Validation of the LPA-SQUASH in post-liver-transplant patients

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Miyuki Ushio, Kiyoko Makimoto, Kimie Fujita, Satomi Tanaka, Maki Kanaoka, Yukiko Kosai, Noboru Harada
{"title":"Validation of the LPA-SQUASH in post-liver-transplant patients","authors":"Miyuki Ushio,&nbsp;Kiyoko Makimoto,&nbsp;Kimie Fujita,&nbsp;Satomi Tanaka,&nbsp;Maki Kanaoka,&nbsp;Yukiko Kosai,&nbsp;Noboru Harada","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to validate the revised Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (SQUASH) to measure sedentary activity in post-liver-transplant patients. The proposed scale could be useful for transplantation nurses to assess and modify sedentary lifestyles and increase physical activity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SQUASH was modified to include items on sitting time and light-intensity physical activity (LPA-SQUASH). A pilot study was conducted with 20 liver transplant patients, and an expert panel validated the scale contents. Then, post-liver-transplant outpatients at a Japanese university hospital participated in the main study (September–October 2020), in which questionnaires were mailed twice to assess test–retest reliability, and accelerometers used to establish criterion validity. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for test–retest reliability. Spearman correlations and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess validity and measurement error.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 173 participants returned the questionnaires, and 106 and 71 completed the reliability and validation studies, respectively. The range of LPA-SQUASH correlation coefficients for test–retest was .49–.58. ICCs ranged from .72 to .80 for items other than leisure. Accelerometer data and the LPA-SQUASH total physical activity amount and light-intensity physical activity correlated moderately.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We modified the SQUASH, which was developed to measure physical activity in healthy adults, to assess light-intensity physical activity in post-liver-transplant patients. The LPA-SQUASH showed acceptable validity and reliability. The questionnaire may be used by transplantation nurses to examine light-intensity physical activity content/duration, deliver patient education considering patients' sedentary lifestyle, and facilitate goal setting for physical activity interventions to prevent metabolic syndrome.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.12540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to validate the revised Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (SQUASH) to measure sedentary activity in post-liver-transplant patients. The proposed scale could be useful for transplantation nurses to assess and modify sedentary lifestyles and increase physical activity.

Methods

The SQUASH was modified to include items on sitting time and light-intensity physical activity (LPA-SQUASH). A pilot study was conducted with 20 liver transplant patients, and an expert panel validated the scale contents. Then, post-liver-transplant outpatients at a Japanese university hospital participated in the main study (September–October 2020), in which questionnaires were mailed twice to assess test–retest reliability, and accelerometers used to establish criterion validity. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for test–retest reliability. Spearman correlations and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess validity and measurement error.

Results

In total, 173 participants returned the questionnaires, and 106 and 71 completed the reliability and validation studies, respectively. The range of LPA-SQUASH correlation coefficients for test–retest was .49–.58. ICCs ranged from .72 to .80 for items other than leisure. Accelerometer data and the LPA-SQUASH total physical activity amount and light-intensity physical activity correlated moderately.

Conclusion

We modified the SQUASH, which was developed to measure physical activity in healthy adults, to assess light-intensity physical activity in post-liver-transplant patients. The LPA-SQUASH showed acceptable validity and reliability. The questionnaire may be used by transplantation nurses to examine light-intensity physical activity content/duration, deliver patient education considering patients' sedentary lifestyle, and facilitate goal setting for physical activity interventions to prevent metabolic syndrome.

LPA-SQUASH在肝移植后患者中的验证。
目的:本研究旨在验证经修订的评估健康增强体力活动的简短问卷(SQUASH),以测量肝移植后患者的久坐活动。所提出的量表可能有助于移植护士评估和改变久坐不动的生活方式并增加体力活动。方法:将SQUASH修改为包括久坐时间和光强度体力活动(LPA-SQUASH)项目。对20名肝移植患者进行了一项试点研究,一个专家小组验证了量表的内容。然后,日本一所大学医院的肝移植后门诊患者参与了主要研究(2020年9月至10月),其中两次邮寄问卷以评估重新测试的可靠性,并使用加速度计来确定标准的有效性。计算类内相关系数(ICC)以评估重测的可靠性。Spearman相关性和Bland-Altman图用于评估有效性和测量误差。结果:总共有173名参与者返回了问卷,106人和71人分别完成了可靠性和验证研究。重测的LPA-SQUASH相关系数范围为.49-.58。休闲以外的物品的ICCs从.72到.80不等。加速度计数据与LPA-SQUASH总体力活动量和光强度体力活动适度相关。结论:我们改进了用于测量健康成年人体力活动的SQUASH,以评估肝移植后患者的光强度体力活动。LPA-SQUASH显示出可接受的有效性和可靠性。移植护士可以使用该问卷来检查轻强度体力活动的内容/持续时间,提供考虑患者久坐生活方式的患者教育,并促进制定预防代谢综合征的体力活动干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信