Incidence of Rib Fracture following Treatment with Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Julie A Bradley, Xiaoying Liang, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Chunbo Liu, Eric D Brooks, Teena Burchianti, Emma Viviers, Roi Dagan, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru, Christopher G Morris, Nancy P Mendenhall
{"title":"Incidence of Rib Fracture following Treatment with Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer.","authors":"Julie A Bradley,&nbsp;Xiaoying Liang,&nbsp;Raymond B Mailhot Vega,&nbsp;Chunbo Liu,&nbsp;Eric D Brooks,&nbsp;Teena Burchianti,&nbsp;Emma Viviers,&nbsp;Roi Dagan,&nbsp;Oluwadamilola T Oladeru,&nbsp;Christopher G Morris,&nbsp;Nancy P Mendenhall","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-22-00034.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the rib fracture rate in a cohort of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>From a prospective database, we identified 225 patients treated with proton therapy between 2012 and 2020 (223 women; 2 men). Clinical and dosimetric data were extracted, the cumulative incidence method assessed rib fracture rate, and Fine-Gray tests assessed prognostic significance of select variables. In-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture that occurred in a rib located within the 10% isodose line. Out-of-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture occurring in a rib location outside of the 10% isodose line.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients, 74% had left-sided breast cancer; 5%, bilateral; and 21%, right-sided. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans showed normality in 20%, osteopenia in 34%, and osteoporosis in 6% (test not performed in 40%). Additionally, 57% received an aromatase inhibitor. Target volumes were breast ± internal mammary nodes (IMNs) (16%), breast and comprehensive regional lymphatics (32%), chest wall ± IMNs (1%), and chest wall/comprehensive regional lymphatics (51%). Passive-scattered proton therapy was used for 41% of patients, 58% underwent pencil-beam scanning (PBS), and 1% underwent a combination (passive scattering/PBS), with 85% of patients receiving a boost. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, with 97% having >12-month follow-up. The 3-year cumulative in-field rib fracture incidence was 3.7%. Eight patients developed in-field rib fractures (1 symptomatic, 7 imaging identified) for a 0.4% symptomatic rib fracture rate. Median time from radiation completion to rib fracture identification was 1.8 years (fractures were identified within 2.2 years for 7 of 8 patients). No variables were associated with rib fracture on univariate analysis. Three fractures developed outside the radiation field (0.9% cumulative incidence of out-of-field rib fracture).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this series of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy, the 3-year rib fracture rates remain low (in-field 3.7%; symptomatic 0.4%). As in photon therapy, the asymptomatic rate may be underestimated owing to a lack of routine surveillance imaging. However, patients experiencing symptomatic rib fractures after proton therapy for breast cancer are rare.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"9 4","pages":"269-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166011/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00034.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the rib fracture rate in a cohort of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy.

Patient and methods: From a prospective database, we identified 225 patients treated with proton therapy between 2012 and 2020 (223 women; 2 men). Clinical and dosimetric data were extracted, the cumulative incidence method assessed rib fracture rate, and Fine-Gray tests assessed prognostic significance of select variables. In-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture that occurred in a rib located within the 10% isodose line. Out-of-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture occurring in a rib location outside of the 10% isodose line.

Results: Of the patients, 74% had left-sided breast cancer; 5%, bilateral; and 21%, right-sided. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans showed normality in 20%, osteopenia in 34%, and osteoporosis in 6% (test not performed in 40%). Additionally, 57% received an aromatase inhibitor. Target volumes were breast ± internal mammary nodes (IMNs) (16%), breast and comprehensive regional lymphatics (32%), chest wall ± IMNs (1%), and chest wall/comprehensive regional lymphatics (51%). Passive-scattered proton therapy was used for 41% of patients, 58% underwent pencil-beam scanning (PBS), and 1% underwent a combination (passive scattering/PBS), with 85% of patients receiving a boost. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, with 97% having >12-month follow-up. The 3-year cumulative in-field rib fracture incidence was 3.7%. Eight patients developed in-field rib fractures (1 symptomatic, 7 imaging identified) for a 0.4% symptomatic rib fracture rate. Median time from radiation completion to rib fracture identification was 1.8 years (fractures were identified within 2.2 years for 7 of 8 patients). No variables were associated with rib fracture on univariate analysis. Three fractures developed outside the radiation field (0.9% cumulative incidence of out-of-field rib fracture).

Conclusion: In this series of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy, the 3-year rib fracture rates remain low (in-field 3.7%; symptomatic 0.4%). As in photon therapy, the asymptomatic rate may be underestimated owing to a lack of routine surveillance imaging. However, patients experiencing symptomatic rib fractures after proton therapy for breast cancer are rare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

乳癌质子治疗后肋骨骨折的发生率。
目的:了解一组接受质子治疗的乳腺癌患者肋骨骨折的发生率。患者和方法:从前瞻性数据库中,我们确定了2012年至2020年间接受质子治疗的225例患者(223名女性;2人)。提取临床和剂量学数据,累积发生率法评估肋骨骨折率,Fine-Gray试验评估选定变量的预后意义。现场肋骨骨折被定义为发生在10%等剂量线内的肋骨骨折。外场肋骨骨折被定义为发生在10%等剂量线以外的肋骨位置的骨折。结果:74%的患者患有左侧乳腺癌;5%,两国;右边21%。双能x线吸收仪扫描显示20%正常,34%骨质减少,6%骨质疏松(40%未做检查)。此外,57%的患者接受了芳香酶抑制剂治疗。靶体积为乳腺±乳腺内淋巴结(IMNs)(16%)、乳腺及综合区域淋巴管(32%)、胸壁±IMNs(1%)和胸壁/综合区域淋巴管(51%)。41%的患者接受了被动散射质子治疗,58%的患者接受了铅笔束扫描(PBS), 1%的患者接受了联合治疗(被动散射/PBS), 85%的患者接受了增强治疗。中位随访时间为3.1年,97%随访时间大于12个月。3年累计现场肋骨骨折发生率为3.7%。8例患者发生现场肋骨骨折(1例有症状,7例影像学发现),症状性肋骨骨折率为0.4%。从放疗完成到发现肋骨骨折的中位时间为1.8年(8例患者中有7例在2.2年内发现骨折)。在单因素分析中,没有变量与肋骨骨折相关。3例骨折发生在辐射场外(累计发生率为0.9%)。结论:在这组接受质子治疗的乳腺癌患者中,3年肋骨骨折发生率仍然很低(现场3.7%;有症状的0.4%)。在光子治疗中,由于缺乏常规监测成像,无症状率可能被低估。然而,乳腺癌质子治疗后出现症状性肋骨骨折的患者是罕见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信