[Evaluation strategy of complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer].

J G Han, Z J Wang
{"title":"[Evaluation strategy of complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer].","authors":"J G Han,&nbsp;Z J Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230417-00171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, the standard of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for local advanced rectal cancer generally lacks pathological examination, the cCR judged by the current standard is still far from the real pathological complete response. After nCRT, due to the presence of tissue edema and fibrosis, MRI is highly uncertain in determining the staging of local lesions. The precision of colonoscopy biopsy is generally low because residual cancer foci exist primarily in the muscular layer, which limits the determination of cCR by colonoscopy biopsy. Local excision through the anus can resect the whole intestinal wall tissue, which is relatively accurate and close to the real state of remission of the lesion, but there are many problems, such as affecting anal function, high rate of complications, and increased difficulty of following radical surgery. Based on the present diagnosis of cCR, the authors put forward the concept of modified cCR (m-cCR) which combined with the pathological standard of transanal multipoint full-layer puncture biopsy. It is possible to improve the accuracy of cCR, and improve the safety of cCR patients who receive wait-and-watch therapy without increasing complications or affecting anal function. The exact conclusion needs to be confirmed by further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23966,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","volume":"61 9","pages":"738-743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230417-00171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, the standard of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for local advanced rectal cancer generally lacks pathological examination, the cCR judged by the current standard is still far from the real pathological complete response. After nCRT, due to the presence of tissue edema and fibrosis, MRI is highly uncertain in determining the staging of local lesions. The precision of colonoscopy biopsy is generally low because residual cancer foci exist primarily in the muscular layer, which limits the determination of cCR by colonoscopy biopsy. Local excision through the anus can resect the whole intestinal wall tissue, which is relatively accurate and close to the real state of remission of the lesion, but there are many problems, such as affecting anal function, high rate of complications, and increased difficulty of following radical surgery. Based on the present diagnosis of cCR, the authors put forward the concept of modified cCR (m-cCR) which combined with the pathological standard of transanal multipoint full-layer puncture biopsy. It is possible to improve the accuracy of cCR, and improve the safety of cCR patients who receive wait-and-watch therapy without increasing complications or affecting anal function. The exact conclusion needs to be confirmed by further studies.

[直肠癌症新辅助治疗后完全缓解的评价策略]。
目前,局部晚期癌症新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后临床完全反应(cCR)的标准普遍缺乏病理检查,目前标准判断的cCR与真正的病理完全反应仍有很大差距。nCRT后,由于存在组织水肿和纤维化,MRI在确定局部病变的分期方面非常不确定。结肠镜检查活组织检查的精度通常较低,因为残余癌症病灶主要存在于肌肉层,这限制了结肠镜检查活检对cCR的测定。经肛门局部切除可以切除整个肠壁组织,相对准确,接近病变缓解的真实状态,但存在影响肛门功能、并发症发生率高、后续根治手术难度增加等问题。根据cCR的诊断现状,结合经肛门多点全层穿刺活检的病理标准,提出改良cCR(m-cCR)的概念。在不增加并发症或影响肛门功能的情况下,可以提高cCR的准确性,并提高接受观望治疗的cCR患者的安全性。确切的结论需要进一步的研究来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信