The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in biliary tract cancer with KRAS mutation.

IF 4.2 3区 医学
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-05-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848231170484
Sun Young Jeong, Jung Yong Hong, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Jae Yeon Jang, Youngkyung Jeon, Seung Tae Kim
{"title":"The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in biliary tract cancer with KRAS mutation.","authors":"Sun Young Jeong, Jung Yong Hong, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Jae Yeon Jang, Youngkyung Jeon, Seung Tae Kim","doi":"10.1177/17562848231170484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With a 15% incidence, KRAS is one of the most common mutations in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and is a poor prognostic factor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as salvage therapy have modest activity in BTC.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are limited data on the efficacy of ICIs according to KRAS mutation in BTC. We evaluated the efficacy of ICIs in BTC patients with or without KRAS mutations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted molecular profiling in BTC patients who received ICIs as salvage therapy. The expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells was assessed using immunohistochemistry. The TruSight<sup>TM</sup> Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ICI in BTC patients according to KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 68.0 years; 47 patients (75.8%) received pembrolizumab and 15 (24.2%) received nivolumab as salvage therapy. All patients received gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the frontline therapy, and 53.2% received fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) before ICI. The median number of lines of prior chemotherapy was 2.5. The KRAS mutation was found in 13 patients (19.1%), and 28 patients (45.2%) showed 1% or more of tumor cells out of visible tumor cells positive for PD-L1. There was no statistical correlation between KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression. The median OS and PFS with ICI were 5.6 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3-8.0] and 3.8 (IQR: 3.0-4.5) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in PFS with ICIs according to KRAS mutation (mutant type <i>versus</i> wild type) and PD-L1 expression (positive <i>versus</i> negative). In subgroup analysis, patients with both KRAS mutation and PD-L1 positivity had longer PFS compared with patients with KRAS mutation and PD-L1 negativity (10.1 <i>versus</i> 2.6 months, <i>p</i> = 0.047). This finding was not shown in patients with wild-type KRAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression might be a useful biomarker for ICIs in BTC patients with KRAS mutation but not in those with wild-type KRAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848231170484"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/96/10.1177_17562848231170484.PMC10164250.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231170484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With a 15% incidence, KRAS is one of the most common mutations in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and is a poor prognostic factor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as salvage therapy have modest activity in BTC.

Objectives: There are limited data on the efficacy of ICIs according to KRAS mutation in BTC. We evaluated the efficacy of ICIs in BTC patients with or without KRAS mutations.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: We conducted molecular profiling in BTC patients who received ICIs as salvage therapy. The expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells was assessed using immunohistochemistry. The TruSightTM Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ICI in BTC patients according to KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression.

Results: A total of 62 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 68.0 years; 47 patients (75.8%) received pembrolizumab and 15 (24.2%) received nivolumab as salvage therapy. All patients received gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the frontline therapy, and 53.2% received fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) before ICI. The median number of lines of prior chemotherapy was 2.5. The KRAS mutation was found in 13 patients (19.1%), and 28 patients (45.2%) showed 1% or more of tumor cells out of visible tumor cells positive for PD-L1. There was no statistical correlation between KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression. The median OS and PFS with ICI were 5.6 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3-8.0] and 3.8 (IQR: 3.0-4.5) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in PFS with ICIs according to KRAS mutation (mutant type versus wild type) and PD-L1 expression (positive versus negative). In subgroup analysis, patients with both KRAS mutation and PD-L1 positivity had longer PFS compared with patients with KRAS mutation and PD-L1 negativity (10.1 versus 2.6 months, p = 0.047). This finding was not shown in patients with wild-type KRAS.

Conclusion: Our analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression might be a useful biomarker for ICIs in BTC patients with KRAS mutation but not in those with wild-type KRAS.

免疫检查点抑制剂对 KRAS 突变胆道癌的疗效。
背景:KRAS是胆道癌(BTC)中最常见的突变之一,发病率为15%,是一个不良预后因素。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)作为挽救疗法在胆道癌中的活性一般:根据 KRAS 突变对 BTC 进行免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的疗效数据有限。我们评估了 ICIs 在有或没有 KRAS 突变的 BTC 患者中的疗效:设计:回顾性观察研究:我们对接受 ICIs 作为挽救疗法的 BTC 患者进行了分子图谱分析。采用免疫组化方法评估肿瘤细胞上程序性死亡配体 1 (PD-L1) 的表达。我们使用了Illumina公司的TruSightTM Oncology 500测定作为癌症面板。我们根据KRAS突变和PD-L1的表达情况分析了ICI在BTC患者中的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS):本分析共纳入 62 例患者。中位年龄为 68.0 岁;47 名患者(75.8%)接受了 pembrolizumab 治疗,15 名患者(24.2%)接受了 nivolumab 作为挽救疗法。所有患者都接受了吉西他滨加顺铂的前线治疗,53.2%的患者在接受 ICI 治疗前接受了氟嘧啶加奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)治疗。之前化疗的中位数为2.5个疗程。13名患者(19.1%)发现了KRAS突变,28名患者(45.2%)的可见肿瘤细胞中有1%或更多的肿瘤细胞PD-L1阳性。KRAS突变与PD-L1表达之间没有统计学相关性。ICI的中位OS和PFS分别为5.6个月[四分位间距(IQR):3.3-8.0]和3.8个月(IQR:3.0-4.5)。根据KRAS突变(突变型与野生型)和PD-L1表达(阳性与阴性)的不同,使用ICIs的PFS差异无统计学意义。在亚组分析中,与KRAS突变和PD-L1阴性患者相比,KRAS突变和PD-L1均阳性患者的PFS更长(10.1个月对2.6个月,P = 0.047)。这一结果在野生型KRAS患者中未显示出来:我们的分析表明,在KRAS突变的BTC患者中,PD-L1表达可能是ICIs的有用生物标志物,但在野生型KRAS患者中并非如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信