Relationship Between Cannabis Use and Immediate, Delayed, and Working Memory Performance Among Older Adults.

Madison Maynard, Daniel Paulson, Michael Dunn, Robert D Dvorak
{"title":"Relationship Between Cannabis Use and Immediate, Delayed, and Working Memory Performance Among Older Adults.","authors":"Madison Maynard,&nbsp;Daniel Paulson,&nbsp;Michael Dunn,&nbsp;Robert D Dvorak","doi":"10.26828/cannabis/2023/000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis is increasingly accessible and use is increasing rapidly among older adults as laws change and cannabis becomes more frequently prescribed in healthcare settings. Past research identified cognitive effects of cannabis use among adolescents and young adults that can persist for several weeks after intoxication, though little is known about how these effects generalize to older adults. Participants (<i>N</i> = 1348) were drawn from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and were categorized as current occasional users (up to once/week in the past year, <i>n</i> = 36), current frequent users (once per week or more in the past year, <i>n</i> = 92), past users (<i>n</i> = 334), and non-users (<i>n</i> = 886). Participant ages ranged from 50 to 98 (<i>M</i> = 67.25, <i>SD</i> = 10.68). Uncontrolled, one-way ANOVAs and controlled ANCOVAs were used to examine between-group differences on immediate and delayed wordlist memory and working memory (serial sevens). When controlling for age, gender, education, and minority status, current frequent users demonstrated significantly worse immediate memory performance compared to past and non-users. However, this difference could have been the result of acute, residual effects of past-month cannabis use among current users. In controlled analyses, there were no differences between groups on delayed or working memory. Findings indicate that greater than weekly cannabis use may result in attentional and short-term memory deficits. Further, these effects may be mitigated by sustained abstinence. Limitations including sample size and measures of cannabis use warrant future studies to replicate and build upon these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72520,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","volume":"6 2","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/00/rsmj.6.2.22.PMC10361803.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2023/000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannabis is increasingly accessible and use is increasing rapidly among older adults as laws change and cannabis becomes more frequently prescribed in healthcare settings. Past research identified cognitive effects of cannabis use among adolescents and young adults that can persist for several weeks after intoxication, though little is known about how these effects generalize to older adults. Participants (N = 1348) were drawn from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and were categorized as current occasional users (up to once/week in the past year, n = 36), current frequent users (once per week or more in the past year, n = 92), past users (n = 334), and non-users (n = 886). Participant ages ranged from 50 to 98 (M = 67.25, SD = 10.68). Uncontrolled, one-way ANOVAs and controlled ANCOVAs were used to examine between-group differences on immediate and delayed wordlist memory and working memory (serial sevens). When controlling for age, gender, education, and minority status, current frequent users demonstrated significantly worse immediate memory performance compared to past and non-users. However, this difference could have been the result of acute, residual effects of past-month cannabis use among current users. In controlled analyses, there were no differences between groups on delayed or working memory. Findings indicate that greater than weekly cannabis use may result in attentional and short-term memory deficits. Further, these effects may be mitigated by sustained abstinence. Limitations including sample size and measures of cannabis use warrant future studies to replicate and build upon these findings.

Abstract Image

大麻使用与老年人即时、延迟和工作记忆表现的关系。
随着法律的变化和医疗机构更频繁地开大麻处方,老年人越来越容易获得大麻,大麻的使用量也在迅速增加。过去的研究发现,大麻对青少年和年轻人的认知影响可以在中毒后持续数周,尽管人们对这些影响如何推广到老年人知之甚少。参与者(N = 1348)是从健康与退休研究(HRS)中抽取的,分为目前偶尔使用者(过去一年中每周最多一次,N = 36)、目前经常使用者(过去一年中每周一次或更多,N = 92)、过去使用者(N = 334)和非使用者(N = 886)。参与者年龄50 ~ 98岁(M = 67.25, SD = 10.68)。采用非受控、单因素方差分析(anova)和受控方差分析(ancova)来检验组间即时和延迟词表记忆和工作记忆的差异(序列7)。在控制年龄、性别、教育程度和少数民族身份的情况下,与过去和非用户相比,当前的频繁用户表现出明显更差的即时记忆表现。然而,这种差异可能是由于当前使用者过去一个月使用大麻的急性残余影响造成的。在对照分析中,两组在延迟记忆和工作记忆方面没有差异。研究结果表明,超过每周使用大麻可能导致注意力和短期记忆缺陷。此外,这些影响可以通过持续的禁欲来减轻。包括样本量和大麻使用措施在内的局限性保证了未来的研究可以复制和建立在这些发现的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信