[Medium-term Results after percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy in Dupuytren's Disease].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Emmanouil Nichlos, Olaf Wölfle, Ingo Marzi, Johannes Frank, Katharina Sommer
{"title":"[Medium-term Results after percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy in Dupuytren's Disease].","authors":"Emmanouil Nichlos,&nbsp;Olaf Wölfle,&nbsp;Ingo Marzi,&nbsp;Johannes Frank,&nbsp;Katharina Sommer","doi":"10.1055/a-2055-1592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dupuytren's disease often leads to an increasing limitation in finger extension in affected patients. As the incidence rises with age, the number of cases is expected to rise in the future due to the demographic change. Therefore, an easy and patient-oriented treatment is required. In the following study, we investigated the short and medium-term results after percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Overall, 65 fingers of 40 patients were treated with PNF. We evaluated the total passive deficit of extension (TPED), the passive deficit of extension of the joints (PED), the Buck-Gramcko score, rate of recurrence, DASH score and patient satisfaction. The average age of the patients was 65,9 years. Most of the patients (82%) were male.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Directly after the PNF, extension in the treated fingers improved significantly (TPED before PNF 74,6°±41,1 SD to 32,8°±29,0 SD after the procedure). By the time of the follow-up examination (30,2±13,9 SD months), TPED had increased again (52,7°±40,2 SD). The rate of recurrence was 29,7%, and a higher Tubiana stage before the procedure correlated significantly with a higher recurrence rate. Nevertheless, patients demonstrated a very high level of satisfaction with the procedure and almost all patients would choose to undergo PNF again.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although it is associated with a relatively high recurrence rate, PNF represents an effective and patient-oriented treatment of Dupuytren's contracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":55075,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/e3/10-1055-a-2055-1592.PMC10513775.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2055-1592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dupuytren's disease often leads to an increasing limitation in finger extension in affected patients. As the incidence rises with age, the number of cases is expected to rise in the future due to the demographic change. Therefore, an easy and patient-oriented treatment is required. In the following study, we investigated the short and medium-term results after percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF).

Patients and methods: Overall, 65 fingers of 40 patients were treated with PNF. We evaluated the total passive deficit of extension (TPED), the passive deficit of extension of the joints (PED), the Buck-Gramcko score, rate of recurrence, DASH score and patient satisfaction. The average age of the patients was 65,9 years. Most of the patients (82%) were male.

Results: Directly after the PNF, extension in the treated fingers improved significantly (TPED before PNF 74,6°±41,1 SD to 32,8°±29,0 SD after the procedure). By the time of the follow-up examination (30,2±13,9 SD months), TPED had increased again (52,7°±40,2 SD). The rate of recurrence was 29,7%, and a higher Tubiana stage before the procedure correlated significantly with a higher recurrence rate. Nevertheless, patients demonstrated a very high level of satisfaction with the procedure and almost all patients would choose to undergo PNF again.

Conclusion: Although it is associated with a relatively high recurrence rate, PNF represents an effective and patient-oriented treatment of Dupuytren's contracture.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[经皮针筋膜切开术治疗Dupuytren's病后的中期结果]。
背景:Dupuytren's病经常导致受影响患者的手指伸展越来越受限。随着发病率随着年龄的增长而上升,由于人口结构的变化,预计未来病例数量还会上升。因此,需要一种简单且以患者为导向的治疗方法。在以下研究中,我们调查了经皮针筋膜切开术(PNF)后的短期和中期结果。患者和方法:总共40例患者中的65指接受了PNF治疗。我们评估了总被动伸展缺损(TPED)、被动关节伸展缺损(PED)、Buck-Gramcko评分、复发率、DASH评分和患者满意度。患者的平均年龄为65,9岁。大多数患者(82%)为男性。结果:PNF后即刻,治疗手指的伸伸度显著改善(PNF前TPED 74,6°±41,1 SD至32.8°±29,0 SD)。到随访检查时(30.2±13,9 SD月),TPED再次增加(52.7°±40.2 SD)。复发率为29,7%,术前Tubiana分期越高,复发率越高。然而,患者对该手术表现出非常高的满意度,几乎所有患者都会选择再次接受PNF。结论:尽管PNF的复发率相对较高,但它是Dupuytren挛缩症的一种有效且以患者为导向的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten finden Sie die neuesten Informationen über: Diagnostik Verfahrenswahl state of the art / neueste Techniken rekonstruktive Verfahren Behandlung infolge von Traumata oder OP Bewertung der Ergebnisse Klinische Forschung Interessante Darstellung der neuesten Erkenntnisse in Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten. Exzellent veranschaulicht durch ein klares Layout und reiche Bebilderung. Überzeugen Sie sich selbst! Organschaften Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Handchirurgie, Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie und Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信