Longitudinal changes in dopamine transporter uptake scans in progressive apraxia of speech

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rene L. Utianski , Nha Trang Thu Pham , Hugo Botha , Farwa Ali , Joseph R. Duffy , Heather M. Clark , Val J. Lowe , Jennifer L. Whitwell , Keith A. Josephs
{"title":"Longitudinal changes in dopamine transporter uptake scans in progressive apraxia of speech","authors":"Rene L. Utianski ,&nbsp;Nha Trang Thu Pham ,&nbsp;Hugo Botha ,&nbsp;Farwa Ali ,&nbsp;Joseph R. Duffy ,&nbsp;Heather M. Clark ,&nbsp;Val J. Lowe ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Whitwell ,&nbsp;Keith A. Josephs","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe qualitative and quantitative longitudinal changes in dopamine transporter uptake (DaT) scan findings in progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>DaTQUANT software was used to quantify uptake in the left and right caudate and putamen in DaT scans of 39 patients with PAOS, 19 with repeat scans. Clinical radiologic impressions were used as the gold standard for evaluating whether quantitative measures (z-score of left and right putamen and caudate uptake) aligned with gestalt impressions of DaT abnormalities and clinical impairments, cross-sectionally. Measures at first and last available DaT were used to evaluate change over time and the influence of qualitative abnormality at first visit on change over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cross-sectionally, 16/39 patients had abnormal DaT scans on visual read, with differences in all quantitative DaT measures between those with (ab)normal scans, but without differences in any clinical measures (apraxia of speech, aphasia, or parkinsonism). Three patients that had normal DaT scans at baseline were read as abnormal at subsequent visits, with coinciding change in quantitative measures. At the group level, across the 19 patients with repeat imaging, no statistical change in left or right caudate or putamen scores was observed despite progression of clinical indices. Abnormality at first visit did not statistically influence the rate of change over time, although trends were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Approximately 40–50% of patients with PAOS have or will develop DaT scans that may be visually read as abnormal. Quantitative measures of DaT match visual reads cross-sectionally, but may not map to clinical progression, including of parkinsonism, observed in these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/9a/main.PMC10282401.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112523000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To describe qualitative and quantitative longitudinal changes in dopamine transporter uptake (DaT) scan findings in progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) patients.

Methods

DaTQUANT software was used to quantify uptake in the left and right caudate and putamen in DaT scans of 39 patients with PAOS, 19 with repeat scans. Clinical radiologic impressions were used as the gold standard for evaluating whether quantitative measures (z-score of left and right putamen and caudate uptake) aligned with gestalt impressions of DaT abnormalities and clinical impairments, cross-sectionally. Measures at first and last available DaT were used to evaluate change over time and the influence of qualitative abnormality at first visit on change over time.

Results

Cross-sectionally, 16/39 patients had abnormal DaT scans on visual read, with differences in all quantitative DaT measures between those with (ab)normal scans, but without differences in any clinical measures (apraxia of speech, aphasia, or parkinsonism). Three patients that had normal DaT scans at baseline were read as abnormal at subsequent visits, with coinciding change in quantitative measures. At the group level, across the 19 patients with repeat imaging, no statistical change in left or right caudate or putamen scores was observed despite progression of clinical indices. Abnormality at first visit did not statistically influence the rate of change over time, although trends were observed.

Conclusions

Approximately 40–50% of patients with PAOS have or will develop DaT scans that may be visually read as abnormal. Quantitative measures of DaT match visual reads cross-sectionally, but may not map to clinical progression, including of parkinsonism, observed in these patients.

Abstract Image

进行性言语失用患者多巴胺转运蛋白摄取扫描的纵向变化
目的描述进行性言语失用症(PAOS)患者多巴胺转运蛋白摄取(DaT)扫描结果的定性和定量纵向变化。方法应用DaTQUANT软件对39例PAOS患者和19例重复扫描患者的DaT扫描中左右尾状核和壳核的摄取量进行量化。临床放射学印模被用作评估定量测量(左右壳核和尾状核摄取的z评分)是否与DaT异常和临床损伤的格式塔印模一致的金标准。首次和最后一次可用DaT的测量用于评估随时间的变化以及首次就诊时定性异常对随时间变化的影响。结果从横断面上看,16/39例患者的视觉阅读DaT扫描异常,在所有定量DaT测量方面与(ab)正常扫描的患者存在差异,但在任何临床测量方面(言语失用症、失语症或帕金森病)没有差异。三名在基线时DaT扫描正常的患者在随后的就诊中被解读为异常,同时定量测量也发生了变化。在组水平上,在19名重复成像的患者中,尽管临床指标有所进展,但未观察到左侧或右侧尾状核或壳核评分的统计变化。尽管观察到了趋势,但第一次就诊时的异常并未对随时间变化的速率产生统计学影响。结论大约40-50%的PAOS患者已经或将进行DaT扫描,这些扫描可能在视觉上被解读为异常。DaT的定量测量与横断面上的视觉读数相匹配,但可能无法映射到这些患者的临床进展,包括帕金森病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信