Improving patient informed consent for haemophilia gene therapy: the case for change.

Therapeutic advances in rare disease Pub Date : 2021-09-26 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26330040211047244
Laurence Woollard, Richard Gorman, Dakota J Rosenfelt
{"title":"Improving patient informed consent for haemophilia gene therapy: the case for change.","authors":"Laurence Woollard,&nbsp;Richard Gorman,&nbsp;Dakota J Rosenfelt","doi":"10.1177/26330040211047244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy points to a coming transformation in the treatment of people living with haemophilia, promising sustained bleed control and potential improvement in quality of life. Nevertheless, the consequences of introducing new genetic material are not trivial. The perceived benefits should not minimise the challenges facing patients in understanding the long-term risks and providing a valid and meaningful informed consent, whether in a research or clinical setting. Informed consent is a fundamentally important doctrine in both medical ethics and health law, upholding an individual's right to define their personal goals and make their own autonomous choices. Patients should be enabled to recognise their clinical situation, understand the implications of treatment and integrate every facet of their life into their decision. This review describes informed consent processes for haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, factors affecting patients' decision making and the availability of patient-centred decision support interventions, to ensure that patients' interests are being protected. Regulatory guidance has been published for physicians and manufacturers in haemophilia on informed consent, including for gene therapy, while best-practice recommendations for patient-physician discussions are available. In all settings, however, communicating and presenting highly technical and complex therapeutic information is challenging, especially where multiple barriers to scientific knowledge and health literacy exist. We propose several evidence-informed strategies to enhance the consent procedure, such as utilising validated literacy and knowledge assessment tools as well as participatory learning environments over an extended period, to ensure that patients are fully cognisant of the consent they give or deny. Further research is needed to define new, creative approaches for patient education and the upholding of ethical values in the informed consent process for gene therapy. The lessons learnt and approaches developed within haemophilia could set the gold standard for good practice in ensuring ethical preparedness amidst advances in genetic therapies.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><i>Improving the informed consent process for people living with haemophilia considering gene therapy.</i> Gene therapy is the process of replacing faulty genes with healthy ones. In haemophilia, gene therapy involves introducing a working copy of the gene for the clotting factor that patients are missing. Following treatment, patients should begin producing their own clotting factor normally. However, people living with haemophilia (PwH) need to be fully informed regarding the potential benefits and risks of gene therapy and what this means for them, whether as part of a research study or routine medical care.Patients must be respected and supported to make decisions about their own health and wellbeing, recognising their legal and moral right to set personal goals and make treatment choices. For this to happen in practice, patients should be aware of their individual health needs, understand the effects of treatment and consider lifestyle preferences in relation to their decisions. This article attempts to describe how informed consent is obtained in haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, what affects a patient's ability to make decisions and the availability of information and support to respect and protect the interests of PwH.Regulators responsible for approving medical products have published guidance on informed consent for physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers in haemophilia, including for gene therapy. Recommendations have been made about the best ways for PwH to discuss gene therapy with their physicians. Yet, poor communication of complex topics, such as gene therapy, can be problematic, especially if patients lack the skills and confidence to understand and discuss the science, or for physicians with limited time in clinic.We propose strategies to improve the consent process, so patients can feel more able to make informed decisions about new treatments. Further research is needed to find new, creative approaches for educating patients and ensuring that the informed consent process for gene therapy in haemophilia is ethical.</p>","PeriodicalId":75218,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","volume":"2 ","pages":"26330040211047244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/62/10.1177_26330040211047244.PMC10032461.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040211047244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy points to a coming transformation in the treatment of people living with haemophilia, promising sustained bleed control and potential improvement in quality of life. Nevertheless, the consequences of introducing new genetic material are not trivial. The perceived benefits should not minimise the challenges facing patients in understanding the long-term risks and providing a valid and meaningful informed consent, whether in a research or clinical setting. Informed consent is a fundamentally important doctrine in both medical ethics and health law, upholding an individual's right to define their personal goals and make their own autonomous choices. Patients should be enabled to recognise their clinical situation, understand the implications of treatment and integrate every facet of their life into their decision. This review describes informed consent processes for haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, factors affecting patients' decision making and the availability of patient-centred decision support interventions, to ensure that patients' interests are being protected. Regulatory guidance has been published for physicians and manufacturers in haemophilia on informed consent, including for gene therapy, while best-practice recommendations for patient-physician discussions are available. In all settings, however, communicating and presenting highly technical and complex therapeutic information is challenging, especially where multiple barriers to scientific knowledge and health literacy exist. We propose several evidence-informed strategies to enhance the consent procedure, such as utilising validated literacy and knowledge assessment tools as well as participatory learning environments over an extended period, to ensure that patients are fully cognisant of the consent they give or deny. Further research is needed to define new, creative approaches for patient education and the upholding of ethical values in the informed consent process for gene therapy. The lessons learnt and approaches developed within haemophilia could set the gold standard for good practice in ensuring ethical preparedness amidst advances in genetic therapies.

Plain language summary: Improving the informed consent process for people living with haemophilia considering gene therapy. Gene therapy is the process of replacing faulty genes with healthy ones. In haemophilia, gene therapy involves introducing a working copy of the gene for the clotting factor that patients are missing. Following treatment, patients should begin producing their own clotting factor normally. However, people living with haemophilia (PwH) need to be fully informed regarding the potential benefits and risks of gene therapy and what this means for them, whether as part of a research study or routine medical care.Patients must be respected and supported to make decisions about their own health and wellbeing, recognising their legal and moral right to set personal goals and make treatment choices. For this to happen in practice, patients should be aware of their individual health needs, understand the effects of treatment and consider lifestyle preferences in relation to their decisions. This article attempts to describe how informed consent is obtained in haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, what affects a patient's ability to make decisions and the availability of information and support to respect and protect the interests of PwH.Regulators responsible for approving medical products have published guidance on informed consent for physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers in haemophilia, including for gene therapy. Recommendations have been made about the best ways for PwH to discuss gene therapy with their physicians. Yet, poor communication of complex topics, such as gene therapy, can be problematic, especially if patients lack the skills and confidence to understand and discuss the science, or for physicians with limited time in clinic.We propose strategies to improve the consent process, so patients can feel more able to make informed decisions about new treatments. Further research is needed to find new, creative approaches for educating patients and ensuring that the informed consent process for gene therapy in haemophilia is ethical.

Abstract Image

改善患者对血友病基因治疗的知情同意:改变的理由。
基于腺相关病毒的基因治疗表明,血友病患者的治疗即将发生转变,有望持续控制出血,并有可能提高生活质量。然而,引入新的遗传物质的后果并非微不足道。无论是在研究还是临床环境中,感知到的益处都不应将患者在理解长期风险和提供有效和有意义的知情同意方面面临的挑战降至最低。知情同意是医学伦理和卫生法中一项至关重要的原则,维护个人确定个人目标和自主选择的权利。应使患者能够认识到自己的临床情况,了解治疗的影响,并将生活的方方面面融入决策中。这篇综述描述了血友病基因治疗临床试验的知情同意程序、影响患者决策的因素以及以患者为中心的决策支持干预措施的可用性,以确保患者的利益得到保护。已经为血友病医生和制造商发布了关于知情同意(包括基因治疗)的监管指南,同时还提供了关于患者和医生讨论的最佳实践建议。然而,在所有情况下,交流和呈现高度技术性和复杂的治疗信息都是具有挑战性的,尤其是在科学知识和健康素养存在多重障碍的情况下。我们提出了几种基于证据的策略来加强同意程序,例如使用经过验证的识字和知识评估工具以及长期的参与式学习环境,以确保患者充分认识到他们给予或拒绝的同意。需要进一步的研究来确定新的、创造性的方法来进行患者教育,并在基因治疗的知情同意过程中维护伦理价值观。血友病的经验教训和方法可以为确保在基因治疗进步的情况下做好道德准备的良好做法树立黄金标准。简明的语言总结:考虑基因治疗改善血友病患者的知情同意程序。基因治疗是用健康的基因替换有缺陷的基因的过程。在血友病中,基因治疗包括引入患者缺失的凝血因子基因的工作拷贝。治疗后,患者应开始正常产生自身的凝血因子。然而,无论是作为研究还是常规医疗的一部分,血友病患者都需要充分了解基因治疗的潜在益处和风险,以及这对他们意味着什么。必须尊重和支持患者就自己的健康和福祉做出决定,承认他们设定个人目标和做出治疗选择的法律和道德权利。为了在实践中实现这一点,患者应该意识到他们的个人健康需求,了解治疗的效果,并在做出决定时考虑生活方式偏好。本文试图描述在血友病基因治疗临床试验中如何获得知情同意,影响患者做出决策的能力以及信息和支持的可用性,以尊重和保护普华永道的利益。负责批准医疗产品的监管机构已经发布了血友病医生和制药商知情同意指南,包括基因治疗指南。已经就普华永道与医生讨论基因治疗的最佳方式提出了建议。然而,基因治疗等复杂话题的沟通不畅可能会带来问题,尤其是如果患者缺乏理解和讨论科学的技能和信心,或者对于临床时间有限的医生来说。我们提出了改进同意程序的策略,使患者能够对新的治疗方法做出更明智的决定。需要进一步的研究来寻找新的、创造性的方法来教育患者,并确保血友病基因治疗的知情同意程序是合乎道德的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信