Health and Care Data: Approaches to data linkage for evidence-informed policy.

Q1 Medicine
Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2023-07-01
Dimitra Panteli, Katherine Polin, Erin Webb, Sara Allin, Andrew Barnes, Alexander Degelsegger-Márquez, Saira Ghafur, Margaret Jamieson, Yoon Kim, Yulia Litvinova, Ulrike Nimptsch, Maari Parkkinen, Trine Aagren Rasmussen, Christoph Reichebner, Julia Röttger, Juliet Rumball-Smith, Giada Scarpetti, Anna Lene Seidler, Johanna Seppänen, Merran Smith, Morgan Snell, Dalibor Stanimirovic, Robert Verheij, Metka Zaletel, Reinhard Busse
{"title":"Health and Care Data: Approaches to data linkage for evidence-informed policy.","authors":"Dimitra Panteli, Katherine Polin, Erin Webb, Sara Allin, Andrew Barnes, Alexander Degelsegger-Márquez, Saira Ghafur, Margaret Jamieson, Yoon Kim, Yulia Litvinova, Ulrike Nimptsch, Maari Parkkinen, Trine Aagren Rasmussen, Christoph Reichebner, Julia Röttger, Juliet Rumball-Smith, Giada Scarpetti, Anna Lene Seidler, Johanna Seppänen, Merran Smith, Morgan Snell, Dalibor Stanimirovic, Robert Verheij, Metka Zaletel, Reinhard Busse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An indispensable prerequisite for answering research questions in health services research is the availability and accessibility of comprehensive, high-quality data. It can be assumed that health services research in the coming years will be increasingly based on data linkage, i.e., the linking, or connecting, of several data sources based on suitable common key variables. A range of approaches to data collection, storage, linkage and availability exists across countries, particularly for secondary research purposes (i.e., the use of data initially collected for other purposes), such as health systems research. The main goal of this review is to develop an overview of, and gain insights into, current approaches to linking data sources in the context of health services research, with the view to inform policy, based on existing practices in high-income countries in Europe and beyond. In doing so, another objective is to provide lessons for countries looking for possible or alternative approaches to data linkage. Thirteen country case studies of data linkage approaches were selected and analysed. Rather than being comprehensive, this review aimed to identify varied and potentially useful case studies to showcase different approaches to data linkage worldwide. A conceptual framework was developed to guide the selection and description of case studies. Information was first identified and collected from publicly available sources and a profile was then created for each country and each case study; these profiles were forwarded to appropriate country experts for validation and completion. The report presents an overview of the included countries and their case studies (Chapter 2), with key data per country and case study in the appendices. This is followed by a closer look at the possibilities of using routine data (Chapter 3); the different approaches to linkage (Chapter 4); the different access routes for researchers (Chapter 5); the use of data for research from electronic patient or health records (Chapter 6); foundational considerations related to data safety, privacy and governance (Chapter 7); recent developments in cross-border data sharing and the European Health Data Space (Chapter 8); and considerations of changes and responses catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic as related to the generation and secondary use of data (Chapter 9). The review ends with overall conclusions on the necessary characteristics of data to inform research relevant for policy and highlights some insights to inspire possible future solutions - less or more disruptive - for countries looking to expand their use of data (Chapter 10). It emphasises that investing in data linkage for secondary use will not only contribute to the strengthening of national health systems, but also promote international cooperation and contribute to the international visibility of scientific excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"25 2","pages":"1-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An indispensable prerequisite for answering research questions in health services research is the availability and accessibility of comprehensive, high-quality data. It can be assumed that health services research in the coming years will be increasingly based on data linkage, i.e., the linking, or connecting, of several data sources based on suitable common key variables. A range of approaches to data collection, storage, linkage and availability exists across countries, particularly for secondary research purposes (i.e., the use of data initially collected for other purposes), such as health systems research. The main goal of this review is to develop an overview of, and gain insights into, current approaches to linking data sources in the context of health services research, with the view to inform policy, based on existing practices in high-income countries in Europe and beyond. In doing so, another objective is to provide lessons for countries looking for possible or alternative approaches to data linkage. Thirteen country case studies of data linkage approaches were selected and analysed. Rather than being comprehensive, this review aimed to identify varied and potentially useful case studies to showcase different approaches to data linkage worldwide. A conceptual framework was developed to guide the selection and description of case studies. Information was first identified and collected from publicly available sources and a profile was then created for each country and each case study; these profiles were forwarded to appropriate country experts for validation and completion. The report presents an overview of the included countries and their case studies (Chapter 2), with key data per country and case study in the appendices. This is followed by a closer look at the possibilities of using routine data (Chapter 3); the different approaches to linkage (Chapter 4); the different access routes for researchers (Chapter 5); the use of data for research from electronic patient or health records (Chapter 6); foundational considerations related to data safety, privacy and governance (Chapter 7); recent developments in cross-border data sharing and the European Health Data Space (Chapter 8); and considerations of changes and responses catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic as related to the generation and secondary use of data (Chapter 9). The review ends with overall conclusions on the necessary characteristics of data to inform research relevant for policy and highlights some insights to inspire possible future solutions - less or more disruptive - for countries looking to expand their use of data (Chapter 10). It emphasises that investing in data linkage for secondary use will not only contribute to the strengthening of national health systems, but also promote international cooperation and contribute to the international visibility of scientific excellence.

健康与护理数据:为制定有依据的政策而建立数据联系的方法。
要回答医疗服务研究中的问题,一个不可或缺的先决条件就是要有全面、高质量的数 据,而且这些数据是可以获取的。可以假定,未来几年的卫生服务研究将越来越多地以数据链接为基础,即根据适当的共同关键变量将若干数据源链接或连接起来。各国在数据收集、储存、链接和提供方面有一系列方法,特别是用于二次研究目的(即使用最初为其他目的收集的数据),如卫生系统研究。本综述的主要目的是根据欧洲及欧洲以外高收入国家的现有做法,对目前在卫生服务研究中链接数据源的方法进行概述,并深入了解这些方法,以便为政策提供信息。这样做的另一个目的是为寻找数据链接的可能或替代方法的国家提供经验教训。我们选择并分析了 13 个国家的数据关联方法案例研究。这次审查并不全面,而是旨在确定各种可能有用的案例研究,以展示世界各地数据链接的不同方法。为指导案例研究的选择和描述,制定了一个概念框架。首先从公开来源确定和收集信息,然后为每个国家和每个案例研究创建简介;这些简介将转发给适当的国家专家进行验证和完善。本报告概述了所包含的国家及其案例研究(第 2 章),并在附录中提供了每个国家和案例研究的关键数据。随后,我们将仔细研究使用常规数据的可能性(第 3 章);建立联系的不同方法(第 4 章);研究人员获取数据的不同途径(第 5 章);使用电子病历或健康记录中的数据进行研究(第 6 章);与数据安全、隐私和治理相关的基本考虑因素(第 7 章);跨境数据共享和欧洲健康数据空间的最新发展(第 8 章);以及 COVID-19 大流行所引发的与数据生成和二次使用相关的变化和应对措施的考虑因素(第 9 章)。审查最后就数据的必要特征得出总体结论,以便为与政策相关的研究提供信息,并强调了一些见解,以启发那些希望扩大数据使用范围的国家未来可能采取的解决方案--破坏性较小或较大(第 10 章)。报告强调,投资于二次使用的数据链接不仅有助于加强国家卫生系统,还能促进国际合作,提高卓越科学的国际知名度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信