Meghan Reading Turchioe, Sarah Harkins, Pooja Desai, Shiveen Kumar, Jessica Kim, Alison Hermann, Rochelle Joly, Yiye Zhang, Jyotishman Pathak, Natalie C Benda
{"title":"Women's perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in mental healthcare.","authors":"Meghan Reading Turchioe, Sarah Harkins, Pooja Desai, Shiveen Kumar, Jessica Kim, Alison Hermann, Rochelle Joly, Yiye Zhang, Jyotishman Pathak, Natalie C Benda","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate women's attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies used in mental health care. We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of U.S. adults reporting female sex at birth focused on bioethical considerations for AI-based technologies in mental healthcare, stratifying by previous pregnancy. Survey respondents (<i>n</i> = 258) were open to AI-based technologies in mental healthcare but concerned about medical harm and inappropriate data sharing. They held clinicians, developers, healthcare systems, and the government responsible for harm. Most reported it was \"very important\" for them to understand AI output. More previously pregnant respondents reported being told AI played a small role in mental healthcare was \"very important\" versus those not previously pregnant (<i>P</i> = .03). We conclude that protections against harm, transparency around data use, preservation of the patient-clinician relationship, and patient comprehension of AI predictions may facilitate trust in AI-based technologies for mental healthcare among women.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"ooad048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate women's attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies used in mental health care. We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of U.S. adults reporting female sex at birth focused on bioethical considerations for AI-based technologies in mental healthcare, stratifying by previous pregnancy. Survey respondents (n = 258) were open to AI-based technologies in mental healthcare but concerned about medical harm and inappropriate data sharing. They held clinicians, developers, healthcare systems, and the government responsible for harm. Most reported it was "very important" for them to understand AI output. More previously pregnant respondents reported being told AI played a small role in mental healthcare was "very important" versus those not previously pregnant (P = .03). We conclude that protections against harm, transparency around data use, preservation of the patient-clinician relationship, and patient comprehension of AI predictions may facilitate trust in AI-based technologies for mental healthcare among women.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
