Public Officials' Engagement on Social Media During the Rollout of the COVID-19 Vaccine: Content Analysis of Tweets.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.2196/41582
Husayn Marani, Melodie Yunju Song, Margaret Jamieson, Monika Roerig, Sara Allin
{"title":"Public Officials' Engagement on Social Media During the Rollout of the COVID-19 Vaccine: Content Analysis of Tweets.","authors":"Husayn Marani,&nbsp;Melodie Yunju Song,&nbsp;Margaret Jamieson,&nbsp;Monika Roerig,&nbsp;Sara Allin","doi":"10.2196/41582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media is an important way for governments to communicate with the public. This is particularly true in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, during which government officials played a strong role in promoting public health measures such as vaccines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In Canada, provincial COVID-19 vaccine rollout was delivered in 3 phases aligned with federal government COVID-19 vaccine guidance for priority populations. In this study, we examined how Canadian public officials used Twitter to engage with the public about vaccine rollout and how this engagement has shaped public response to vaccines across jurisdictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a content analysis of tweets posted between December 28, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Leveraging the social media artificial intelligence tool Brandwatch Analytics, we constructed a list of public officials in 3 jurisdictions (Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia) organized across 6 public official types and then conducted an English and French keyword search for tweets about vaccine rollout and delivery that mentioned, retweeted, or replied to the public officials. We identified the top 30 tweets with the highest impressions in each jurisdiction in each of the 3 phases (approximately a 26-day window) of the vaccine rollout. The metrics of engagement (impressions, retweets, likes, and replies) from the top 30 tweets per phase in each jurisdiction were extracted for additional annotation. We specifically annotated sentiment toward public officials' vaccine responses (ie, positive, negative, and neutral) in each tweet and annotated the type of social media engagement. A thematic analysis of tweets was then conducted to add nuance to extracted data characterizing sentiment and interaction type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 6 categories of public officials, 142 prominent accounts were included from Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. In total, 270 tweets were included in the content analysis and 212 tweets were direct tweets by public officials. Public officials mostly used Twitter for information provision (139/212, 65.6%), followed by horizontal engagement (37/212, 17.5%), citizen engagement (24/212, 11.3%), and public service announcements (12/212, 5.7%). Information provision by government bodies (eg, provincial government and public health authorities) or municipal leaders is more prominent than tweets by other public official groups. Neutral sentiment accounted for 51.5% (139/270) of all the tweets, whereas positive sentiment was the second most common sentiment (117/270, 43.3%). In Ontario, 60% (54/90) of the tweets were positive. Negative sentiment (eg, public officials criticizing vaccine rollout) accounted for 12% (11/90) of all the tweets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As governments continue to promote the uptake of the COVID-19 booster doses, findings from this study are useful in informing how governments can best use social media to engage with the public to achieve democratic goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"3 ","pages":"e41582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/41582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media is an important way for governments to communicate with the public. This is particularly true in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, during which government officials played a strong role in promoting public health measures such as vaccines.

Objective: In Canada, provincial COVID-19 vaccine rollout was delivered in 3 phases aligned with federal government COVID-19 vaccine guidance for priority populations. In this study, we examined how Canadian public officials used Twitter to engage with the public about vaccine rollout and how this engagement has shaped public response to vaccines across jurisdictions.

Methods: We conducted a content analysis of tweets posted between December 28, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Leveraging the social media artificial intelligence tool Brandwatch Analytics, we constructed a list of public officials in 3 jurisdictions (Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia) organized across 6 public official types and then conducted an English and French keyword search for tweets about vaccine rollout and delivery that mentioned, retweeted, or replied to the public officials. We identified the top 30 tweets with the highest impressions in each jurisdiction in each of the 3 phases (approximately a 26-day window) of the vaccine rollout. The metrics of engagement (impressions, retweets, likes, and replies) from the top 30 tweets per phase in each jurisdiction were extracted for additional annotation. We specifically annotated sentiment toward public officials' vaccine responses (ie, positive, negative, and neutral) in each tweet and annotated the type of social media engagement. A thematic analysis of tweets was then conducted to add nuance to extracted data characterizing sentiment and interaction type.

Results: Among the 6 categories of public officials, 142 prominent accounts were included from Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. In total, 270 tweets were included in the content analysis and 212 tweets were direct tweets by public officials. Public officials mostly used Twitter for information provision (139/212, 65.6%), followed by horizontal engagement (37/212, 17.5%), citizen engagement (24/212, 11.3%), and public service announcements (12/212, 5.7%). Information provision by government bodies (eg, provincial government and public health authorities) or municipal leaders is more prominent than tweets by other public official groups. Neutral sentiment accounted for 51.5% (139/270) of all the tweets, whereas positive sentiment was the second most common sentiment (117/270, 43.3%). In Ontario, 60% (54/90) of the tweets were positive. Negative sentiment (eg, public officials criticizing vaccine rollout) accounted for 12% (11/90) of all the tweets.

Conclusions: As governments continue to promote the uptake of the COVID-19 booster doses, findings from this study are useful in informing how governments can best use social media to engage with the public to achieve democratic goals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19疫苗推出期间公职人员在社交媒体上的参与:推文的内容分析。
背景:社交媒体是政府与公众沟通的重要方式。在2019冠状病毒病大流行等危机时期尤其如此,在此期间,政府官员在推广疫苗等公共卫生措施方面发挥了重要作用。目的:在加拿大,按照联邦政府针对重点人群的COVID-19疫苗指南,分三个阶段开展了省级COVID-19疫苗推广工作。在这项研究中,我们研究了加拿大政府官员如何利用Twitter与公众就疫苗推出进行互动,以及这种互动如何影响公众对各司法管辖区疫苗的反应。方法:对2020年12月28日至2021年8月31日期间发布的推文进行内容分析。利用社交媒体人工智能工具Brandwatch Analytics,我们构建了3个司法管辖区(安大略省、阿尔伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省)的公职人员名单,组织了6种公职人员类型,然后对提及、转发或回复公职人员的有关疫苗推出和交付的推文进行了英语和法语关键词搜索。我们确定了在疫苗推出的3个阶段(大约26天的窗口期)中每个管辖区印象最高的前30条推文。从每个司法管辖区每个阶段的前30条推文中提取参与度指标(印象、转发、点赞和回复)以进行额外注释。我们特别在每条推文中注释了对公职人员疫苗反应的看法(即积极、消极和中立),并注释了社交媒体参与的类型。然后对推文进行主题分析,为提取的数据添加细微差别,以表征情绪和互动类型。结果:在6类公职人员中,来自安大略省、阿尔伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的142名知名人士被纳入。总共有270条推文被纳入内容分析,其中212条是公职人员的直接推文。公共官员主要使用Twitter提供信息(139/212,65.6%),其次是横向参与(37/212,17.5%)、公民参与(24/212,11.3%)和公共服务公告(12/212,5.7%)。政府机构(例如省政府和公共卫生当局)或市领导提供的信息比其他公职人员团体的推文更为突出。中性情绪占所有推文的51.5%(139/270),而积极情绪是第二常见的情绪(117/270,43.3%)。在安大略省,60%(54/90)的推文是积极的。负面情绪(例如,政府官员批评疫苗推出)占所有推文的12%(11/90)。结论:随着各国政府继续促进COVID-19加强剂的使用,本研究的结果有助于告知政府如何最好地利用社交媒体与公众互动,以实现民主目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信