Use of Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems in Tissue Expander and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Nathan Makarewicz, Kelsey Lipman, Thomas Johnstone, Mohammed Shaheen, Jennifer Krupa Shah, Rahim Nazerali
{"title":"Use of Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems in Tissue Expander and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Nathan Makarewicz,&nbsp;Kelsey Lipman,&nbsp;Thomas Johnstone,&nbsp;Mohammed Shaheen,&nbsp;Jennifer Krupa Shah,&nbsp;Rahim Nazerali","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic infections are a debilitating complication of alloplastic breast reconstruction. Local antibiotic delivery for prophylaxis and infection clearance has been used by other surgical specialties but rarely in breast reconstruction. Because local delivery can maintain high antibiotic concentrations with lower toxicity risk, it may be valuable for infection prophylaxis or salvage in breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases was performed in January 2022. Primary literature studies examining local antibiotic delivery systems for either prophylaxis or salvage of periprosthetic infections were included. Study quality and bias were assessed using the validated MINORS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 355 publications reviewed, 8 met the predetermined inclusion criteria; 5 papers investigated local antibiotic delivery for salvage, and 3 investigated infection prophylaxis. Implantable antibiotic delivery devices included polymethylmethacrylate, calcium sulfate, and collagen sponges impregnated with antibiotics. Non-implantable antibiotic delivery methods used irrigation with antibiotic solution into the breast pocket. All studies indicated that local antibiotic delivery was either comparable or superior to conventional methods in both the salvage and prophylaxis settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite varied sample sizes and methodologies, all papers endorsed local antibiotic delivery as a safe, effective method of preventing or treating periprosthetic infections in breast reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"23 ","pages":"e24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176462/pdf/eplasty-23-e24.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic infections are a debilitating complication of alloplastic breast reconstruction. Local antibiotic delivery for prophylaxis and infection clearance has been used by other surgical specialties but rarely in breast reconstruction. Because local delivery can maintain high antibiotic concentrations with lower toxicity risk, it may be valuable for infection prophylaxis or salvage in breast reconstruction.

Methods: A systematic search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases was performed in January 2022. Primary literature studies examining local antibiotic delivery systems for either prophylaxis or salvage of periprosthetic infections were included. Study quality and bias were assessed using the validated MINORS criteria.

Results: Of 355 publications reviewed, 8 met the predetermined inclusion criteria; 5 papers investigated local antibiotic delivery for salvage, and 3 investigated infection prophylaxis. Implantable antibiotic delivery devices included polymethylmethacrylate, calcium sulfate, and collagen sponges impregnated with antibiotics. Non-implantable antibiotic delivery methods used irrigation with antibiotic solution into the breast pocket. All studies indicated that local antibiotic delivery was either comparable or superior to conventional methods in both the salvage and prophylaxis settings.

Conclusions: Despite varied sample sizes and methodologies, all papers endorsed local antibiotic delivery as a safe, effective method of preventing or treating periprosthetic infections in breast reconstruction.

局部抗生素输送系统在组织扩张器和假体乳房重建中的应用:文献系统综述。
背景:假体周围感染是同种异体乳房重建的一个衰弱并发症。局部抗生素递送预防和感染清除已用于其他外科专科,但很少用于乳房重建。由于局部分娩可保持较高的抗生素浓度,毒性风险较低,可能对预防感染或乳房再造的抢救有价值。方法:于2022年1月对Embase、PubMed和Cochrane数据库进行系统检索。主要文献研究检查局部抗生素输送系统预防或挽救假体周围感染。使用经过验证的未成年人标准评估研究质量和偏倚。结果:在355篇文献中,有8篇符合预定的纳入标准;5篇研究了抢救性局部抗生素的使用,3篇研究了感染预防。植入式抗生素输送装置包括聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯、硫酸钙和胶原蛋白海绵浸渍抗生素。非植入式抗生素给药方法采用抗生素溶液冲洗乳房袋。所有的研究都表明,在抢救和预防方面,局部抗生素的使用与传统方法相当或优于传统方法。结论:尽管样本量和方法各不相同,但所有的论文都赞同局部抗生素给药是一种安全有效的预防或治疗乳房重建假体周围感染的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信