预防性抗凝治疗患者支架置入术后1个月和2个月的症状复发率。对症状复发时间、生存时间和不良事件进行评估。结果:1和2个月时,预防性抗凝治疗组的症状复发率分别为48.6%和71.4%,未预防性抗凝治疗组的症状复发率分别为28.3%和37.0%。总体中位随访时间为27天,使用和未使用预防性抗凝治疗的患者分别为37天和25天。接受抗凝治疗和未接受抗凝治疗患者的中位生存时间分别为69天和30天(p = 0.236)。无手术相关并发症发生。结论:在本研究中,下腔静脉支架置入术后,预防性抗凝与不预防性抗凝在症状复发率上无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信