Predicting Features of Visceral Stent Failure in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1177/15266028231173309
Enrico Mancuso, Roshan Bootun, Philip W Stather, Michael Crawford, Michael Delbridge, Mohammad Tariq Ali, Wissam Al-Jundi
{"title":"Predicting Features of Visceral Stent Failure in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Enrico Mancuso, Roshan Bootun, Philip W Stather, Michael Crawford, Michael Delbridge, Mohammad Tariq Ali, Wissam Al-Jundi","doi":"10.1177/15266028231173309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Visceral stents in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) have a significant risk of complications and carry a considerable burden of reinterventions. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of visceral stent failure.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>A retrospective review of 75 consecutive FEVARs in a single center from 2013 to 2021 was undertaken. Data on mortality, stent failure, and reintervention pertaining to 226 visceral stents were collected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anatomical features including aortic neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, and angulation of target viscerals were obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Stent oversizing and intraprocedural complications were recorded. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to determine the length of cover of target vessels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only bridging stents through fenestrations to visceral vessels were considered; 28 (37%) cases had 4 visceral stents, 24 (32%) had 3, 19 (25%) had 2, 4 (5%) had 1. Thirty day mortality was 8%, a third of which was related to visceral stent complications. Intraprocedural complexity was documented during the cannulation of 8 (3.5%) target vessels, with a technical success rate of 98.7%. A significant endoleak or visceral stent failure was identified in 22 stents (9.8%) postoperatively, of which 7 (3%) had in-patient reintervention within 30 days. Further reinterventions at 1, 2, and 3 years were 12 (5.4%), 2 (1%), and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Most reinterventions were for renal stents (n=19, 86%). A smaller stent diameter and a shorter length of visceral stent were significant predictors of failure. No other anatomical feature or stent choice was found to be a significant predictor of failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modality of visceral stent failures varies, but renal stents with a smaller diameter and/or shorter length are more likely to fail over time. Their complications and reinterventions are common and carry a significant burden; therefore, close surveillance must be continued long term.Clinical impactWith this work we share the methodology adopted at our centre to treat juxtarenal aneurysm with FEVAR. Thanks to this detailed review of anatomical and technical features we provide guidance for endovascular surgeons to face hostile aneurysm with peculiar visceral vessels anatomy. With our findings will also motivate industries in their attempt to produce improved technologies able to overcome issues identified in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"389-397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231173309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Visceral stents in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) have a significant risk of complications and carry a considerable burden of reinterventions. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of visceral stent failure.

Materials: A retrospective review of 75 consecutive FEVARs in a single center from 2013 to 2021 was undertaken. Data on mortality, stent failure, and reintervention pertaining to 226 visceral stents were collected.

Methods: Anatomical features including aortic neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, and angulation of target viscerals were obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Stent oversizing and intraprocedural complications were recorded. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to determine the length of cover of target vessels.

Results: Only bridging stents through fenestrations to visceral vessels were considered; 28 (37%) cases had 4 visceral stents, 24 (32%) had 3, 19 (25%) had 2, 4 (5%) had 1. Thirty day mortality was 8%, a third of which was related to visceral stent complications. Intraprocedural complexity was documented during the cannulation of 8 (3.5%) target vessels, with a technical success rate of 98.7%. A significant endoleak or visceral stent failure was identified in 22 stents (9.8%) postoperatively, of which 7 (3%) had in-patient reintervention within 30 days. Further reinterventions at 1, 2, and 3 years were 12 (5.4%), 2 (1%), and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Most reinterventions were for renal stents (n=19, 86%). A smaller stent diameter and a shorter length of visceral stent were significant predictors of failure. No other anatomical feature or stent choice was found to be a significant predictor of failure.

Conclusions: The modality of visceral stent failures varies, but renal stents with a smaller diameter and/or shorter length are more likely to fail over time. Their complications and reinterventions are common and carry a significant burden; therefore, close surveillance must be continued long term.Clinical impactWith this work we share the methodology adopted at our centre to treat juxtarenal aneurysm with FEVAR. Thanks to this detailed review of anatomical and technical features we provide guidance for endovascular surgeons to face hostile aneurysm with peculiar visceral vessels anatomy. With our findings will also motivate industries in their attempt to produce improved technologies able to overcome issues identified in this paper.

开窗血管内动脉瘤修复中内脏支架失效的预测特征。
目的:开窗血管内主动脉修复(FEVAR)中的内脏支架有明显的并发症风险,并且有相当大的再干预负担。本研究的目的是确定术前和术中内脏支架失效的预测因素。资料:对2013年至2021年同一中心连续75例fevar进行回顾性分析。收集了226例内脏支架的死亡率、支架失效和再干预数据。方法:术前计算机断层扫描(CT)获得解剖特征,包括主动脉颈角、动脉瘤直径和靶脏器角。记录支架过大及术中并发症。分析术后CT扫描以确定靶血管的覆盖长度。结果:只考虑通过开窗到内脏血管的桥接支架;4个内脏支架28例(37%),3个24例(32%),2个19例(25%),1个4例(5%)。30天死亡率为8%,其中三分之一与内脏支架并发症有关。在8条(3.5%)靶血管插管过程中记录了术中复杂性,技术成功率为98.7%。术后22例(9.8%)支架出现明显的内漏或内脏支架失效,其中7例(3%)在30天内再次住院干预。在1年、2年和3年进一步的再干预分别为12例(5.4%)、2例(1%)和1例(0.4%)。大多数再干预是肾支架(n=19, 86%)。较小的支架直径和较短的内脏支架长度是失败的重要预测因素。没有发现其他解剖特征或支架选择是失败的重要预测因素。结论:内脏支架失效的方式各不相同,但随着时间的推移,直径较小和/或长度较短的肾脏支架更容易失效。它们的并发症和再干预很常见,负担沉重;因此,密切监测必须长期持续下去。临床影响:通过这项工作,我们分享了本中心采用FEVAR治疗动脉瘤旁动脉瘤的方法。通过对解剖和技术特征的详细回顾,我们为血管内外科医生面对具有特殊内脏血管解剖结构的恶性动脉瘤提供指导。我们的发现也将激励行业在他们的尝试中产生改进的技术,能够克服本文中确定的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信