Offering and Returning Secondary Findings in the Context of Exome Sequencing for Hearing Loss: Clinicians' Views and Experiences.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Lauren Notini, Clara Gaff, Julian Savulescu, Danya F Vears
{"title":"Offering and Returning Secondary Findings in the Context of Exome Sequencing for Hearing Loss: Clinicians' Views and Experiences.","authors":"Lauren Notini,&nbsp;Clara Gaff,&nbsp;Julian Savulescu,&nbsp;Danya F Vears","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2022.2160507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ongoing debate regarding whether and under which circumstances secondary findings (SF) should be offered in the pediatric context. Although studies have examined patient perspectives on receiving SF, little research has been conducted examining the experiences of clinicians offering SF to parents of newborns receiving genomic sequencing for a recently diagnosed medical condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this, we conducted qualitative interviews exploring the views and experiences of 12 clinicians who offered SF to parents of infants who had diagnostic exome sequencing (ES) to identify the cause of their hearing loss. Interviews explored clinicians' accounts of parents' choices and decision-making about receiving SF, their views on whether and when to offer SF, their experiences returning SF, and any ethical challenges they encountered. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinicians reported parents who declined all SF often felt finding out about future conditions unrelated to their child's hearing loss may be unhelpful, or even harmful, or were overwhelmed by their child's diagnosis. Clinicians also reported that some parents chose SF because they felt obliged to, even if they did not want to receive them. They explained that while some parents experienced decision-making regarding SF as positive, for others, this process was challenging or distressing. While clinicians generally agreed SF should be offered, mainly to promote parental choice, most felt SF should be offered after disclosing diagnostic results, primarily to avoid overwhelming parents. Clinicians encountered several ethical challenges, including balancing parental autonomy with non-maleficence, wanting to report or not report certain SF, and questioning whether parents can make an autonomous choice regarding SF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings, which are novel as they relate to parents of young infants with a recent diagnosis of hearing loss, add new insights into clinicians' and parents' decision-making regarding SF in pediatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":"14 2","pages":"74-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2160507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There is ongoing debate regarding whether and under which circumstances secondary findings (SF) should be offered in the pediatric context. Although studies have examined patient perspectives on receiving SF, little research has been conducted examining the experiences of clinicians offering SF to parents of newborns receiving genomic sequencing for a recently diagnosed medical condition.

Methods: To address this, we conducted qualitative interviews exploring the views and experiences of 12 clinicians who offered SF to parents of infants who had diagnostic exome sequencing (ES) to identify the cause of their hearing loss. Interviews explored clinicians' accounts of parents' choices and decision-making about receiving SF, their views on whether and when to offer SF, their experiences returning SF, and any ethical challenges they encountered. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

Results: Clinicians reported parents who declined all SF often felt finding out about future conditions unrelated to their child's hearing loss may be unhelpful, or even harmful, or were overwhelmed by their child's diagnosis. Clinicians also reported that some parents chose SF because they felt obliged to, even if they did not want to receive them. They explained that while some parents experienced decision-making regarding SF as positive, for others, this process was challenging or distressing. While clinicians generally agreed SF should be offered, mainly to promote parental choice, most felt SF should be offered after disclosing diagnostic results, primarily to avoid overwhelming parents. Clinicians encountered several ethical challenges, including balancing parental autonomy with non-maleficence, wanting to report or not report certain SF, and questioning whether parents can make an autonomous choice regarding SF.

Conclusions: Our findings, which are novel as they relate to parents of young infants with a recent diagnosis of hearing loss, add new insights into clinicians' and parents' decision-making regarding SF in pediatrics.

在听力损失的外显子组测序的背景下提供和返回次要发现:临床医生的观点和经验。
背景:关于是否以及在何种情况下应在儿科背景下提供次要发现(SF)的争论正在进行。虽然有研究考察了患者对接受SF的看法,但很少有研究考察临床医生为新生儿父母提供SF的经验,这些新生儿父母接受了最近诊断出的疾病的基因组测序。方法:为了解决这个问题,我们进行了定性访谈,探讨了12名临床医生的观点和经验,他们为患有诊断性外显子组测序(ES)的婴儿的父母提供SF,以确定其听力损失的原因。访谈探讨了临床医生对父母关于接受科幻小说的选择和决策的描述,他们对是否以及何时提供科幻小说的看法,他们返回科幻小说的经历,以及他们遇到的任何道德挑战。对访谈进行录音、转录并采用归纳内容分析法进行分析。结果:临床医生报告说,拒绝所有SF的父母经常觉得发现与孩子听力损失无关的未来状况可能没有帮助,甚至有害,或者被孩子的诊断所淹没。临床医生还报告说,一些家长选择顺丰是因为他们觉得有义务这样做,即使他们不想收到顺丰。他们解释说,虽然一些家长认为SF是积极的,但对其他人来说,这个过程是具有挑战性或痛苦的。虽然临床医生普遍同意应该提供SF,主要是为了促进父母的选择,但大多数人认为SF应该在披露诊断结果后提供,主要是为了避免让父母不知所措。临床医生遇到了一些伦理上的挑战,包括平衡父母的自主权和非恶意行为,想要报告或不报告某些SF,以及质疑父母是否可以对SF做出自主选择。结论:我们的研究结果是新颖的,因为它们与最近诊断为听力损失的年幼婴儿的父母有关,为临床医生和父母对儿科SF的决策提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信