Christopher S Hollenbeak, Daniel J Henning, Glenn K Geeting, Nathan A Ledeboer, Imran A Faruqi, Christi G Pierce, Christopher B Thomas, Hollis R O'Neal
{"title":"Costs and Consequences of a Novel Emergency Department Sepsis Diagnostic Test: The IntelliSep Index.","authors":"Christopher S Hollenbeak, Daniel J Henning, Glenn K Geeting, Nathan A Ledeboer, Imran A Faruqi, Christi G Pierce, Christopher B Thomas, Hollis R O'Neal","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis causes 270,000 deaths and costs $38 billion annually in the United States. Most cases of sepsis present in the emergency department (ED), where rapid diagnosis remains challenging. The IntelliSep Index (ISI) is a novel diagnostic test that analyzes characteristics of WBC structure and provides a reliable early signal for sepsis. This study performs a cost-consequence analysis of the ISI relative to procalcitonin for early sepsis diagnosis in the ED.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>U.S. healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community hospital ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A decision tree analysis was performed comparing ISI with procalcitonin. Model parameters included prevalence of sepsis, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests (both ISI and procalcitonin), costs of hospitalization, and mortality rate stratified by diagnostic test result. Mortality and prevalence of sepsis were estimated from best available literature. Costs were estimated based on an analysis of a large, national discharge dataset, and adjusted to 2018 U.S. dollars. Outcomes included expected costs and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assuming a confirmed sepsis prevalence of 16.9% (adjudicated to Sepsis-3), the ISI strategy had an expected cost per patient of $3,849 and expected survival rate of 95.08%, whereas the procalcitonin strategy had an expected cost of $4,656 per patient and an expected survival of 94.98%. ISI was both less costly and more effective than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ISI was both less costly and more effective in preventing mortality than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. The ISI may provide health systems with a higher-value diagnostic test in ED sepsis evaluation. Additional work is needed to validate these results in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0942"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/9a/cc9-5-e0942.PMC10351935.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Sepsis causes 270,000 deaths and costs $38 billion annually in the United States. Most cases of sepsis present in the emergency department (ED), where rapid diagnosis remains challenging. The IntelliSep Index (ISI) is a novel diagnostic test that analyzes characteristics of WBC structure and provides a reliable early signal for sepsis. This study performs a cost-consequence analysis of the ISI relative to procalcitonin for early sepsis diagnosis in the ED.
Perspective: U.S. healthcare system.
Setting: Community hospital ED.
Methods: A decision tree analysis was performed comparing ISI with procalcitonin. Model parameters included prevalence of sepsis, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests (both ISI and procalcitonin), costs of hospitalization, and mortality rate stratified by diagnostic test result. Mortality and prevalence of sepsis were estimated from best available literature. Costs were estimated based on an analysis of a large, national discharge dataset, and adjusted to 2018 U.S. dollars. Outcomes included expected costs and survival.
Results: Assuming a confirmed sepsis prevalence of 16.9% (adjudicated to Sepsis-3), the ISI strategy had an expected cost per patient of $3,849 and expected survival rate of 95.08%, whereas the procalcitonin strategy had an expected cost of $4,656 per patient and an expected survival of 94.98%. ISI was both less costly and more effective than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: ISI was both less costly and more effective in preventing mortality than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. The ISI may provide health systems with a higher-value diagnostic test in ED sepsis evaluation. Additional work is needed to validate these results in clinical practice.
在美国,败血症每年导致27万人死亡,耗资380亿美元。大多数败血症病例出现在急诊科(ED),在那里快速诊断仍然具有挑战性。IntelliSep Index (ISI)是一种新型的诊断测试,可以分析白细胞结构特征,为脓毒症提供可靠的早期信号。本研究对ISI相对于降钙素原在ed中的早期败血症诊断进行了成本-后果分析。方法:采用决策树分析法对ISI与降钙素原进行比较。模型参数包括脓毒症的患病率、诊断测试(ISI和降钙素原)的敏感性和特异性、住院费用以及根据诊断测试结果分层的死亡率。脓毒症的死亡率和患病率是根据现有的最佳文献估计的。成本是根据对大型国家排放数据集的分析估算的,并调整为2018年的美元。结果包括预期成本和生存。结果:假设确诊的脓毒症患病率为16.9%(判定为脓毒症-3),ISI策略的预期成本为每位患者3849美元,预期生存率为95.08%,而降钙素原策略的预期成本为每位患者4656美元,预期生存率为94.98%。ISI比降钙素原成本更低,效果更好,主要是因为假阴性结果更少。这些结果在敏感性分析中是稳健的。结论:ISI在预防死亡率方面比降钙素原成本更低,但更有效,主要是因为假阴性结果更少。ISI可以为卫生系统提供ED脓毒症评估中更高价值的诊断测试。需要进一步的工作来在临床实践中验证这些结果。