Identification and Characterization of Pain Processing Patterns Among Patients With Chronic Primary Pain: A Replication.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alina Scheidegger, Joshua Jäger, Larissa T Blättler, Selma Aybek, Nina Bischoff, Martin Grosse Holtforth
{"title":"Identification and Characterization of Pain Processing Patterns Among Patients With Chronic Primary Pain: A Replication.","authors":"Alina Scheidegger,&nbsp;Joshua Jäger,&nbsp;Larissa T Blättler,&nbsp;Selma Aybek,&nbsp;Nina Bischoff,&nbsp;Martin Grosse Holtforth","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop individual and effective treatment plans for patients with chronic pain, we aimed to replicate Grolimund and colleagues' empirical categorization of chronic pain patients on a new and larger sample. Moreover, this work aimed to extend previous knowledge by considering various treatment outcomes and exploratorily analyzing which coping skills might be particularly relevant for treatment success in each subtype.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Latent class analysis was used to identify homogenous subtypes with different pain processing patterns using the pain processing questionnaire (FESV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By analyzing 602 inpatients with chronic primary pain, we identified 3 subtypes: (1) severely burdened individuals with low coping skills , (2) mildly burdened individuals with high coping skills , and (3) moderately burdened individuals with moderate coping skills. Pain interference, psychological distress, and cognitive and behavioral coping skills improved after treatment in all subtypes. Pain-related mental interference significantly improved only in subtypes (1) and (3). Only individuals of subtype (3) reported significant reductions in pain intensity after treatment. Exploratory regression analysis suggested that of subtype (1), the most promising targets in reducing pain interference and psychological distress posttreatment might be to foster relaxation techniques, counteractive activities, and cognitive restructuring . None of the FESV dimensions significantly predicted treatment outcomes among individuals of subtype (2). Individuals of subtype (3) might benefit the most from experiencing more competence during treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight the importance of identifying and characterizing subtypes of chronic primary pain patients and that these subtypes should be considered for individualized and effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":"39 8","pages":"414-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/7b/ajp-39-414.PMC10353533.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop individual and effective treatment plans for patients with chronic pain, we aimed to replicate Grolimund and colleagues' empirical categorization of chronic pain patients on a new and larger sample. Moreover, this work aimed to extend previous knowledge by considering various treatment outcomes and exploratorily analyzing which coping skills might be particularly relevant for treatment success in each subtype.

Materials and methods: Latent class analysis was used to identify homogenous subtypes with different pain processing patterns using the pain processing questionnaire (FESV).

Results: By analyzing 602 inpatients with chronic primary pain, we identified 3 subtypes: (1) severely burdened individuals with low coping skills , (2) mildly burdened individuals with high coping skills , and (3) moderately burdened individuals with moderate coping skills. Pain interference, psychological distress, and cognitive and behavioral coping skills improved after treatment in all subtypes. Pain-related mental interference significantly improved only in subtypes (1) and (3). Only individuals of subtype (3) reported significant reductions in pain intensity after treatment. Exploratory regression analysis suggested that of subtype (1), the most promising targets in reducing pain interference and psychological distress posttreatment might be to foster relaxation techniques, counteractive activities, and cognitive restructuring . None of the FESV dimensions significantly predicted treatment outcomes among individuals of subtype (2). Individuals of subtype (3) might benefit the most from experiencing more competence during treatment.

Discussion: Our findings highlight the importance of identifying and characterizing subtypes of chronic primary pain patients and that these subtypes should be considered for individualized and effective treatment.

Abstract Image

慢性原发性疼痛患者疼痛加工模式的识别和表征:一项重复研究。
为了为慢性疼痛患者制定个性化和有效的治疗方案,我们的目标是在一个新的更大的样本上复制Grolimund及其同事对慢性疼痛患者的经验分类。此外,这项工作旨在通过考虑各种治疗结果和探索性分析哪些应对技能可能与每个亚型的治疗成功特别相关,从而扩展先前的知识。材料与方法:采用疼痛加工问卷(FESV)进行潜在类分析,确定具有不同疼痛加工模式的同质亚型。结果:通过对602例慢性原发性疼痛住院患者的分析,我们确定了3个亚型:(1)应对能力低的重度负担组、(2)应对能力高的轻度负担组和(3)应对能力中等的中度负担组。所有亚型治疗后疼痛干扰、心理困扰、认知和行为应对技能均有所改善。疼痛相关的精神干扰仅在亚型(1)和(3)中显著改善。只有亚型(3)的个体报告治疗后疼痛强度显著降低。探索性回归分析表明,亚型(1)在减少疼痛干扰和治疗后心理困扰方面最有希望的目标可能是培养放松技术、对抗活动和认知重组。FESV各维度均不能显著预测亚型(2)个体的治疗结果。亚型(3)个体可能从治疗期间体验更多的能力中获益最多。讨论:我们的研究结果强调了识别和表征慢性原发性疼痛患者亚型的重要性,并且应该考虑这些亚型的个体化和有效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信