Analysis of application of digital image analysis in histopathology quality control

Q2 Medicine
Riya Singh, Shakti Kumar Yadav, Neelkamal Kapoor
{"title":"Analysis of application of digital image analysis in histopathology quality control","authors":"Riya Singh,&nbsp;Shakti Kumar Yadav,&nbsp;Neelkamal Kapoor","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A correct histopathological diagnosis is dependent on an array of technical variables. The quality and completeness of a histological section on a slide is extremely prudent for correct interpretation. However, this is mostly done manually and depends largely on the expertise of histotechnician. In this study, we analysed the application of digital image analysis for quality control of histological section as a proof-of-concept.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Images of 1000 histological sections and their corresponding blocks were captured. Area of the section was measured from these digital images of tissue block (Digiblock) and slide (Digislide). The data was analysed to calculate DigislideQC score, dividing the area of tissue on the slide by the tissue area on the block and it was compared with the number of recuts done for incomplete section.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Digislide QC score ranged from 0.1 to 0.99. It showed an area under curve (AUC) of 98.8%. A cut-off value of 0.65 had a sensitivity of 99.6% and a specificity of 96.7%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Digiblock and Digislide images can provide information about quality of sections. DigislideQC score can correctly identify the slides which require recuts before it is sent for reporting and potentially reduce histopathologists’ slide screening effort and ultimately turnaround time. These can be incorporated in routine histopathology workflows and lab information systems. This simple technology can also improve future digital pathology and telepathology workflows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/d5/main.PMC10339183.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923001360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A correct histopathological diagnosis is dependent on an array of technical variables. The quality and completeness of a histological section on a slide is extremely prudent for correct interpretation. However, this is mostly done manually and depends largely on the expertise of histotechnician. In this study, we analysed the application of digital image analysis for quality control of histological section as a proof-of-concept.

Material and methods

Images of 1000 histological sections and their corresponding blocks were captured. Area of the section was measured from these digital images of tissue block (Digiblock) and slide (Digislide). The data was analysed to calculate DigislideQC score, dividing the area of tissue on the slide by the tissue area on the block and it was compared with the number of recuts done for incomplete section.

Results

Digislide QC score ranged from 0.1 to 0.99. It showed an area under curve (AUC) of 98.8%. A cut-off value of 0.65 had a sensitivity of 99.6% and a specificity of 96.7%.

Conclusion

Digiblock and Digislide images can provide information about quality of sections. DigislideQC score can correctly identify the slides which require recuts before it is sent for reporting and potentially reduce histopathologists’ slide screening effort and ultimately turnaround time. These can be incorporated in routine histopathology workflows and lab information systems. This simple technology can also improve future digital pathology and telepathology workflows.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

数字图像分析在组织病理学质量控制中的应用分析
引言正确的组织病理学诊断取决于一系列技术变量。幻灯片上组织学切片的质量和完整性对于正确解释是非常谨慎的。然而,这主要是手动完成的,并且在很大程度上取决于组织技术人员的专业知识。在这项研究中,我们分析了数字图像分析在组织学切片质量控制中的应用,作为一种概念验证。材料和方法捕获了1000个组织学切片及其相应块的图像。根据这些组织块(Digiblock)和载玻片(Digislide)的数字图像测量切片的面积。对数据进行分析以计算DigislideQC评分,将载玻片上的组织面积除以块上的组织区域,并将其与不完整切片的切片次数进行比较。结果Digislide QC评分范围为0.1~0.99。曲线下面积(AUC)为98.8%,截断值0.65,灵敏度为99.6%,特异性为96.7%。DigislideQC评分可以正确识别在发送报告之前需要重新切片的载玻片,并可能减少组织病理学家的载玻片筛查工作和最终周转时间。这些可以纳入常规组织病理学工作流程和实验室信息系统。这项简单的技术还可以改善未来的数字病理学和远程病理学工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信