Interdisciplinary patient-centred poststroke care in Follow-up After Stroke, Screening and Treatment (FASST) clinic model: a proof-of-concept pilot study.

Min Sun Kim, Sean V Cleymaet, Seung Kim, Jennifer Andres, Charles Ruchalski, Yongwoo Kim, S Ausim Azizi, Anjail Z Sharrief, Imama A Naqvi
{"title":"Interdisciplinary patient-centred poststroke care in Follow-up After Stroke, Screening and Treatment (FASST) clinic model: a proof-of-concept pilot study.","authors":"Min Sun Kim,&nbsp;Sean V Cleymaet,&nbsp;Seung Kim,&nbsp;Jennifer Andres,&nbsp;Charles Ruchalski,&nbsp;Yongwoo Kim,&nbsp;S Ausim Azizi,&nbsp;Anjail Z Sharrief,&nbsp;Imama A Naqvi","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2021-000118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although secondary stroke prevention is important, the optimal outpatient model that improves risk factor control and decreases post-stroke complications effectively has not been established. We created Follow-up After Stroke, Screening and Treatment (FASST), an interdisciplinary clinic involving stroke physicians and pharmacists to address poststroke complications and secondary stroke prevention systemically. We present our approach to assess its proof-of-concept in our pilot study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included the patients attending FASST clinic after their hospital discharge. We used validated survey screens to assess for complications: depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, disability, social support, quality of life and functional status. Data were collected including risk factors, complication screening results and outcome scores. Clinical pharmacists assessed risk factor control and health-related behaviours for modification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 25 patients enrolled in the interdisciplinary clinic, all had comorbid hyperlipidaemia and hypertension, and 44% had diabetes mellitus. About one-third needed medication changes for risk factor control. On screening, 16% of patients were found to have depression, 12% had anxiety and 20% had sleep apnoea. These patients were either managed in the clinic or were referred to relevant subspeciality clinics. The status of risk factor control was assessed in all patients, and 32% had medications adjustments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data found that FASST clinic model is feasible and potentially useful. It represents an integrated approach to post-stroke care, with pharmacist collaboration to improve risk factor control, while assessing for poststroke complications. Further study is needed to improve health outcomes through integrated poststroke care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/2a/ihj-2021-000118.PMC10327447.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Although secondary stroke prevention is important, the optimal outpatient model that improves risk factor control and decreases post-stroke complications effectively has not been established. We created Follow-up After Stroke, Screening and Treatment (FASST), an interdisciplinary clinic involving stroke physicians and pharmacists to address poststroke complications and secondary stroke prevention systemically. We present our approach to assess its proof-of-concept in our pilot study.

Methods: We included the patients attending FASST clinic after their hospital discharge. We used validated survey screens to assess for complications: depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, disability, social support, quality of life and functional status. Data were collected including risk factors, complication screening results and outcome scores. Clinical pharmacists assessed risk factor control and health-related behaviours for modification.

Results: Of the 25 patients enrolled in the interdisciplinary clinic, all had comorbid hyperlipidaemia and hypertension, and 44% had diabetes mellitus. About one-third needed medication changes for risk factor control. On screening, 16% of patients were found to have depression, 12% had anxiety and 20% had sleep apnoea. These patients were either managed in the clinic or were referred to relevant subspeciality clinics. The status of risk factor control was assessed in all patients, and 32% had medications adjustments.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data found that FASST clinic model is feasible and potentially useful. It represents an integrated approach to post-stroke care, with pharmacist collaboration to improve risk factor control, while assessing for poststroke complications. Further study is needed to improve health outcomes through integrated poststroke care.

Abstract Image

卒中后随访、筛查和治疗(FASST)临床模型中以患者为中心的跨学科卒中后护理:概念验证试点研究。
背景:虽然卒中二级预防很重要,但目前尚未建立起能够有效控制危险因素并减少卒中后并发症的最佳门诊模式。我们创建了卒中后随访、筛查和治疗(FASST),一个涉及卒中医生和药剂师的跨学科诊所,系统地解决卒中后并发症和二级卒中预防。我们提出了在试点研究中评估其概念验证的方法。方法:我们纳入了出院后在FASST诊所就诊的患者。我们使用经过验证的调查筛选来评估并发症:抑郁、焦虑、睡眠障碍、认知障碍、残疾、社会支持、生活质量和功能状态。收集的数据包括危险因素、并发症筛查结果和结局评分。临床药师评估风险因素控制和健康相关行为的改变。结果:纳入的25例患者均合并高脂血症和高血压,44%合并糖尿病。大约三分之一的人需要改变药物来控制风险因素。在筛查中,16%的患者被发现患有抑郁症,12%患有焦虑症,20%患有睡眠呼吸暂停症。这些患者要么在诊所管理,要么被转介到相关的亚专科诊所。评估了所有患者的危险因素控制状况,32%的患者进行了药物调整。结论:我们的初步数据表明FASST临床模型是可行的,具有潜在的应用价值。它代表了卒中后护理的综合方法,与药剂师合作,以改善风险因素控制,同时评估卒中后并发症。需要进一步研究通过卒中后综合护理来改善健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信