Detecting cervical esophagus with ultrasound on healthy voluntaries: learning curve.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Paul-Georges Reuter, Chris Ballouz, Thomas Loeb, Tomislav Petrovic, Frédéric Lapostolle
{"title":"Detecting cervical esophagus with ultrasound on healthy voluntaries: learning curve.","authors":"Paul-Georges Reuter,&nbsp;Chris Ballouz,&nbsp;Thomas Loeb,&nbsp;Tomislav Petrovic,&nbsp;Frédéric Lapostolle","doi":"10.1186/s13089-023-00315-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the learning curve of tracheal-esophageal ultrasound by prehospital medical and paramedical staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center prospective study was carried out at a French EMS (SAMU 92). Volunteer participants first received a short theoretical training through e-learning, followed by two separate hands-on workshops on healthy volunteers, spaced one to two months apart. Learners were timed to obtain the tracheal-esophageal ultrasound target image 10 consecutive times. The first workshop was intended to perform a learning curve, and the second was to assess unlearning. The secondary objectives were to compare performance by profession and by previous ultrasound experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 32 participants with a mean age of 38 (± 10) years, consisting of 56% men. During the first workshop, the target image acquisition time was 20.4 [IQR: 10.6;41] seconds on the first try and 5.02 [3.72;7.5] seconds on the 10th (p < 0.0001). The image acquisition time during the second workshop was shorter compared to the first one (p = 0.016). In subgroup analyses, we found no significant difference between physicians and nurses (p = 0.055 at the first workshop and p = 0.164 at the second) or according to previous ultrasound experience (p = 0.054 at the first workshop and p = 0.176), counter to multivariate analysis (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A short web-based learning completed by a hands-on workshop made it possible to obtain the ultrasound image in less than 10 s, regardless of the profession or previous experience in ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151284/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00315-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the learning curve of tracheal-esophageal ultrasound by prehospital medical and paramedical staff.

Methods: A single-center prospective study was carried out at a French EMS (SAMU 92). Volunteer participants first received a short theoretical training through e-learning, followed by two separate hands-on workshops on healthy volunteers, spaced one to two months apart. Learners were timed to obtain the tracheal-esophageal ultrasound target image 10 consecutive times. The first workshop was intended to perform a learning curve, and the second was to assess unlearning. The secondary objectives were to compare performance by profession and by previous ultrasound experience.

Results: We included 32 participants with a mean age of 38 (± 10) years, consisting of 56% men. During the first workshop, the target image acquisition time was 20.4 [IQR: 10.6;41] seconds on the first try and 5.02 [3.72;7.5] seconds on the 10th (p < 0.0001). The image acquisition time during the second workshop was shorter compared to the first one (p = 0.016). In subgroup analyses, we found no significant difference between physicians and nurses (p = 0.055 at the first workshop and p = 0.164 at the second) or according to previous ultrasound experience (p = 0.054 at the first workshop and p = 0.176), counter to multivariate analysis (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: A short web-based learning completed by a hands-on workshop made it possible to obtain the ultrasound image in less than 10 s, regardless of the profession or previous experience in ultrasound.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

健康志愿者超声检测颈部食管:学习曲线。
背景:本研究的目的是确定院前医务人员和医务辅助人员对气管-食管超声的学习曲线。方法:在法国EMS (SAMU 92)进行单中心前瞻性研究。志愿者参与者首先通过电子学习接受了短暂的理论培训,然后是两次单独的健康志愿者实践讲习班,间隔一到两个月。学习者定时连续10次获得气管-食管超声靶图像。第一次研讨会的目的是执行学习曲线,第二次是评估遗忘。次要目的是比较专业和以前超声经验的表现。结果:我们纳入了32名参与者,平均年龄为38(±10)岁,其中56%为男性。在第一次workshop中,第一次尝试的目标图像采集时间为20.4 [IQR: 10.6;41]秒,第10次尝试的目标图像采集时间为5.02[3.72;7.5]秒(p)。结论:通过一个实践workshop完成的简短的网络学习,无论专业或以前的超声经验如何,都可以在不到10秒的时间内获得超声图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信