Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis need for lead extraction whatever the device according to the ESC EORP EURO-ENDO registry.

Erwan Donal, Christophe Tribouilloy, Anita Sadeghpour, Cécile Laroche, Ana Clara Tude Rodrigues, Maria do Carmo Pereira Nunes, Duk-Hyun Kang, Marta Hernadez-Meneses, Zhanna Kobalava, Michele De Bonis, Rafal Dworakowski, Branislava Ivanovic, Maria Holicka, Takeshi Kitai, Ines Cruz, Olivier Huttin, Paolo Colonna, Patrizio Lancellotti, Gilbert Habib
{"title":"Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis need for lead extraction whatever the device according to the ESC EORP EURO-ENDO registry.","authors":"Erwan Donal,&nbsp;Christophe Tribouilloy,&nbsp;Anita Sadeghpour,&nbsp;Cécile Laroche,&nbsp;Ana Clara Tude Rodrigues,&nbsp;Maria do Carmo Pereira Nunes,&nbsp;Duk-Hyun Kang,&nbsp;Marta Hernadez-Meneses,&nbsp;Zhanna Kobalava,&nbsp;Michele De Bonis,&nbsp;Rafal Dworakowski,&nbsp;Branislava Ivanovic,&nbsp;Maria Holicka,&nbsp;Takeshi Kitai,&nbsp;Ines Cruz,&nbsp;Olivier Huttin,&nbsp;Paolo Colonna,&nbsp;Patrizio Lancellotti,&nbsp;Gilbert Habib","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is a severe complication of cardiac device (CD) implantation and is usually treated by antibiotic therapy and percutaneous device extraction. Few studies report the management and prognosis of CDRIE in real life. In particular, the rate of device extraction in clinical practice and the management of patients with left heart infective endocarditis (LHIE) and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) are not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We sought to study in EURO-ENDO, the characteristics, prognosis, and management of 483 patients with a CD included in the European Society of Cardiology EurObservational Research Programme EURO-ENDO registry. Three populations were compared: 280 isolated CDRIE (66.7 ± 14.3 years), 157 patients with LHIE and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) (71.1 ± 13.6), and 46 patients with both LHIE and CDRIE (LHIE+CDRIE+) (70.2 ± 10.1). Echocardiography was not always transoesophageal echography (TOE); it was transthoracic echography (TTE) for isolated CDRIE in 88.4% (TOE = 67.6%), for LHIE+CDRIE- TTE = 93.0% (TOE = 58.6%), and for CDRIE+LHIE+ TTE = 87.0% (TOE = 63.0%). Nuclear imaging was performed in 135 patients (positive for 75.6%). In-hospital mortality was lower in isolated CDRIE 13.2% vs. 22.3% and 30.4% for LHIE+CDRIE- and LHIE+CDRIE+ (<i>P</i> = 0004). Device extraction was performed in 62.1% patients with isolated CDRIE, 10.2% of LHIE+CDRIE- patients, and 45.7% of CDRIE+LHIE+ patients. Device extraction was associated with a better prognosis [hazard ratio 0.59 (0.40-0.87), <i>P</i> = 0.0068] even in the LHIE+CDRIE- group (<i>P</i> = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prognosis of endocarditis in patients with a CD remains poor, particularly in the presence of an associated LHIE. Although recommended by guidelines, device extraction is not always performed. Device removal was associated with better prognosis, even in the LHIE+CDRIE- group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/60/oead064.PMC10351571.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is a severe complication of cardiac device (CD) implantation and is usually treated by antibiotic therapy and percutaneous device extraction. Few studies report the management and prognosis of CDRIE in real life. In particular, the rate of device extraction in clinical practice and the management of patients with left heart infective endocarditis (LHIE) and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) are not well described.

Methods and results: We sought to study in EURO-ENDO, the characteristics, prognosis, and management of 483 patients with a CD included in the European Society of Cardiology EurObservational Research Programme EURO-ENDO registry. Three populations were compared: 280 isolated CDRIE (66.7 ± 14.3 years), 157 patients with LHIE and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) (71.1 ± 13.6), and 46 patients with both LHIE and CDRIE (LHIE+CDRIE+) (70.2 ± 10.1). Echocardiography was not always transoesophageal echography (TOE); it was transthoracic echography (TTE) for isolated CDRIE in 88.4% (TOE = 67.6%), for LHIE+CDRIE- TTE = 93.0% (TOE = 58.6%), and for CDRIE+LHIE+ TTE = 87.0% (TOE = 63.0%). Nuclear imaging was performed in 135 patients (positive for 75.6%). In-hospital mortality was lower in isolated CDRIE 13.2% vs. 22.3% and 30.4% for LHIE+CDRIE- and LHIE+CDRIE+ (P = 0004). Device extraction was performed in 62.1% patients with isolated CDRIE, 10.2% of LHIE+CDRIE- patients, and 45.7% of CDRIE+LHIE+ patients. Device extraction was associated with a better prognosis [hazard ratio 0.59 (0.40-0.87), P = 0.0068] even in the LHIE+CDRIE- group (P = 0.047).

Conclusion: Prognosis of endocarditis in patients with a CD remains poor, particularly in the presence of an associated LHIE. Although recommended by guidelines, device extraction is not always performed. Device removal was associated with better prognosis, even in the LHIE+CDRIE- group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

根据ESC EORP EURO-ENDO注册表,与心脏装置相关的感染性心内膜炎需要铅提取,无论设备是什么。
目的:心脏装置相关性感染性心内膜炎(CDRIE)是心脏装置(CD)植入的严重并发症,通常通过抗生素治疗和经皮取出装置来治疗。很少有研究报道CDRIE在现实生活中的管理和预后。特别是,临床实践中器械取出率和左心感染性心内膜炎(LHIE)和明显非感染性CD (LHIE+CDRIE-)患者的处理没有得到很好的描述。方法和结果:我们试图在EURO-ENDO中研究纳入欧洲心脏病学会欧洲观察研究计划EURO-ENDO注册的483例CD患者的特征、预后和管理。比较三个人群:分离CDRIE 280例(66.7±14.3年),LHIE合并明显未感染CD 157例(LHIE+CDRIE-)(71.1±13.6),LHIE合并CDRIE 46例(LHIE+CDRIE+)(70.2±10.1)。超声心动图并不总是经食管超声(TOE);单纯CDRIE经胸超声检查占88.4% (TOE = 67.6%), LHIE+CDRIE- TTE = 93.0% (TOE = 58.6%), CDRIE+LHIE+ TTE = 87.0% (TOE = 63.0%)。135例(75.6%)患者行核显像检查。单独CDRIE组的住院死亡率较低,分别为13.2%,而LHIE+CDRIE-和LHIE+CDRIE+组分别为22.3%和30.4% (P = 0004)。62.1%的孤立CDRIE患者、10.2%的LHIE+CDRIE-患者和45.7%的CDRIE+LHIE+患者进行了器械提取。即使在LHIE+CDRIE-组(P = 0.047),拔出器械与较好的预后相关[危险比0.59 (0.40-0.87),P = 0.0068]。结论:CD患者心内膜炎的预后仍然很差,特别是在伴有LHIE的情况下。尽管指南推荐,但并不总是执行器械提取。即使在LHIE+CDRIE-组中,器械移除与更好的预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信