Effect of Fentanyl for Preterm Infants on Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529440
Yosuke Sudo, Junko Seki-Nagasawa, Daigo Kajikawa, Gen Kuratsuji, Mitsuhiro Haga, Farhad Shokraneh, Noyuri Yamaji, Erika Ota, Fumihiko Namba
{"title":"Effect of Fentanyl for Preterm Infants on Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yosuke Sudo,&nbsp;Junko Seki-Nagasawa,&nbsp;Daigo Kajikawa,&nbsp;Gen Kuratsuji,&nbsp;Mitsuhiro Haga,&nbsp;Farhad Shokraneh,&nbsp;Noyuri Yamaji,&nbsp;Erika Ota,&nbsp;Fumihiko Namba","doi":"10.1159/000529440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Because excessive physical stress is harmful, reducing pain and discomfort in premature neonates during mechanical ventilation is a major challenge for physicians. There are no consensus and systematic review on the use of fentanyl, the most commonly used pain reliever in preterm neonates during mechanical ventilation. We aim to compare the benefits and harms of fentanyl versus placebo or no drug for preterm neonates receiving mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The systematic review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Scientific databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched. All preterm infants on mechanical ventilation and enrolled in an RCT of fentanyl versus control were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 256 reports initially retrieved, 4 reports met the eligibility criteria. Fentanyl was not associated with mortality risk compared to the control (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.36-1.44). No increase in ventilation duration (mean difference [MD]: 0.04, 95% CIs: -0.63-0.71) and no effect on hospital stay length (MD: 4.00, 95% CIs: -7.12-15.12) were found. Fentanyl intervention does not affect any other morbidities, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), severe IVH, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis failed to demonstrate the benefit of administering fentanyl to preterm infants on mechanical ventilation in mortality and morbidities. Follow-up studies are required to investigate the long-term neurodevelopment of the children.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Because excessive physical stress is harmful, reducing pain and discomfort in premature neonates during mechanical ventilation is a major challenge for physicians. There are no consensus and systematic review on the use of fentanyl, the most commonly used pain reliever in preterm neonates during mechanical ventilation. We aim to compare the benefits and harms of fentanyl versus placebo or no drug for preterm neonates receiving mechanical ventilation.

Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The systematic review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Scientific databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched. All preterm infants on mechanical ventilation and enrolled in an RCT of fentanyl versus control were included.

Results: Of 256 reports initially retrieved, 4 reports met the eligibility criteria. Fentanyl was not associated with mortality risk compared to the control (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.36-1.44). No increase in ventilation duration (mean difference [MD]: 0.04, 95% CIs: -0.63-0.71) and no effect on hospital stay length (MD: 4.00, 95% CIs: -7.12-15.12) were found. Fentanyl intervention does not affect any other morbidities, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), severe IVH, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis.

Conclusion: The present systematic review and meta-analysis failed to demonstrate the benefit of administering fentanyl to preterm infants on mechanical ventilation in mortality and morbidities. Follow-up studies are required to investigate the long-term neurodevelopment of the children.

芬太尼对早产儿机械通气的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:由于过度的身体压力是有害的,因此减轻机械通气期间早产儿的疼痛和不适是医生面临的主要挑战。芬太尼是早产儿在机械通气期间最常用的止痛药,但关于芬太尼的使用尚无共识和系统综述。我们的目的是比较芬太尼与安慰剂或无药物对接受机械通气的早产儿的益处和危害。方法:根据Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册对随机对照试验(rct)进行系统评价。系统评价采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行报告。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL和CINAHL等科学数据库。所有使用机械通气并加入芬太尼与对照对照的随机对照试验的早产儿被纳入研究。结果:在最初检索的256份报告中,有4份报告符合资格标准。与对照组相比,芬太尼与死亡风险无关(风险比:0.72,95%可信区间[ci]: 0.36-1.44)。通气时间无增加(平均差值[MD]: 0.04, 95% ci: -0.63-0.71),住院时间无增加(MD: 4.00, 95% ci: -7.12-15.12)。芬太尼干预不影响任何其他疾病,包括支气管肺发育不良、脑室周围白质软化、动脉导管未闭、脑室内出血(IVH)、严重IVH、败血症和坏死性小肠结肠炎。结论:目前的系统评价和荟萃分析未能证明芬太尼对机械通气的早产儿在死亡率和发病率方面的益处。需要后续研究来调查儿童的长期神经发育情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信