Faculty and Resident Perspectives of the Complexity of Wellness Program Implementation: A Qualitative Exploration.

Jill Schneiderhan, Thomas Bishop, Timothy C Guetterman, Meg Dobson
{"title":"Faculty and Resident Perspectives of the Complexity of Wellness Program Implementation: A Qualitative Exploration.","authors":"Jill Schneiderhan,&nbsp;Thomas Bishop,&nbsp;Timothy C Guetterman,&nbsp;Meg Dobson","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.413534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Developing and implementing a wellness curriculum in a family medicine residency program is a complex process. We developed and implemented a new wellness curriculum in line with the national wellness conversation with a focus on the allocation of dedicated resources, the use of evidence-informed interventions, and the goal to be responsive to the feedback of both residents and residency leadership. Our research aim was to better understand the complexity of wellness curriculum implementation with a focus on identification of challenges to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a wellness program with structured curricular elements initially focused on evidence-informed skill development that iterated after year 1 to include more process-oriented elements. For the years 2016-2019 we collected and analyzed qualitative, open-ended survey questions, anonymous resident curriculum feedback, and faculty observation forms to assess resident and faculty perspectives on the new curriculum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-three survey invitations were sent with 122 total responses (66.7% response rate). Forty-eight of 56 residents responded to at least one survey. We analyzed responses along with the additional qualitative data that revealed several themes impacting the work of residency wellness curriculum implementation. These included how to manage curricular time, where the locus of control for the curricular content resides, and how residents and faculty differ in their definitions of wellness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We believe programs will be well positioned if they further investigate the complex structures at play that influence residency wellness, including both systemic factors and individual and community level interventions, and design curriculum that is well-defined, includes essential elements, and is informed by resident participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351434/pdf/primer-7-16.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.413534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Developing and implementing a wellness curriculum in a family medicine residency program is a complex process. We developed and implemented a new wellness curriculum in line with the national wellness conversation with a focus on the allocation of dedicated resources, the use of evidence-informed interventions, and the goal to be responsive to the feedback of both residents and residency leadership. Our research aim was to better understand the complexity of wellness curriculum implementation with a focus on identification of challenges to implementation.

Methods: We developed a wellness program with structured curricular elements initially focused on evidence-informed skill development that iterated after year 1 to include more process-oriented elements. For the years 2016-2019 we collected and analyzed qualitative, open-ended survey questions, anonymous resident curriculum feedback, and faculty observation forms to assess resident and faculty perspectives on the new curriculum.

Results: One hundred eighty-three survey invitations were sent with 122 total responses (66.7% response rate). Forty-eight of 56 residents responded to at least one survey. We analyzed responses along with the additional qualitative data that revealed several themes impacting the work of residency wellness curriculum implementation. These included how to manage curricular time, where the locus of control for the curricular content resides, and how residents and faculty differ in their definitions of wellness.

Conclusions: We believe programs will be well positioned if they further investigate the complex structures at play that influence residency wellness, including both systemic factors and individual and community level interventions, and design curriculum that is well-defined, includes essential elements, and is informed by resident participation.

教师和住院医师对健康计划实施复杂性的看法:定性探索。
在家庭医学住院医师项目中发展和实施健康课程是一个复杂的过程。根据国家健康对话,我们开发并实施了新的健康课程,重点是分配专用资源,使用循证干预措施,目标是对住院医生和住院医生领导的反馈做出反应。我们的研究目的是更好地理解健康课程实施的复杂性,重点是确定实施的挑战。方法:我们开发了一个健康项目,其中有结构化的课程元素,最初侧重于循证技能的发展,在一年后迭代,包括更多以过程为导向的元素。在2016-2019年,我们收集并分析了定性的开放式调查问题、匿名的住校学生课程反馈和教师观察表格,以评估住校学生和教师对新课程的看法。结果:共发出问卷邀请183份,回复122份,回复率66.7%。56名居民中有48人至少回答了一项调查。我们分析了反馈以及其他定性数据,这些数据揭示了影响住院医师健康课程实施工作的几个主题。其中包括如何管理课程时间,课程内容的控制点在哪里,以及住院医生和教师对健康的定义有何不同。结论:我们相信,如果项目能进一步调查影响住院医师健康的复杂结构,包括系统因素、个人和社区层面的干预措施,并设计明确的课程,包括基本要素,并由住院医师参与,那么项目就能定位得很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信