Exposure to natural vegetation in relation to mammographic density in a Massachusetts-based clinical cohort.

IF 3.3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lyndsey K Blair, Erica T Warner, Peter James, Jaime E Hart, Trang VoPham, Mollie E Barnard, Johnnie D Newton, Divya J Murthy, Francine Laden, Rulla M Tamimi, Natalie C DuPre
{"title":"Exposure to natural vegetation in relation to mammographic density in a Massachusetts-based clinical cohort.","authors":"Lyndsey K Blair,&nbsp;Erica T Warner,&nbsp;Peter James,&nbsp;Jaime E Hart,&nbsp;Trang VoPham,&nbsp;Mollie E Barnard,&nbsp;Johnnie D Newton,&nbsp;Divya J Murthy,&nbsp;Francine Laden,&nbsp;Rulla M Tamimi,&nbsp;Natalie C DuPre","doi":"10.1097/EE9.0000000000000216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inverse associations between natural vegetation exposure (i.e., greenness) and breast cancer risk have been reported; however, it remains unknown whether greenness affects breast tissue development or operates through other mechanisms (e.g., body mass index [BMI] or physical activity). We examined the association between greenness and mammographic density-a strong breast cancer risk factor-to determine whether greenness influences breast tissue composition independent of lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women (n = 2,318) without a history of breast cancer underwent mammographic screening at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2006 to 2014. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) satellite data at 1-km<sup>2</sup> resolution were used to estimate greenness at participants' residential address 1, 3, and 5 years before mammogram. We used multivariable linear regression to estimate differences in log-transformed volumetric mammographic density measures and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each 0.1 unit increase in NDVI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year annual average NDVI was not associated with percent mammographic density in premenopausal (β = -0.01; 95% CI = -0.03, 0.02; <i>P</i> = 0.58) and postmenopausal women (β = -0.02; 95% CI = -0.04, 0.01; <i>P</i> = 0.18). Results were similar for 1-year and 3-year NDVI measures and in models including potential mediators of BMI and physical activity. There were also no associations between greenness and dense volume and nondense volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greenness exposures were not associated with mammographic density.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Prior observations of a protective association between greenness and breast cancer may not be driven by differences in breast tissue composition, as measured by mammographic density, but rather other mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11713,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/94/ee9-6-e216.PMC9374192.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Inverse associations between natural vegetation exposure (i.e., greenness) and breast cancer risk have been reported; however, it remains unknown whether greenness affects breast tissue development or operates through other mechanisms (e.g., body mass index [BMI] or physical activity). We examined the association between greenness and mammographic density-a strong breast cancer risk factor-to determine whether greenness influences breast tissue composition independent of lifestyle factors.

Methods: Women (n = 2,318) without a history of breast cancer underwent mammographic screening at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2006 to 2014. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) satellite data at 1-km2 resolution were used to estimate greenness at participants' residential address 1, 3, and 5 years before mammogram. We used multivariable linear regression to estimate differences in log-transformed volumetric mammographic density measures and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each 0.1 unit increase in NDVI.

Results: Five-year annual average NDVI was not associated with percent mammographic density in premenopausal (β = -0.01; 95% CI = -0.03, 0.02; P = 0.58) and postmenopausal women (β = -0.02; 95% CI = -0.04, 0.01; P = 0.18). Results were similar for 1-year and 3-year NDVI measures and in models including potential mediators of BMI and physical activity. There were also no associations between greenness and dense volume and nondense volume.

Conclusions: Greenness exposures were not associated with mammographic density.

Impact: Prior observations of a protective association between greenness and breast cancer may not be driven by differences in breast tissue composition, as measured by mammographic density, but rather other mechanisms.

在马萨诸塞州的临床队列中,自然植被暴露与乳房x线摄影密度的关系。
据报道,自然植被暴露(即绿色)与乳腺癌风险呈负相关;然而,尚不清楚绿色是否会影响乳房组织发育或通过其他机制(例如,体重指数[BMI]或身体活动)起作用。我们研究了绿度和乳房x线摄影密度之间的关系——一个强有力的乳腺癌风险因素——以确定绿度是否独立于生活方式因素影响乳房组织组成。方法:2006年至2014年,无乳腺癌病史的女性(n = 2318)在马萨诸塞州波士顿布里格姆妇女医院接受了乳房x光检查。使用1平方公里分辨率的归一化植被指数(NDVI)卫星数据来估计参与者在乳房x光检查前1、3和5年的居住地址的绿化率。我们使用多变量线性回归来估计对数转换的乳腺容积密度测量值和NDVI每增加0.1个单位的95%置信区间(ci)的差异。结果:绝经前患者5年平均NDVI与乳腺x线摄影密度百分比无关(β = -0.01;95% ci = -0.03, 0.02;P = 0.58)和绝经后妇女(β = -0.02;95% ci = -0.04, 0.01;P = 0.18)。1年和3年NDVI测量以及包括BMI和身体活动的潜在介质的模型的结果相似。绿化率与密集体积和非密集体积之间也没有关联。结论:绿色暴露与乳腺x线摄影密度无关。影响:先前观察到的绿色与乳腺癌之间的保护性关联可能不是由乳房组织组成的差异驱动的,由乳房x线摄影密度测量,而是其他机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信