Humans can detect axillary odor cues of an acute respiratory infection in others.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Arnaud Tognetti, Megan N Williams, Nathalie Lybert, Mats Lekander, John Axelsson, Mats J Olsson
{"title":"Humans can detect axillary odor cues of an acute respiratory infection in others.","authors":"Arnaud Tognetti,&nbsp;Megan N Williams,&nbsp;Nathalie Lybert,&nbsp;Mats Lekander,&nbsp;John Axelsson,&nbsp;Mats J Olsson","doi":"10.1093/emph/eoad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Body odor conveys information about health status to conspecifics and influences approach-avoidance behaviors in animals. Experiments that induce sickness in otherwise healthy individuals suggest that humans too can detect sensory cues to infection in others. Here, we investigated whether individuals could detect through smell a naturally occurring acute respiratory infection in others and whether sickness severity, measured via body temperature and sickness symptoms, was associated with the accuracy of detection.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Body odor samples were collected from 20 donors, once while healthy and once while sick with an acute respiratory infection. Using a double-blind, two-alternative forced-choice method, 80 raters were instructed to identify the sick body odor from paired sick and healthy samples (i.e. 20 pairs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sickness detection was significantly above chance, although the magnitude of the effect was low (56.7%). Raters' sex and disgust sensitivity were not associated with the accuracy of sickness detection. However, we find some indication that greater change in donor body temperature, but not sickness symptoms, between sick and healthy conditions improved sickness detection accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications: </strong>Our findings suggest that humans can detect individuals with an acute respiratory infection through smell, albeit only slightly better than chance. Humans, similar to other animals, are likely able to use sickness odor cues to guide adaptive behaviors that decrease the risk of contagion, such as social avoidance. Further studies should determine how well humans can detect specific infections through body odor, such as Covid-19, and how multisensory cues to infection are used simultaneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":12156,"journal":{"name":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","volume":"11 1","pages":"219-228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324639/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoad016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and objectives: Body odor conveys information about health status to conspecifics and influences approach-avoidance behaviors in animals. Experiments that induce sickness in otherwise healthy individuals suggest that humans too can detect sensory cues to infection in others. Here, we investigated whether individuals could detect through smell a naturally occurring acute respiratory infection in others and whether sickness severity, measured via body temperature and sickness symptoms, was associated with the accuracy of detection.

Methodology: Body odor samples were collected from 20 donors, once while healthy and once while sick with an acute respiratory infection. Using a double-blind, two-alternative forced-choice method, 80 raters were instructed to identify the sick body odor from paired sick and healthy samples (i.e. 20 pairs).

Results: Sickness detection was significantly above chance, although the magnitude of the effect was low (56.7%). Raters' sex and disgust sensitivity were not associated with the accuracy of sickness detection. However, we find some indication that greater change in donor body temperature, but not sickness symptoms, between sick and healthy conditions improved sickness detection accuracy.

Conclusion and implications: Our findings suggest that humans can detect individuals with an acute respiratory infection through smell, albeit only slightly better than chance. Humans, similar to other animals, are likely able to use sickness odor cues to guide adaptive behaviors that decrease the risk of contagion, such as social avoidance. Further studies should determine how well humans can detect specific infections through body odor, such as Covid-19, and how multisensory cues to infection are used simultaneously.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人类可以探测到他人急性呼吸道感染的腋窝气味线索。
背景和目的:体臭向同种动物传递健康状况信息,并影响动物的避近行为。在其他健康个体中诱发疾病的实验表明,人类也能察觉到他人感染的感官线索。在这里,我们调查了个体是否可以通过嗅觉检测到他人自然发生的急性呼吸道感染,以及通过体温和疾病症状测量的疾病严重程度是否与检测的准确性相关。方法:收集20名捐献者的体臭样本,其中一次是健康的,另一次是患有急性呼吸道感染的。采用双盲、两种选择的强迫选择方法,80名评分者被指示从成对的生病和健康样本(即20对)中识别生病的体味。结果:疾病检出率显著高于概率,但影响幅度较低(56.7%)。评分者的性别和厌恶敏感度与疾病检测的准确性无关。然而,我们发现一些迹象表明,在生病和健康状况之间,供体体温的较大变化,而不是疾病症状的较大变化,提高了疾病检测的准确性。结论和意义:我们的研究结果表明,人类可以通过气味检测出患有急性呼吸道感染的个体,尽管只比偶然好一点点。与其他动物类似,人类可能能够利用疾病气味线索来指导适应性行为,从而降低感染风险,例如社交回避。进一步的研究应确定人类通过体味(如Covid-19)检测特定感染的能力,以及如何同时使用多感官感染线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Founded by Stephen Stearns in 2013, Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health is an open access journal that publishes original, rigorous applications of evolutionary science to issues in medicine and public health. It aims to connect evolutionary biology with the health sciences to produce insights that may reduce suffering and save lives. Because evolutionary biology is a basic science that reaches across many disciplines, this journal is open to contributions on a broad range of topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信