Associations Between Gluteus Medius Trigger Points With Hip Passive Range of Movement and Muscle Strength in Adults With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marianne Carroll MHSc , Richard Ellis PhD , Susan Kohut MHSc , Nick Garrett PhD , César Fernández-de-las-Peñas PhD
{"title":"Associations Between Gluteus Medius Trigger Points With Hip Passive Range of Movement and Muscle Strength in Adults With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Marianne Carroll MHSc ,&nbsp;Richard Ellis PhD ,&nbsp;Susan Kohut MHSc ,&nbsp;Nick Garrett PhD ,&nbsp;César Fernández-de-las-Peñas PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between gluteus medius trigger points with hip passive range of motion and hip muscle strength in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>This was a cross-sectional, blinded study that took place in 2 rural communities in New Zealand. Assessments were carried out in physiotherapy clinics in these towns. A total of 42 participants over 18 years old experiencing chronic nonspecific LBP were recruited. After meeting inclusion criteria, participants completed the following 3 questionnaires: Numerical Pain Rating Scale, </span>Oswestry Disability Index, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. The primary researcher (a physiotherapist) assessed each participant's bilateral hip passive range of movement (using an inclinometer) and muscle strength (using a dynamometer). Following this, a blinded trigger point assessor examined the </span>gluteus medius muscles for the presence of active and latent trigger points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>General linear modeling using univariate analysis revealed that there was a positive association between hip strength and trigger point status (P =.03 left internal rotation, P =.04 right internal rotation, and P =.02 right abduction). Participants with no trigger points showed higher strength values (eg, right internal rotation standard error: 0.64), and those with trigger points showed lower strength. Overall, muscles exhibiting latent trigger points were the weakest (eg, right internal rotation standard error: 0.67).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of active or latent gluteus medius trigger points was associated with hip weakness in adults with chronic nonspecific LBP. There was no association between gluteus medius trigger points and hip passive range of movement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between gluteus medius trigger points with hip passive range of motion and hip muscle strength in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP).

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, blinded study that took place in 2 rural communities in New Zealand. Assessments were carried out in physiotherapy clinics in these towns. A total of 42 participants over 18 years old experiencing chronic nonspecific LBP were recruited. After meeting inclusion criteria, participants completed the following 3 questionnaires: Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. The primary researcher (a physiotherapist) assessed each participant's bilateral hip passive range of movement (using an inclinometer) and muscle strength (using a dynamometer). Following this, a blinded trigger point assessor examined the gluteus medius muscles for the presence of active and latent trigger points.

Results

General linear modeling using univariate analysis revealed that there was a positive association between hip strength and trigger point status (P =.03 left internal rotation, P =.04 right internal rotation, and P =.02 right abduction). Participants with no trigger points showed higher strength values (eg, right internal rotation standard error: 0.64), and those with trigger points showed lower strength. Overall, muscles exhibiting latent trigger points were the weakest (eg, right internal rotation standard error: 0.67).

Conclusion

The presence of active or latent gluteus medius trigger points was associated with hip weakness in adults with chronic nonspecific LBP. There was no association between gluteus medius trigger points and hip passive range of movement.

成年慢性非特异性腰痛患者臀中肌触发点与髋关节被动活动范围和肌力之间的关系:一项横断面研究
目的探讨慢性非特异性腰痛(LBP)患者臀中肌触发点与髋关节被动活动度和髋关节肌力之间是否存在关系。方法:这是一项横断面、盲法研究,在新西兰的两个农村社区进行。在这些城镇的理疗诊所进行了评估。共招募了42名18岁以上的慢性非特异性LBP患者。在满足纳入标准后,参与者完成以下3份问卷:数值疼痛评定量表、Oswestry残疾指数和坦帕运动恐惧症量表。主要研究人员(一名物理治疗师)评估每位参与者的双侧髋关节被动活动范围(使用倾斜仪)和肌肉力量(使用测力仪)。在此之后,一个盲法触发点评估者检查臀中肌是否存在活跃和潜在的触发点。结果使用单变量分析的一般线性模型显示髋关节力量和触发点状态之间存在正相关(P =。03左内旋,P =。04右内旋,P =。02右外展)。没有触发点的参与者表现出更高的强度值(例如,右内旋标准误差:0.64),而有触发点的参与者表现出更低的强度。总的来说,表现出潜在触发点的肌肉是最弱的(例如,右内旋标准误差:0.67)。结论成年慢性非特异性腰痛患者存在活跃或潜伏的臀中肌触发点与髋关节无力有关。臀中肌触发点与髋关节被动活动范围无关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信