{"title":"Invited Commentary: Achieving Post-Bypass Hemostasis in Young Children: At What Cost?","authors":"Susan Nicholson","doi":"10.1177/21501351231174826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young children requiring bypass often develop coagulopathy resulting in major postoperative blood loss. Increased post-bypass bleeding and donor exposures are independently associated with adverse outcomes. When transfusion of hemostatic blood products fails to reduce bleeding to an acceptable level, rescue therapies including prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and/or recombinant activated factor VII are being given \"off-label\" with increasing frequency. A number of studies attempting to determine the safety and efficacy of PCCs in neonates and young children are being published. These studies are most commonly retrospective, observational, performed in a single center with varying doses, indications for, and timing of administration in a small number of patients with varying results. The results of these individual studies are questionable and are not to be generalized to other center's patients. Because factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) contains the activated form of factor VII and factor X there are concerns regarding the potential for thrombotic events in a population with a known risk of postoperative thromboembolism. Currently, there is no validated assay with which to measure the efficacy of FEIBA in vivo to determine dose titration. Well-designed multicenter randomized control trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and risk-benefit of PCCs after pediatric cardiac surgery. Until such data are available the decision to give a procoagulant to neonates and young children after bypass needs to be made when the consequences of blood loss and replacement pose more risk than the risk of thrombotic complications from the drug.</p>","PeriodicalId":23974,"journal":{"name":"World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351231174826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Young children requiring bypass often develop coagulopathy resulting in major postoperative blood loss. Increased post-bypass bleeding and donor exposures are independently associated with adverse outcomes. When transfusion of hemostatic blood products fails to reduce bleeding to an acceptable level, rescue therapies including prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and/or recombinant activated factor VII are being given "off-label" with increasing frequency. A number of studies attempting to determine the safety and efficacy of PCCs in neonates and young children are being published. These studies are most commonly retrospective, observational, performed in a single center with varying doses, indications for, and timing of administration in a small number of patients with varying results. The results of these individual studies are questionable and are not to be generalized to other center's patients. Because factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) contains the activated form of factor VII and factor X there are concerns regarding the potential for thrombotic events in a population with a known risk of postoperative thromboembolism. Currently, there is no validated assay with which to measure the efficacy of FEIBA in vivo to determine dose titration. Well-designed multicenter randomized control trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and risk-benefit of PCCs after pediatric cardiac surgery. Until such data are available the decision to give a procoagulant to neonates and young children after bypass needs to be made when the consequences of blood loss and replacement pose more risk than the risk of thrombotic complications from the drug.
需要搭桥的幼儿往往会出现凝血障碍,导致术后大量失血。搭桥术后出血量和供体暴露量的增加与不良预后密切相关。当输注止血血制品无法将出血量降低到可接受的水平时,包括凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)和/或重组活化因子 VII 在内的抢救性疗法越来越多地在 "标签外 "使用。目前已发表了大量研究报告,试图确定凝血酶原复合物浓缩物对新生儿和幼儿的安全性和有效性。这些研究多为回顾性、观察性研究,在单一中心进行,对少数患者的用药剂量、适应症和用药时间各不相同,结果也不尽相同。这些个别研究的结果值得商榷,不能推广到其他中心的患者身上。由于因子 VIII 抑制剂旁路活性(FEIBA)含有活化形式的因子 VII 和因子 X,因此人们担心在已知有术后血栓栓塞风险的人群中发生血栓事件的可能性。目前,还没有有效的检测方法来测量 FEIBA 的体内疗效,以确定剂量滴定。需要进行精心设计的多中心随机对照试验,以确定小儿心脏手术后 PCCs 的最佳剂量和风险效益。在获得此类数据之前,需要在失血和换血的后果比药物引起血栓并发症的风险更大的情况下,决定是否在搭桥术后给新生儿和幼儿使用促凝血剂。