COVID-19 and Elective Spine Surgery: The Older Persons' Experience of Going It Alone.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000707
Andrea L Strayer, Barbara J King
{"title":"COVID-19 and Elective Spine Surgery: The Older Persons' Experience of Going It Alone.","authors":"Andrea L Strayer,&nbsp;Barbara J King","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Older people with debilitating degenerative spine disease may benefit from surgery. However, recovery is described as a circuitous process. In general, they describe feeling powerless and receiving depersonalized care during hospitalization. Institution of hospital no-visitor policies to reduce COVID-19 spread may have caused additional negative consequences. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to understand experiences of older people who underwent spine surgery during early COVID-19. METHODS: Grounded theory guided this study of people 65 years or older undergoing elective spine surgery. Fourteen individuals were recruited for 2 in-depth interviews at 2 time points: T1 during hospitalization and T2, 1 to 3 months post discharge. All participants were affected by pandemic-imposed restrictions with 4 interviews at T1 with no visitors, 10 with a 1-visitor policy, and 6 interviews at T2 rehabilitation setting with no visitors. Discriminate sampling of data in which participants described their experiences with COVID-19 visitor restrictions was used. Open and axial coding (consistent with grounded theory) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Three categories, worry and waiting , being alone , and being isolated , emerged from the data. Participants had delays ( waiting ) in getting their surgery scheduled, which produced worry that they would lose more function, become permanently disabled, have increased pain, and experience more complications such as falls. Participants described being alone during their hospital and rehabilitation recovery, without physical or emotional support from family and limited nursing staff contact. Being isolated often occurred from institution policy, restricting participants to their rooms leading to boredom and, for some, panic. CONCLUSIONS: Restricted access to family after spine surgery and during recovery resulted in emotional and physical burden for participants. Our findings support neuroscience nurses advocating for family/care partner integration into patient care delivery and investigation into the effect of system-level policies on patient care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"55 4","pages":"113-118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332507/pdf/neuronurse-55-113.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Older people with debilitating degenerative spine disease may benefit from surgery. However, recovery is described as a circuitous process. In general, they describe feeling powerless and receiving depersonalized care during hospitalization. Institution of hospital no-visitor policies to reduce COVID-19 spread may have caused additional negative consequences. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to understand experiences of older people who underwent spine surgery during early COVID-19. METHODS: Grounded theory guided this study of people 65 years or older undergoing elective spine surgery. Fourteen individuals were recruited for 2 in-depth interviews at 2 time points: T1 during hospitalization and T2, 1 to 3 months post discharge. All participants were affected by pandemic-imposed restrictions with 4 interviews at T1 with no visitors, 10 with a 1-visitor policy, and 6 interviews at T2 rehabilitation setting with no visitors. Discriminate sampling of data in which participants described their experiences with COVID-19 visitor restrictions was used. Open and axial coding (consistent with grounded theory) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Three categories, worry and waiting , being alone , and being isolated , emerged from the data. Participants had delays ( waiting ) in getting their surgery scheduled, which produced worry that they would lose more function, become permanently disabled, have increased pain, and experience more complications such as falls. Participants described being alone during their hospital and rehabilitation recovery, without physical or emotional support from family and limited nursing staff contact. Being isolated often occurred from institution policy, restricting participants to their rooms leading to boredom and, for some, panic. CONCLUSIONS: Restricted access to family after spine surgery and during recovery resulted in emotional and physical burden for participants. Our findings support neuroscience nurses advocating for family/care partner integration into patient care delivery and investigation into the effect of system-level policies on patient care and outcomes.

新冠肺炎与选择性脊柱手术:老年人单打独斗的经验。
摘要:背景:患有使人衰弱的退行性脊柱疾病的老年人可能受益于手术。然而,恢复被描述为一个迂回的过程。总的来说,他们描述了在住院期间感到无能为力和接受非个性化护理的情况。为减少新冠肺炎传播而制定的医院防疫政策可能会造成额外的负面后果。这项二次分析的目的是了解新冠肺炎早期接受脊柱手术的老年人的经历。方法:以基础理论为指导,对65岁及以上接受选择性脊柱手术的人群进行研究。招募了14名受试者,在两个时间点进行2次深入访谈:住院期间的T1和出院后1-3个月的T2。所有参与者都受到了疫情限制的影响,在T1没有访客的情况下接受了4次采访,10次接受了1次访客政策的采访,在T2没有访客的康复环境下接受了6次采访。对参与者描述他们在新冠肺炎游客限制方面的经历的数据进行了歧视性抽样。开放和轴向编码(与接地理论一致)用于数据分析。结果:从数据中可以看出担忧和等待、独处和被孤立三类。参与者在安排手术时出现了延误(等待),这导致他们担心自己会失去更多的功能,变得永久残疾,疼痛加剧,并经历更多的并发症,如跌倒。参与者描述了他们在医院和康复期间的孤独,没有家人的身体或情感支持,也没有有限的护理人员联系。被隔离经常发生在机构政策之外,将参与者限制在自己的房间里,导致无聊,对一些人来说,还会引发恐慌。结论:脊柱手术后和康复期间与家人的接触受到限制,给参与者带来了情感和身体负担。我们的研究结果支持神经科学护士倡导将家庭/护理伙伴纳入患者护理提供,并调查系统级政策对患者护理和结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team. The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信