A Comparison of Near Strabismus Measurements with Different Fixation Targets.

Q3 Medicine
Liz Carson, Ian Clark, Robert LaRoche
{"title":"A Comparison of Near Strabismus Measurements with Different Fixation Targets.","authors":"Liz Carson,&nbsp;Ian Clark,&nbsp;Robert LaRoche","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>It has been reported there is a difference in the size of esodeviations when using letters compared to pictures or lights as a fixation target. In many clinics, small picture stickers are used as a target for preliterate or uncooperative children. In this study, experimental stickers with detailed pictures were compared to the Lang fixation cube and a monochromatic circle to assess their suitability as near fixation targets for the measurement of near deviations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Participants were 3-5 years of age and had an esodeviation. The near angle of deviation was measured using the three targets and compared to determine if treatment would be affected. Clinical significance is based on a difference of 5 prism diopters (PD) as this could potentially change the treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the study show no clinically significant difference when comparing the three near targets. The experimental sticker induced the most accommodation, followed by the Lang fixation cube and then the red circle sticker.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although none of the mean differences between the target comparisons reached the clinically significant threshold set, it should be considered that over one third of participants had a clinically significant difference in the esodeviation measurement at 33 cm when using the detailed picture sticker when compared to the red circle sticker.</p>","PeriodicalId":37288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility","volume":"73 3","pages":"77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: It has been reported there is a difference in the size of esodeviations when using letters compared to pictures or lights as a fixation target. In many clinics, small picture stickers are used as a target for preliterate or uncooperative children. In this study, experimental stickers with detailed pictures were compared to the Lang fixation cube and a monochromatic circle to assess their suitability as near fixation targets for the measurement of near deviations.

Patients and methods: Participants were 3-5 years of age and had an esodeviation. The near angle of deviation was measured using the three targets and compared to determine if treatment would be affected. Clinical significance is based on a difference of 5 prism diopters (PD) as this could potentially change the treatment plan.

Results: The results of the study show no clinically significant difference when comparing the three near targets. The experimental sticker induced the most accommodation, followed by the Lang fixation cube and then the red circle sticker.

Conclusion: Although none of the mean differences between the target comparisons reached the clinically significant threshold set, it should be considered that over one third of participants had a clinically significant difference in the esodeviation measurement at 33 cm when using the detailed picture sticker when compared to the red circle sticker.

不同注视目标近斜视测量的比较。
背景与目的:已有报道称,与图片或灯光作为注视目标相比,以字母作为注视目标时,视觉偏差的大小存在差异。在许多诊所里,小图片贴纸被用作文盲或不合作儿童的靶子。在本研究中,将带有详细图片的实验贴纸与Lang固定立方体和单色圆进行比较,以评估它们作为近固定目标测量近偏差的适用性。患者和方法:参与者年龄3-5岁,有内偏。使用三个靶标测量近偏角,并进行比较,以确定治疗是否会受到影响。临床意义是基于5棱镜屈光度(PD)的差异,因为这可能会改变治疗计划。结果:三种近靶点比较,研究结果无明显临床差异。实验贴纸诱导的适应性最强,Lang固定立方体次之,红圈贴纸次之。结论:虽然目标比较之间的平均差异均未达到具有临床意义的阈值设置,但应考虑超过三分之一的参与者在使用详细图片贴纸时与使用红圈贴纸相比,在33 cm处的内偏测量具有临床意义的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信