Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving.

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lyn D English
{"title":"Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving.","authors":"Lyn D English","doi":"10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article proposes an interconnected framework, <i>Ways of thinking in STEM-based Problem Solving</i>, which addresses cognitive processes that facilitate learning, problem solving, and interdisciplinary concept development. The framework comprises critical thinking, incorporating critical mathematical modelling and philosophical inquiry, systems thinking, and design-based thinking, which collectively contribute to adaptive and innovative thinking. It is argued that the pinnacle of this framework is learning innovation, involving the generation of powerful disciplinary knowledge and thinking processes that can be applied to subsequent problem challenges. Consideration is first given to STEM-based problem solving with a focus on mathematics. Mathematical and STEM-based problems are viewed here as goal-directed, multifaceted experiences that (1) demand core, facilitative ways of thinking, (2) require the development of productive and adaptive ways to navigate complexity, (3) enable multiple approaches and practices, (4) recruit interdisciplinary solution processes, and (5) facilitate the growth of learning innovation. The nature, role, and contributions of each way of thinking in STEM-based problem solving and learning are then explored, with their interactions highlighted. Examples from classroom-based research are presented, together with teaching implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51441,"journal":{"name":"Zdm-Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdm-Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proposes an interconnected framework, Ways of thinking in STEM-based Problem Solving, which addresses cognitive processes that facilitate learning, problem solving, and interdisciplinary concept development. The framework comprises critical thinking, incorporating critical mathematical modelling and philosophical inquiry, systems thinking, and design-based thinking, which collectively contribute to adaptive and innovative thinking. It is argued that the pinnacle of this framework is learning innovation, involving the generation of powerful disciplinary knowledge and thinking processes that can be applied to subsequent problem challenges. Consideration is first given to STEM-based problem solving with a focus on mathematics. Mathematical and STEM-based problems are viewed here as goal-directed, multifaceted experiences that (1) demand core, facilitative ways of thinking, (2) require the development of productive and adaptive ways to navigate complexity, (3) enable multiple approaches and practices, (4) recruit interdisciplinary solution processes, and (5) facilitate the growth of learning innovation. The nature, role, and contributions of each way of thinking in STEM-based problem solving and learning are then explored, with their interactions highlighted. Examples from classroom-based research are presented, together with teaching implications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于STEM的问题解决的思维方式。
本文提出了一个相互关联的框架,即基于STEM的问题解决中的思维方式,该框架涉及促进学习、问题解决和跨学科概念发展的认知过程。该框架包括批判性思维,包括批判性数学建模和哲学探究、系统思维和基于设计的思维,它们共同促进了适应性和创新思维。有人认为,这一框架的顶峰是学习创新,包括产生强大的学科知识和思维过程,这些知识和过程可以应用于后续的问题挑战。首先考虑基于STEM的问题解决,重点是数学。基于数学和STEM的问题在这里被视为目标导向的多方面体验,(1)需要核心的、方便的思维方式,(2)需要开发富有成效和适应性的方法来驾驭复杂性,(3)实现多种方法和实践,(4)招募跨学科的解决过程,以及(5)促进学习创新的发展。然后探讨了每种思维方式在基于STEM的问题解决和学习中的性质、作用和贡献,并强调了它们的相互作用。列举了课堂研究的例子,以及教学启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zdm-Mathematics Education
Zdm-Mathematics Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: ZDM – Mathematics Education is one of the oldest mathematics education research journals. The papers appearing in the seven themed issues per year are strictly by invitation only followed by internal peer review by the guest-editors and external review by invited experts. The journal exists to survey, discuss and extend current research-based and theoretical perspectives as well as to create a forum for critical analyses of issues within mathematics education. The audience is pre-dominantly mathematics education researchers around the world interested in current developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信