Effect of needle orientation during arteriovenous access puncture on needed compression time after hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Valérie Loizeau, Hanan Tanouti, Audrie Marcheguet, Guillaume Loubière, Philippe Aegerter, Hocine Drioueche, Sandra Pembebjoglou
{"title":"Effect of needle orientation during arteriovenous access puncture on needed compression time after hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Valérie Loizeau,&nbsp;Hanan Tanouti,&nbsp;Audrie Marcheguet,&nbsp;Guillaume Loubière,&nbsp;Philippe Aegerter,&nbsp;Hocine Drioueche,&nbsp;Sandra Pembebjoglou","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There are two techniques for puncturing an arteriovenous fistula: one where the needle is inserted bevel up and then rotated to a bevel down position, and another where the needle is inserted bevel down. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods of needle insertion on minimum compression time required for hemostasis after needle removal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective, randomized, cross-over, blinded, single-center, routine care study. Each patient's average post-dialysis puncture site compression time was determined during a 2-week baseline period while using bevel-up access puncture. Subsequently, minimum post-dialysis puncture-site compression time was determined during each of two sequential follow-up periods, during which fistula puncture was done with needles inserted bevel up or down, respectively. The order of treatments (bevel up or bevel down insertion) was randomized. During each follow-up period, the minimum compression time necessary to avoid bleeding on needle removal was determined by progressively shortening the compression time. Puncture-associated pain was also assessed as prepump and venous pressures and ability to achieve desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-two patients were recruited. The baseline compression time after needle removal averaged 9.99 ± 2.7 min During the intervention periods, the minimum compression time was on average 10.8 min (9.23–12.4) when the access needles had been inserted bevel down versus 11.1 min (9.61–12.5) when the access needles had been inserted bevel up (<i>p</i> = 0.72). There was no difference in puncture-associated pain between the two insertion techniques, and no difference in prepump or venous pressures or ability to achieve the desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Bevel-up and bevel-down needle orientation during arteriovenous fistula puncture are equivalent techniques in terms of achieving hemostasis on needle removal, and puncture-associated pain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12815,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hdi.13105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hdi.13105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are two techniques for puncturing an arteriovenous fistula: one where the needle is inserted bevel up and then rotated to a bevel down position, and another where the needle is inserted bevel down. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods of needle insertion on minimum compression time required for hemostasis after needle removal.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, cross-over, blinded, single-center, routine care study. Each patient's average post-dialysis puncture site compression time was determined during a 2-week baseline period while using bevel-up access puncture. Subsequently, minimum post-dialysis puncture-site compression time was determined during each of two sequential follow-up periods, during which fistula puncture was done with needles inserted bevel up or down, respectively. The order of treatments (bevel up or bevel down insertion) was randomized. During each follow-up period, the minimum compression time necessary to avoid bleeding on needle removal was determined by progressively shortening the compression time. Puncture-associated pain was also assessed as prepump and venous pressures and ability to achieve desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session.

Results

Forty-two patients were recruited. The baseline compression time after needle removal averaged 9.99 ± 2.7 min During the intervention periods, the minimum compression time was on average 10.8 min (9.23–12.4) when the access needles had been inserted bevel down versus 11.1 min (9.61–12.5) when the access needles had been inserted bevel up (p = 0.72). There was no difference in puncture-associated pain between the two insertion techniques, and no difference in prepump or venous pressures or ability to achieve the desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session.

Conclusion

Bevel-up and bevel-down needle orientation during arteriovenous fistula puncture are equivalent techniques in terms of achieving hemostasis on needle removal, and puncture-associated pain.

Abstract Image

动静脉穿刺过程中针头方向对血液透析后所需压迫时间的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:有两种穿刺动静脉瘘的技术:一种是将针头斜向上插入,然后旋转到斜向下的位置,另一种是针头斜向下插入。本研究的目的是比较这两种针头插入方法在拔针后止血所需的最短压缩时间。方法:这是一项前瞻性、随机、交叉、盲法、单中心、常规护理研究。每个患者的平均透析后穿刺部位压缩时间是在2周的基线期内确定的,同时使用倾斜通道穿刺。随后,在两个连续随访期中的每一个随访期内,确定透析后穿刺部位的最短压缩时间,在此期间,分别用倾斜向上或向下插入的针头进行瘘管穿刺。治疗顺序(斜面向上或斜面向下插入)是随机的。在每次随访期间,通过逐渐缩短压迫时间来确定避免拔针出血所需的最短压迫时间。穿刺相关疼痛也被评估为泵前和静脉压力以及在透析过程中实现所需血液流速的能力。结果:共招募42名患者。拔针后的基线压缩时间平均为9.99 ± 2.7 min在干预期间,最小压缩时间平均为10.8 最小值(9.23-12.4),当接入针插入时倾斜向下,而11.1 min(9.61-12.5)(p = 0.72)。两种插入技术在穿刺相关疼痛方面没有差异,在泵前或静脉压力或在透析过程中实现所需血液流速的能力方面也没有差异。结论:在动静脉瘘穿刺过程中,上斜和下斜针定向是实现拔针止血和穿刺相关疼痛的等效技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hemodialysis International
Hemodialysis International UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hemodialysis International was originally an annual publication containing the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Hemodialysis held in conjunction with the Annual Dialysis Conference. Since 2003, Hemodialysis International is published quarterly and contains original papers on clinical and experimental topics related to dialysis in addition to the Annual Dialysis Conference supplement. This journal is a must-have for nephrologists, nurses, and technicians worldwide. Quarterly issues of Hemodialysis International are included with your membership to the International Society for Hemodialysis. The journal contains original articles, review articles, and commentary to keep readers completely updated in the field of hemodialysis. Edited by international and multidisciplinary experts, Hemodialysis International disseminates critical information in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信