Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line Baricitinib in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Australian OPAL Data Set.

Sabina Ciciriello, Geoffrey Littlejohn, Tamas Treuer, Kathryn A Gibson, Ewa Haladyj, Peter Youssef, Paul Bird, Catherine O'Sullivan, Tegan Smith, Claire T Deakin
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line Baricitinib in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Australian OPAL Data Set.","authors":"Sabina Ciciriello,&nbsp;Geoffrey Littlejohn,&nbsp;Tamas Treuer,&nbsp;Kathryn A Gibson,&nbsp;Ewa Haladyj,&nbsp;Peter Youssef,&nbsp;Paul Bird,&nbsp;Catherine O'Sullivan,&nbsp;Tegan Smith,&nbsp;Claire T Deakin","doi":"10.1002/acr2.11577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze comparative treatment persistence for first-line baricitinib (BARI) versus first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and for first-line BARI initiated as monotherapy versus first-line BARI initiated with at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with RA who initiated BARI or TNFi as first-line biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2021, were identified in the OPAL data set. Drug survival times to 6, 12, and 24 months were analyzed using restricted mean survival time (RMST). Multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to address missing data and nonrandom treatment assignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 545 patients initiated first-line BARI, including 118 as monotherapy and 427 as csDMARD combination therapy. Three thousand five hundred patients initiated first-line TNFi. There was no difference in drug survival to 6 or 12 months for BARI compared with TNFi; differences in RMST were 0.02 months (95% CI: -0.08 to 0.013; P = 0.65) and 0.31 months (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.63; P = 0.06), respectively. Patients in the BARI group had 1.00 month (95% CI: 0.14 to 1.86; P = 0.02) longer drug survival to 24 months. There was no difference in drug survival for BARI monotherapy compared with combination therapy, with differences in RMST to 6, 12, and 24 months of -0.19 months (95% CI: -0.50 to 0.12; P = 0.12), -0.35 months (95% CI: -1.17 to 0.42; P = 0.41), and -0.56 months (95% CI: -2.66 to 1.54; P = 0.60), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this comparative analysis, treatment persistence up to 24 months was significantly longer for first-line BARI compared with TNFi, but the effect size of 1.00 month is not clinically meaningful. There was no difference in persistence for BARI monotherapy versus combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7084,"journal":{"name":"ACR Open Rheumatology","volume":"5 7","pages":"345-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d9/b3/ACR2-5-345.PMC10349226.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR Open Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze comparative treatment persistence for first-line baricitinib (BARI) versus first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and for first-line BARI initiated as monotherapy versus first-line BARI initiated with at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD).

Methods: Patients with RA who initiated BARI or TNFi as first-line biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2021, were identified in the OPAL data set. Drug survival times to 6, 12, and 24 months were analyzed using restricted mean survival time (RMST). Multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to address missing data and nonrandom treatment assignment.

Results: A total of 545 patients initiated first-line BARI, including 118 as monotherapy and 427 as csDMARD combination therapy. Three thousand five hundred patients initiated first-line TNFi. There was no difference in drug survival to 6 or 12 months for BARI compared with TNFi; differences in RMST were 0.02 months (95% CI: -0.08 to 0.013; P = 0.65) and 0.31 months (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.63; P = 0.06), respectively. Patients in the BARI group had 1.00 month (95% CI: 0.14 to 1.86; P = 0.02) longer drug survival to 24 months. There was no difference in drug survival for BARI monotherapy compared with combination therapy, with differences in RMST to 6, 12, and 24 months of -0.19 months (95% CI: -0.50 to 0.12; P = 0.12), -0.35 months (95% CI: -1.17 to 0.42; P = 0.41), and -0.56 months (95% CI: -2.66 to 1.54; P = 0.60), respectively.

Conclusion: In this comparative analysis, treatment persistence up to 24 months was significantly longer for first-line BARI compared with TNFi, but the effect size of 1.00 month is not clinically meaningful. There was no difference in persistence for BARI monotherapy versus combination therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

澳大利亚OPAL数据集中一线Baricitinib治疗类风湿关节炎患者的比较疗效
目的:分析类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者一线baricitinib (BARI)与一线肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗持续性的比较,以及一线BARI单药治疗与一线BARI联合至少一种常规合成疾病改善抗风湿药物(csDMARD)治疗的疗效对比。方法:从2015年10月1日至2021年9月30日,在OPAL数据集中确定了以BARI或TNFi作为一线生物或靶向合成DMARD的RA患者。使用限制平均生存时间(RMST)分析6、12和24个月的药物生存时间。采用多重输入和处理加权逆概率来解决缺失数据和非随机处理分配问题。结果:共有545例患者接受了一线BARI治疗,其中118例接受单药治疗,427例接受csDMARD联合治疗。3500名患者开始了一线TNFi治疗。与TNFi相比,BARI到6个月或12个月的药物生存期没有差异;RMST差异为0.02个月(95% CI: -0.08 ~ 0.013;P = 0.65)和0.31个月(95% CI: -0.02 ~ 0.63;P = 0.06)。BARI组患者为1.00个月(95% CI: 0.14 ~ 1.86;P = 0.02)延长药物生存期至24个月。BARI单药治疗与联合治疗的药物生存期无差异,RMST分别为-0.19个月和-0.50个月、12个月和24个月(95% CI: -0.50至0.12;P = 0.12), -0.35个月(95% CI: -1.17至0.42;P = 0.41)和-0.56个月(95% CI: -2.66至1.54;P = 0.60)。结论:在本对比分析中,一线BARI的治疗持续时间明显长于TNFi,但1.00个月的效应量没有临床意义。BARI单药治疗与联合治疗的持续性没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信