Value Sinks: A Process Theory of Corruption Risk during Complex Organizing.

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
James K Hazy, Benyamin B Lichtenstein, Dionysios S Demetis, Tomas Backstrom, Kevin J Dooley
{"title":"Value Sinks: A Process Theory of Corruption Risk during Complex Organizing.","authors":"James K Hazy,&nbsp;Benyamin B Lichtenstein,&nbsp;Dionysios S Demetis,&nbsp;Tomas Backstrom,&nbsp;Kevin J Dooley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theories and studies of corruption typically focus on individual ethics and agency problems in organizations. In this paper, we use concepts from complexity science to propose a process theory that describes how corruption risk emerges from conditions of uncertainty that are intrinsic in social systems and social interactions. We posit that our theory is valid across multiple levels of scale in social systems. We theorize that corruption involves dynamics that emerge when agents in a system take actions that exploit disequilibrium conditions of uncertainty and ethical ambiguity. Further, systemic corruption emerges when agent interactions are amplified locally in ways that create a hidden value sink which we define as a structure that extracts, or 'drains,' resources from the system for the exclusive use of certain agents. For those participating in corruption, the presence of a value sink reduces local uncertainties about access to resources. This dynamic can attract others to join the value sink, allowing it to persist and grow as a dynamical system attractor, eventually challenging broader norms. We close by identifying four distinct types of corruption risk and suggest policy interventions to manage them. Finally, we discuss ways in which our theoretical approach could motivate future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theories and studies of corruption typically focus on individual ethics and agency problems in organizations. In this paper, we use concepts from complexity science to propose a process theory that describes how corruption risk emerges from conditions of uncertainty that are intrinsic in social systems and social interactions. We posit that our theory is valid across multiple levels of scale in social systems. We theorize that corruption involves dynamics that emerge when agents in a system take actions that exploit disequilibrium conditions of uncertainty and ethical ambiguity. Further, systemic corruption emerges when agent interactions are amplified locally in ways that create a hidden value sink which we define as a structure that extracts, or 'drains,' resources from the system for the exclusive use of certain agents. For those participating in corruption, the presence of a value sink reduces local uncertainties about access to resources. This dynamic can attract others to join the value sink, allowing it to persist and grow as a dynamical system attractor, eventually challenging broader norms. We close by identifying four distinct types of corruption risk and suggest policy interventions to manage them. Finally, we discuss ways in which our theoretical approach could motivate future research.

价值汇:复杂组织中腐败风险的过程理论。
腐败的理论和研究通常集中在个人道德和组织中的代理问题上。在本文中,我们利用复杂性科学的概念提出了一个过程理论,该理论描述了腐败风险如何从社会系统和社会互动中固有的不确定性条件中产生。我们假设我们的理论在社会系统的多个尺度上都是有效的。我们的理论认为,当一个系统中的主体利用不确定性和道德模糊性的不平衡条件采取行动时,腐败涉及到动态。此外,当代理人的相互作用以创造隐藏的价值汇的方式在局部放大时,就会出现系统性腐败,我们将其定义为从系统中提取或“消耗”资源以供某些代理人独家使用的结构。对于那些参与腐败的人来说,价值汇的存在减少了当地获取资源的不确定性。这种动态可以吸引其他人加入价值汇,使其作为一个动态系统吸引物持续存在和发展,最终挑战更广泛的规范。最后,我们确定了四种不同类型的腐败风险,并提出了管理这些风险的政策干预措施。最后,我们讨论了我们的理论方法如何激励未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信