Workflow, Time Requirement, and Quality of Medication Documentation with or without a Computerized Physician Order Entry System-A Simulation-Based Lab Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Viktoria Jungreithmayr, Walter E Haefeli, Hanna M Seidling
{"title":"Workflow, Time Requirement, and Quality of Medication Documentation with or without a Computerized Physician Order Entry System-A Simulation-Based Lab Study.","authors":"Viktoria Jungreithmayr,&nbsp;Walter E Haefeli,&nbsp;Hanna M Seidling","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system is changing workflows and redistributing tasks among health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to describe exemplary changes in workflow, to objectify the time required for medication documentation, and to evaluate documentation quality with and without a CPOE system (Cerner® i.s.h.med).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workflows were assessed either through direct observation and in-person interviews or through semistructured online interviews with clinical staff involved in medication documentation. Two case scenarios were developed consisting of exemplary medications (case 1 = 6 drugs and case 2 = 11 drugs). Physicians and nurses/documentation assistants were observed documenting the case scenarios according to workflows established prior to CPOE implementation and those newly established with CPOE implementation, measuring the time spent on each step in the documentation process. Subsequently, the documentation quality of the documented medication was assessed according to a previously established and published methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPOE implementation simplified medication documentation. The overall time needed for medication documentation increased from a median of 12:12 min (range: 07:29-21:10 min) without to 14:40 min (09:18-25:18) with the CPOE system (<i>p</i> = 0.002). With CPOE, less time was spent documenting peroral prescriptions and more time documenting intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. For physicians, documentation time approximately doubled, while nurses achieved time savings. Overall, the documentation quality increased from a median fulfillment score of 66.7% without to 100.0% with the CPOE system (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that CPOE implementation simplified the medication documentation process but increased the time spent on medication documentation by 20% in two fictitious cases. This increased time resulted in higher documentation quality, occurred at the expense of physicians, and was primarily due to intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. Therefore, measures to support physicians with complex prescriptions in the CPOE system should be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":"62 1-02","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system is changing workflows and redistributing tasks among health care professionals.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe exemplary changes in workflow, to objectify the time required for medication documentation, and to evaluate documentation quality with and without a CPOE system (Cerner® i.s.h.med).

Methods: Workflows were assessed either through direct observation and in-person interviews or through semistructured online interviews with clinical staff involved in medication documentation. Two case scenarios were developed consisting of exemplary medications (case 1 = 6 drugs and case 2 = 11 drugs). Physicians and nurses/documentation assistants were observed documenting the case scenarios according to workflows established prior to CPOE implementation and those newly established with CPOE implementation, measuring the time spent on each step in the documentation process. Subsequently, the documentation quality of the documented medication was assessed according to a previously established and published methodology.

Results: CPOE implementation simplified medication documentation. The overall time needed for medication documentation increased from a median of 12:12 min (range: 07:29-21:10 min) without to 14:40 min (09:18-25:18) with the CPOE system (p = 0.002). With CPOE, less time was spent documenting peroral prescriptions and more time documenting intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. For physicians, documentation time approximately doubled, while nurses achieved time savings. Overall, the documentation quality increased from a median fulfillment score of 66.7% without to 100.0% with the CPOE system (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study revealed that CPOE implementation simplified the medication documentation process but increased the time spent on medication documentation by 20% in two fictitious cases. This increased time resulted in higher documentation quality, occurred at the expense of physicians, and was primarily due to intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. Therefore, measures to support physicians with complex prescriptions in the CPOE system should be established.

有或没有计算机化医嘱输入系统的工作流程、时间要求和药物文件质量——基于模拟的实验室研究。
背景:计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)系统的引入正在改变医疗保健专业人员的工作流程和重新分配任务。目的:本研究的目的是描述工作流程中的典型变化,客观化药物文件所需的时间,并评估使用和不使用CPOE系统(Cerner®i.s.h.med)的文件质量。方法:通过直接观察和面对面访谈或与参与药物记录的临床工作人员进行半结构化在线访谈来评估工作流程。开发了两种由示范药物组成的病例情景(病例1 = 6种药物,病例2 = 11种药物)。观察医生和护士/文档助理根据实施CPOE之前建立的工作流程和实施CPOE后新建立的工作流程记录病例场景,测量文档流程中每个步骤所花费的时间。随后,根据先前建立和发表的方法评估记录药物的文件质量。结果:CPOE的实施简化了用药记录。用药记录所需的总时间从无CPOE系统的中位数12:12 min(范围:07:29-21:10 min)增加到有CPOE系统的14:40 min (09:18-25:18) (p = 0.002)。在CPOE中,记录口服处方的时间更少,记录静脉/皮下处方的时间更多。对于医生来说,记录时间大约翻了一番,而护士则节省了时间。总体而言,使用CPOE系统后,文件质量从未使用CPOE系统的66.7%中位数满意度提高到100.0%。结论:本研究显示,在两个虚构病例中,CPOE的实施简化了药物文件编制过程,但增加了花费在药物文件编制上的时间20%。这增加的时间导致更高的文件质量,以牺牲医生为代价,主要是由于静脉/皮下处方。因此,应建立支持CPOE系统中处方复杂的医生的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信