How can we encourage the provision of early medical abortion in primary care? Results of a best-worst scaling survey.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marion Haas, Jody Church, Deborah J Street, Deborah Bateson, Danielle Mazza
{"title":"How can we encourage the provision of early medical abortion in primary care? Results of a best-worst scaling survey.","authors":"Marion Haas,&nbsp;Jody Church,&nbsp;Deborah J Street,&nbsp;Deborah Bateson,&nbsp;Danielle Mazza","doi":"10.1071/PY22130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Almost onein four women in Australia experience an unintended pregnancy during their lifetime; of these, approximately 30% currently end in abortion. Although early medical abortion (EMA) up to 9weeks gestation is becoming more widely available in Australia, it is still not commonly offered in primary care. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to the provision of EMA in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 150 general practitioners (GPs) and 150 registered nurses (RNs) working in Australia responded to a best-worst scaling survey designed to answer the following question: what are the most important facilitators and barriers to the provision of EMA in primary care?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs believe that the lack of clinical guidelines, the amount of information provision and counselling required, and the fact that women who are not their patients may not return for follow-up are the most important barriers. For RNs, these three barriers, together with the stigma of being known as being involved in the provision of EMA, are the most important barriers. The formation of a community of practice to support the provision of EMA was identified by both professions as the most important facilitator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having access to a community of practice, enhanced training and reducing stigma will encourage the provision of EMA. Although clinical guidelines are available, they need to be effectively disseminated, implemented and endorsed by peak bodies. Primary care practices should consider using task sharingand developing patient resources to facilitate the provision of information and counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Almost onein four women in Australia experience an unintended pregnancy during their lifetime; of these, approximately 30% currently end in abortion. Although early medical abortion (EMA) up to 9weeks gestation is becoming more widely available in Australia, it is still not commonly offered in primary care. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to the provision of EMA in primary care.

Methods: A sample of 150 general practitioners (GPs) and 150 registered nurses (RNs) working in Australia responded to a best-worst scaling survey designed to answer the following question: what are the most important facilitators and barriers to the provision of EMA in primary care?

Results: GPs believe that the lack of clinical guidelines, the amount of information provision and counselling required, and the fact that women who are not their patients may not return for follow-up are the most important barriers. For RNs, these three barriers, together with the stigma of being known as being involved in the provision of EMA, are the most important barriers. The formation of a community of practice to support the provision of EMA was identified by both professions as the most important facilitator.

Conclusions: Having access to a community of practice, enhanced training and reducing stigma will encourage the provision of EMA. Although clinical guidelines are available, they need to be effectively disseminated, implemented and endorsed by peak bodies. Primary care practices should consider using task sharingand developing patient resources to facilitate the provision of information and counselling.

我们如何鼓励在初级保健中提供早期药物流产?最佳最差尺度调查的结果。
背景:在澳大利亚,几乎四分之一的女性在其一生中经历过意外怀孕;其中,目前约有30%以堕胎告终。尽管妊娠9周的早期药物流产(EMA)在澳大利亚越来越普遍,但在初级保健中仍然不常见。本研究的目的是调查初级保健中提供EMA的障碍和促进因素。方法:在澳大利亚工作的150名全科医生(gp)和150名注册护士(RNs)的样本回答了一个最佳-最差量表调查,旨在回答以下问题:在初级保健中提供EMA的最重要的促进因素和障碍是什么?结果:全科医生认为,缺乏临床指南、信息提供和咨询需求的数量,以及不是他们病人的妇女可能不会回来随访是最重要的障碍。对于注册护士来说,这三个障碍,加上被认为参与提供EMA的耻辱,是最重要的障碍。形成一个实践社区来支持EMA的提供,这两个专业都认为是最重要的促进因素。结论:获得实践社区,加强培训和减少耻辱感将鼓励提供EMA。虽然有临床指南,但它们需要得到有效的传播、实施和高峰机构的认可。初级保健实践应考虑使用任务共享和开发患者资源来促进信息和咨询的提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信