Effect of knack technique on vaginal laxity in multiparous women: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1002/pri.2036
Doaa A Abdel Hady, Abdel Rhman E Kassem, Hesham A Abdalla
{"title":"Effect of knack technique on vaginal laxity in multiparous women: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Doaa A Abdel Hady, Abdel Rhman E Kassem, Hesham A Abdalla","doi":"10.1002/pri.2036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaginal laxity defined according to the International Urogynecological Association/International Continence society is excessive vaginal looseness; it is one of the most common symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction, which refers to medical/functional disorders that can have a significant impact on a woman's sexual self-esteem and sexual life.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the impact of the Knack Technique on Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) and sexual function in women with vaginal laxity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty females complaining of vaginal laxity were randomly chosen from the outpatient clinic at Deraya University. Their ages varied from 35 to 45 years, their body mass index was 25-30 kg/m2, and a number of parities ≤ three normal vaginal deliveries and at least two years from the last delivery complaining about vaginal laxity, water entrapment, and loss of friction during sexual intercourse. They were randomized into two equal groups at random (A, B). Group A (15 females) received (PSTES) and group B (15 females) received (PSTES) and Knack Technique. Both the groups received three sessions per week for 2 months.</p><p><strong>Evaluation: </strong>The outcome measures were evaluated through pre- and post-interventions by using ultrasonography imaging to assess PFM function, Sexual Satisfaction Index, and Vaginal Laxity Questionnaires (VLQ) to assess sexual function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis indicated a significant improvement in vaginal laxity in the two groups. Comparison between groups pre- and posttreatment showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups B and A in SSI and VLQ, while there were significant differences between the groups A and B in PFM force.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining Parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation (PSTES) and Knack Technique is more effective than PSTES alone in reducing vaginal laxity as well as improving PFM and sexual function in women with vaginal laxity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":" ","pages":"e2036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaginal laxity defined according to the International Urogynecological Association/International Continence society is excessive vaginal looseness; it is one of the most common symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction, which refers to medical/functional disorders that can have a significant impact on a woman's sexual self-esteem and sexual life.

Aim: This study aimed to determine the impact of the Knack Technique on Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) and sexual function in women with vaginal laxity.

Methods: Thirty females complaining of vaginal laxity were randomly chosen from the outpatient clinic at Deraya University. Their ages varied from 35 to 45 years, their body mass index was 25-30 kg/m2, and a number of parities ≤ three normal vaginal deliveries and at least two years from the last delivery complaining about vaginal laxity, water entrapment, and loss of friction during sexual intercourse. They were randomized into two equal groups at random (A, B). Group A (15 females) received (PSTES) and group B (15 females) received (PSTES) and Knack Technique. Both the groups received three sessions per week for 2 months.

Evaluation: The outcome measures were evaluated through pre- and post-interventions by using ultrasonography imaging to assess PFM function, Sexual Satisfaction Index, and Vaginal Laxity Questionnaires (VLQ) to assess sexual function.

Results: Analysis indicated a significant improvement in vaginal laxity in the two groups. Comparison between groups pre- and posttreatment showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups B and A in SSI and VLQ, while there were significant differences between the groups A and B in PFM force.

Conclusion: Combining Parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation (PSTES) and Knack Technique is more effective than PSTES alone in reducing vaginal laxity as well as improving PFM and sexual function in women with vaginal laxity.

Knack技术对多产妇女阴道松弛的影响:随机对照试验
背景:根据国际泌尿妇科协会/国际尿失禁协会的定义,阴道松弛是指阴道过度松弛;它是盆底功能障碍最常见的症状之一,盆底功能障碍是指会对女性的性自尊和性生活产生重大影响的医疗/功能障碍:从德拉雅大学门诊部随机挑选了 30 名主诉阴道松弛的女性。她们的年龄从 35 岁到 45 岁不等,体重指数为 25-30 kg/m2,分娩次数≤三次正常阴道分娩,且距上次分娩至少两年,主诉为阴道松弛、阴道积水和性交时失去摩擦力。她们被随机分为两组(A、B)。A 组(15 名女性)接受(PSTES),B 组(15 名女性)接受(PSTES)和 Knack 技术。两组均每周接受三次治疗,为期 2 个月:通过干预前后的超声波成像评估 PFM 功能、性满意度指数和阴道松弛问卷(VLQ)评估性功能,对结果进行评估:分析表明,两组患者的阴道松弛程度均有明显改善。治疗前后的组间比较显示,B 组和 A 组在 SSI 和 VLQ 方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异,而 A 组和 B 组在 PFM 力方面有显著差异:结论:骶骨旁经皮电刺激(PSTES)与 Knack 技术相结合,比单独使用 PSTES 更能有效减轻阴道松弛,改善阴道松弛妇女的 PFM 和性功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信