Grade Group accuracy is improved by extensive prostate biopsy sampling, but unrelated to prostatectomy specimen sampling or use of immunohistochemistry.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kristóf Levente Korpás, Lívia Beke, Dániel Varga, László Bidiga, Gábor Méhes, Sarolta Molnár
{"title":"Grade Group accuracy is improved by extensive prostate biopsy sampling, but unrelated to prostatectomy specimen sampling or use of immunohistochemistry.","authors":"Kristóf Levente Korpás,&nbsp;Lívia Beke,&nbsp;Dániel Varga,&nbsp;László Bidiga,&nbsp;Gábor Méhes,&nbsp;Sarolta Molnár","doi":"10.3389/pore.2023.1611157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing the accurate Grade Group of a prostate needle biopsy specimen is essential for choosing the adequate therapeutic modality for prostate cancer patients. However, it is well-known that biopsy Grade Group tends to up- or downgrade significantly at radical prostatectomy. We aimed to investigate the correlation between accuracy and biopsy core number, performed immunohistochemical staining (IHC) or prostatectomy specimen sampling, with the latest also being correlated with higher detection rates of adverse pathological features, e.g., positive surgical margins, higher pathological stage or presence of perineural invasion (PnI status). The study cohort consisted of 315 consecutive patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma via transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy who later underwent radical prostatectomy. We grouped and compared patients based on Grade Group accuracy, presence of IHC on biopsy, margin status, pathological stage, and PnI status. Inter-observer reproducibility was also calculated. Statistical analyzes included ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparisons <i>post hoc</i> test, Chi-squared test, and Fleiss kappa statistics. Undergraded cases harboured a significantly lower number of biopsy cores (<i>p</i> < 0.05), than accurately graded cases. Using IHC did not affect grading accuracy significantly, nor did the number of slides from prostatectomy specimens. The mean number of slides was virtually identical when margin status, pathological stage and PnI status of prostatectomy specimens were compared. Inter-observer reproducibility at our institute was calculated as fair (overall kappa = 0.29). Grade Group accuracy is significantly improved by obtaining more cores at biopsy but is unrelated to performed IHC. The extent of sampling prostatectomy specimens, however, did not affect accuracy and failed to significantly improve detection of adverse pathological features.</p>","PeriodicalId":19981,"journal":{"name":"Pathology & Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1611157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the accurate Grade Group of a prostate needle biopsy specimen is essential for choosing the adequate therapeutic modality for prostate cancer patients. However, it is well-known that biopsy Grade Group tends to up- or downgrade significantly at radical prostatectomy. We aimed to investigate the correlation between accuracy and biopsy core number, performed immunohistochemical staining (IHC) or prostatectomy specimen sampling, with the latest also being correlated with higher detection rates of adverse pathological features, e.g., positive surgical margins, higher pathological stage or presence of perineural invasion (PnI status). The study cohort consisted of 315 consecutive patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma via transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy who later underwent radical prostatectomy. We grouped and compared patients based on Grade Group accuracy, presence of IHC on biopsy, margin status, pathological stage, and PnI status. Inter-observer reproducibility was also calculated. Statistical analyzes included ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparisons post hoc test, Chi-squared test, and Fleiss kappa statistics. Undergraded cases harboured a significantly lower number of biopsy cores (p < 0.05), than accurately graded cases. Using IHC did not affect grading accuracy significantly, nor did the number of slides from prostatectomy specimens. The mean number of slides was virtually identical when margin status, pathological stage and PnI status of prostatectomy specimens were compared. Inter-observer reproducibility at our institute was calculated as fair (overall kappa = 0.29). Grade Group accuracy is significantly improved by obtaining more cores at biopsy but is unrelated to performed IHC. The extent of sampling prostatectomy specimens, however, did not affect accuracy and failed to significantly improve detection of adverse pathological features.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过广泛的前列腺活检取样可以提高分级组的准确性,但与前列腺切除术标本取样或免疫组织化学的使用无关。
评估前列腺穿刺活检标本的准确分级组对于前列腺癌患者选择适当的治疗方式至关重要。然而,众所周知,在根治性前列腺切除术中,活检分级组倾向于显著升高或降低。我们的目的是研究准确性与活检核数、进行免疫组化染色(IHC)或前列腺切除术标本取样之间的相关性,最新的方法也与不良病理特征的较高检出率相关,例如手术边缘阳性、较高的病理分期或存在神经周围浸润(PnI状态)。研究队列包括315名连续的经直肠超声引导下的前列腺穿刺活检诊断为前列腺癌的患者,这些患者后来接受了根治性前列腺切除术。我们根据分级组的准确性、活检中免疫组化的存在、边缘状态、病理分期和PnI状态对患者进行分组和比较。还计算了观察者间的再现性。统计分析包括方差分析、Tukey多重比较事后检验、卡方检验和Fleiss kappa统计。与分级准确的病例相比,分级不全的病例活检芯数明显减少(p < 0.05)。使用免疫组化对分级准确性没有显著影响,前列腺切除术标本的切片数量也没有显著影响。当比较前列腺切除术标本的边缘状态、病理分期和PnI状态时,切片的平均数量几乎相同。本研究所的观察者间再现性计算为公平(总体kappa = 0.29)。通过活检获得更多的核,分级组的准确性显著提高,但与进行的免疫组化无关。然而,前列腺切除术标本取样的范围并不影响准确性,也未能显著提高对不良病理特征的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pathology & Oncology Research (POR) is an interdisciplinary Journal at the interface of pathology and oncology including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. Furthermore, POR is an international forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, POR is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments on the selected biomedical fields bridging the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. It is a special aim for POR to promote pathological and oncological publishing activity of colleagues in the Central and East European region. The journal will be of interest to pathologists, and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. POR is supported by an acknowledged international advisory board and the Arányi Fundation for modern pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信