Kofi Effah, Mawusi C Wormenor, Ethel Tekpor, Joseph E Amuah, Hayford B Atuguba, Essel N O Mensah, Ewoenam S Badzi, Stephen Danyo, Dominic Agyiri, Gifty B Klutsey, Patrick K Akakpo
{"title":"Mobile colposcopy by trained nurses in a cervical cancer screening programme at Battor, Ghana.","authors":"Kofi Effah, Mawusi C Wormenor, Ethel Tekpor, Joseph E Amuah, Hayford B Atuguba, Essel N O Mensah, Ewoenam S Badzi, Stephen Danyo, Dominic Agyiri, Gifty B Klutsey, Patrick K Akakpo","doi":"10.4314/gmj.v56i3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cervical precancer screening programs are difficult to establish in low resource settings partly because of a lack of human resource. Our aiming was to overcome this challenge. We hypothesized that this could be done through task shifting to trained nurses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive retrospective cross-sectional review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Training was at the Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Center (CCPTC) and screening was carried out at the clinic and at outreaches / peripheral facilities.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All women who reported to the clinic for screening or were recruited during outreaches.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All 4 nurses were trained for at least 2weeks (module 1). A total of 904 women were screened by the trained nurses using the EVA system. Quality assurance was ensured.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary screening and follow-up were carried out by the trained nurses with quality assured through image sharing and meetings with peers and experienced gynaecologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>828 women had primary screening and 76 had follow-up screening. 739 (89.3%) were screened at the clinic and 89 (10.7%) at outreaches/peripheral facilities. Of all screened, 130 (14.5%) had cervical lesions, and 25 (2.8%) were treated, 12 (48.0%) by Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) performed by a gynaecologist, 11 (44.0%) with thermal coagulation by trained nurses except one, and 2 (8.0%) with cryotherapy by trained nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate the utility of a model where nurses trained in basic colposcopy can be used to successfully implement a cervical precancer screening and treatment program in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":35509,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336638/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v56i3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objectives: Cervical precancer screening programs are difficult to establish in low resource settings partly because of a lack of human resource. Our aiming was to overcome this challenge. We hypothesized that this could be done through task shifting to trained nurses.
Setting: Training was at the Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Center (CCPTC) and screening was carried out at the clinic and at outreaches / peripheral facilities.
Participants: All women who reported to the clinic for screening or were recruited during outreaches.
Interventions: All 4 nurses were trained for at least 2weeks (module 1). A total of 904 women were screened by the trained nurses using the EVA system. Quality assurance was ensured.
Main outcome measures: Primary screening and follow-up were carried out by the trained nurses with quality assured through image sharing and meetings with peers and experienced gynaecologists.
Results: 828 women had primary screening and 76 had follow-up screening. 739 (89.3%) were screened at the clinic and 89 (10.7%) at outreaches/peripheral facilities. Of all screened, 130 (14.5%) had cervical lesions, and 25 (2.8%) were treated, 12 (48.0%) by Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) performed by a gynaecologist, 11 (44.0%) with thermal coagulation by trained nurses except one, and 2 (8.0%) with cryotherapy by trained nurses.
Conclusion: We demonstrate the utility of a model where nurses trained in basic colposcopy can be used to successfully implement a cervical precancer screening and treatment program in low-resource settings.