Fresh arterial allograft as a replacement for an infected common femoral prosthetic graft and recurrent false aneurysm.

Q4 Medicine
M Pluchova, J Chlupac, L Janousek, J Froněk
{"title":"Fresh arterial allograft as a replacement for an infected common femoral prosthetic graft and recurrent false aneurysm.","authors":"M Pluchova,&nbsp;J Chlupac,&nbsp;L Janousek,&nbsp;J Froněk","doi":"10.33699/PIS.2023.102.2.75-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Replacing an infected vascular prosthetic conduit with an allograft is a possible solution of this complication given the low recurrence of infection. It is most commonly utilized for cases where the use of autologous tissue is not an option. We present the case of a 70-year-old patient who had undergone repeated vascular reconstructions in the right lower limb. He was admitted to our department due to a progressively growing mass in the right groin and subsequently placed on the waiting list for a fresh allograft. The patient had the infected false aneurysm and prosthetic material of the femoral bifurcation replaced with an arterial allograft. The previous femoral popliteal autovenous bypass graft was reimplanted into the allograft. There were signs of sepsis during the operation; however, the blood culture was negative. Cultures from neither the wound nor the drain revealed the presence of any bacteria. The patient was discharged on the seventh post-operative day with prophylactic antibiotics. An early followup confirmed that there were no signs of recurrent infection and that the reconstruction remained patent. Seven and half months after the surgery, the femoral popliteal bypass graft became occluded and a conservative approach was chosen. A small thrombosed false aneurysm of the graft was revealed two years after the surgery due to transient non-compliance of the patient to immunosuppression therapy. It was treated conservatively. Two and a half years after the surgery, the allograft still remains open and the limb is preserved.</p>","PeriodicalId":52413,"journal":{"name":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","volume":"102 2","pages":"75-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.2.75-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Replacing an infected vascular prosthetic conduit with an allograft is a possible solution of this complication given the low recurrence of infection. It is most commonly utilized for cases where the use of autologous tissue is not an option. We present the case of a 70-year-old patient who had undergone repeated vascular reconstructions in the right lower limb. He was admitted to our department due to a progressively growing mass in the right groin and subsequently placed on the waiting list for a fresh allograft. The patient had the infected false aneurysm and prosthetic material of the femoral bifurcation replaced with an arterial allograft. The previous femoral popliteal autovenous bypass graft was reimplanted into the allograft. There were signs of sepsis during the operation; however, the blood culture was negative. Cultures from neither the wound nor the drain revealed the presence of any bacteria. The patient was discharged on the seventh post-operative day with prophylactic antibiotics. An early followup confirmed that there were no signs of recurrent infection and that the reconstruction remained patent. Seven and half months after the surgery, the femoral popliteal bypass graft became occluded and a conservative approach was chosen. A small thrombosed false aneurysm of the graft was revealed two years after the surgery due to transient non-compliance of the patient to immunosuppression therapy. It was treated conservatively. Two and a half years after the surgery, the allograft still remains open and the limb is preserved.

新鲜动脉同种异体移植物替代感染的股骨假体移植物和复发性假动脉瘤。
考虑到感染复发率低,用同种异体移植物代替受感染的血管假体导管是解决这种并发症的可能方法。它最常用于不能使用自体组织的情况。我们提出的情况下,70岁的病人谁接受了反复血管重建在右下肢。由于右腹股沟肿块逐渐增大,他被收住到我科,随后被安排在等待新的同种异体移植的名单上。患者将感染的假动脉瘤和股骨分叉的假体材料替换为动脉异体移植物。先前的股腘自身静脉旁路移植物被移植到同种异体移植物中。术中有败血症的迹象;然而,血培养呈阴性。伤口和排水管的培养都没有发现任何细菌。患者于术后第7天出院,给予预防性抗生素治疗。早期随访证实没有复发感染的迹象,重建仍然通畅。术后7个半月,股腘动脉旁路移植术闭塞,选择保守入路。术后两年后,由于患者暂时不接受免疫抑制治疗,发现移植物的小血栓性假动脉瘤。治疗很保守。手术后两年半,同种异体移植物仍然开放,肢体得以保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rozhledy v Chirurgii
Rozhledy v Chirurgii Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信